Is Pahoran a Hypocrite?

[_Kevin Graham]

Am I the only one who thinks it's a bad idea not to edit out those in real life JP Holding even though Pahoran didn't do so?

I emailed FARMS and Dan Peterson personally about this issue. I assumed they would do the right thing and edit it out. I don't remembver exactly what Dan's response was, but I am fairly certain he said he would look into it and see what he could do. I mean he is the "editor," after all.

Apparently, they were more worried about offending their rhetoric specialist who provided them with that sad excuse for a "review."

[_Pahoran]

Then there was the short-lived posting career of "Lord" [in real life name deleted], the man who single-handedly (according to him) forced the Church to extend the Priesthood to Blacks.

Evidently God is still not entirely sure that he has [in real life name deleted] wholehearted permission, since the Temple still stands.

Actually the fellow posted under his in real life name. Oh, the hypocrisy!

You can accuse me of "outing" him though, if you like.

After all, without lies, you'd have nothing to post.

Regards,
Pahoran

[_Mister Scratch]

Then there was the short-lived posting career of "Lord" [in real life name deleted], the man who single-handedly (according to him) forced the Church to extend the Priesthood to Blacks.

Evidently God is still not entirely sure that he has [in real life name deleted] wholehearted permission, since the Temple still stands.

Actually the fellow posted under his in real life name. Oh, the hypocrisy!

You can accuse me of "outing" him though, if you like.

After all, without lies, you'd have nothing to post.

Regards,
Pahoran

Nice how you neatly overlooked the other three people mentioned both in the citation and in Kevin's post. Frankly, Pah, you seem so completely heartless and evil---totally rotten to the core---that I don't think I can interact with you any more. The sort of stuff you've been pulling and supporting is sickening, in my opinion.

[_MormonMendacity]

Worse than a hypocrite he just hates people who simply want to share their testimonies about the untruthfulness of Mormonism.

[_Dr. Shades]

Actually the fellow posted under his in real life name. Oh, the hypocrisy!

You can accuse me of "outing" him though, if you like.

After all, without lies, you'd have nothing to post.

Regards,
Pahoran

Pahoran, didn't you repeatedly "out" Phos1 over on ZLMB? I remember that not only did you post his real name, but you also posted his former religion.

What do you have to say about that?

[_Polygamy Porter]

Pah? What say ye?

*cue sound of chirping crickets*

[_wenglund]

Pah? What say ye?

*cue sound of chirping crickets*

*now fade into the theme song of the Pink Panther movies and display a visual montage of Chief Inspector Clouseau disquiesed as "Dr." Shades conducting an investigation*

[_Pahoran]

Then there was the short-lived posting career of "Lord" [in real life name deleted], the man who single-handedly (according to him) forced the Church to extend the Priesthood to Blacks.

Evidently God is still not entirely sure that he has [in real life name deleted] wholehearted permission, since the Temple still stands.

Actually the fellow posted under his in real life name. Oh, the hypocrisy!

You can accuse me of "outing" him though, if you like.

After all, without lies, you'd have nothing to post.

Regards,
Pahoran

Nice how you neatly overlooked the other three people mentioned both in the citation and in Kevin's post.

Other three?

You can't even count to two without making an arithmetic mistake?

Kevin's post canvasses matters irrelevant to this discussion, and indeed to this forum. Suffice it to say that it is not an exception to the old rule about "two sides to every story." Referring to your earlier post: the one other "in real life name deleted" was of a person whose details I can no longer find. But I am confident that I did not "out" him. In the early days of ZLMB, a lot of people either posted under their own names, like "Lord" Douglas Wallace, or else used a posting handle but signed their posts with their own names.

But will these facts appear in your obsessive hate blog? I should live so long!

But speaking of neat overlookings: why does your original post, in citing material that purports to come from me, not even note that you have silently elided material cited from Wallace's self-published autobiography on the Internet? The one to which he himself had linked, and encouraged us to read?

There's not even an ellipsis to indicate the snippage!

Frankly, Pah, you seem so completely heartless and evil---totally rotten to the core---that I don't think I can interact with you any more. The sort of stuff you've been pulling and supporting is sickening, in my opinion.

Let's see. The very worst you've been able to accuse me of is what you yourself tried to do--and you describe it thus? "Completely heartless and evil---totally rotten to the core" as a description of your own activities?

Whose face are you spiting when you thus cut off your own nose?

Regards,
Pahoran

[_Pahoran]

Actually the fellow posted under his in real life name. Oh, the hypocrisy!

You can accuse me of "outing" him though, if you like.

After all, without lies, you'd have nothing to post.

Regards,
Pahoran

Pahoran, didn't you repeatedly "out" Phos1 over on ZLMB? I remember that not only did you post his real name, but you also posted his former religion.

What do you have to say about that?

I have to say that you have offered no case for me to answer.

It's been a long time, and I only vaguely remember the execrable Phos. Mostly I remember (1) that he makes me look like Mother Teresa, which even I know isn't easy, and (2) he changed posting handles early and often. If I "outed" him in any way, it would have been by connecting his various sock-puppets to each other. I'm not even certain that it was me who first named him as B__ B_____ anyway.

Regards,
Pahoran

[_Pahoran]

Dear Mister Scratch,

you previously wrote:

That he would show up to participate is praiseworthy, and I, for one, am glad to have him here.

Did you really mean it, or was that merely an act?

Your subsequent maneuvers show that it was merely an act.

Frankly, Pah, you seem so completely heartless and evil---totally rotten to the core---that I don't think I can interact with you any more. The sort of stuff you've been pulling and supporting is sickening, in my opinion.

So let us review: what is it that you think makes me "so completely heartless and evil---totally rotten to the core?"

Why, that you think you have dug up evidence from years ago that shows that I did the same thing you did just three weeks ago.

It seems to me that if I was really as "completely heartless and evil---totally rotten to the core" as you are, you shouldn't have to dig back through years of posts to find it, should you?

The evidence should be (1) abundant and (2) ready to hand, as it is in your case.

So, where is it?

Unfortunately, that post does not show that I'm as bad as you. Each of the two people named had posted using their own names.

As you perfectly well know.

But, as your blog shows, you are not honest enough to admit that fact.

And of course, you really didn't search for that post, did you, Scratch? ZLMB's search engine is drop-dead useless; it couldn't find water in the ocean. Clearly you had saved it to an archive of your own.

Which most probably means that you were a participant in ZLMB at the time.

Perhaps even one of the two named in the post you copied. After all, why save it if it doesn't relate to you?

But don't worry, Scratch; I'm not going to name you. I don't do that sort of thing.

And finally, even if I did, how would me being just as "completely heartless and evil---totally rotten to the core" as you are possibly justify you being unable to lower yourself to interact with me?

In exactly what would your pose of olympian superiority consist?

Inquiring minds want to know!

Regards,
Pahoran