Dr. Shades wrote: I don't know. As has already been stated, lots of Mormons are die-hard believers but are simply inactive for one reason or another. I chose to give Plutarch the benefit of the doubt on this one. Let's face it: We all know he's 100% TBM, but how can we know if he actually attends his ward or not?
He seemed to have given it away that he was joking with his line "I don't go because I keep wanting to correct the grammar of the speakers."
Ray, I'll drop further questioning on the issue of how you rationally arrived at a conclusion that the Book of Mormon is divinely or a God inspired.
marg wrote: Ray, I'll drop further questioning on the issue of how you rationally arrived at a conclusion that the Book of Mormon is divinely or a God inspired.
I never arrived at that conclusion. I can't even decipher it.
Rollo Tomasi wrote:C'mon folks, Plutarch is pulling our collective leg. Not long ago he was representing himself as a bishop, dropping names of his GA buddies, etc., etc., etc. He goes, he goes. Don't fall for it, gang.
I don't know. As has already been stated, lots of Mormons are die-hard believers but are simply inactive for one reason or another. I chose to give Plutarch the benefit of the doubt on this one. Let's face it: We all know he's 100% TBM, but how can we know if he actually attends his ward or not?
Plutarch is bishop lee, last name has beenmade public before, here I think. He is a current bishop.
Jason Bourne wrote:Plutarch is bishop lee, last name has beenmade public before, here I think. He is a current bishop.
He may have been calling himself "bishop lee"--sort of like I call myself "Dr. Shades"--but perhaps he's no more a real bishop than I am a real doctor.
Has he ever claimed to be an actual bishop?
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"
Jason Bourne wrote:Plutarch is bishop lee, last name has beenmade public before, here I think. He is a current bishop.
He may have been calling himself "bishop lee"--sort of like I call myself "Dr. Shades"--but perhaps he's no more a real bishop than I am a real doctor.
Has he ever claimed to be an actual bishop?
yes he has. On your old board. I know who he is because he himself revealed it on your old board. But I am not going to disclose that here because that is not my perogative.
Dr. Shades wrote:Has he ever claimed to be an actual bishop?
yes he has. On your old board. I know who he is because he himself revealed it on your old board. But I am not going to disclose that here because that is not my perogative.
In that case, I finally stand corrected. I can accept that he was pulling our leg with this thread. Now my only question is, why?
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"
Of course, he may just think he's getting back at us for having his own errors and lack of substance exposed after endlessly complaining about everyone else's lack of substance and grammatical errors.
But he's really making fun of people who are severely incapacitated by disorders out of their control. (yeah, I just said that twice instead of editing, hoping it will irritate plutarch)
We hate to seem like we don’t trust every nut with a story, but there’s evidence we can point to, and dance while shouting taunting phrases.
Rollo Tomasi wrote:C'mon folks, Plutarch is pulling our collective leg. Not long ago he was representing himself as a bishop, dropping names of his GA buddies, etc., etc., etc. He goes, he goes. Don't fall for it, gang.
I don't know. As has already been stated, lots of Mormons are die-hard believers but are simply inactive for one reason or another. I chose to give Plutarch the benefit of the doubt on this one. Let's face it: We all know he's 100% TBM, but how can we know if he actually attends his ward or not?
That is my point.
How can one call themselves a TBM if they do not live it?