Ex-LDS What one issue....

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_Jersey Girl
_Emeritus
Posts: 34407
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:16 am

Post by _Jersey Girl »

Polygamy Porter wrote:
Jersey Girl wrote:
Polygamy Porter wrote:Well, as long as this poll is not "creepy", I will respond.

For me it was more complicated and that's probably the case for most.

The realization that Joseph Smith did not translate jack squat from the papyrus brought me to the further realization that he was a complete fraud. If he lied about translating one thing then why not every thing else that he touched?


Porter,

This isn't a "poll". It's an inquiry. I think you're referring to the Book of Abraham. Fair enough.

Jersey Girl
Whatsa the matter girl with one shoe?

You can dish out the ill feelings to posters, but cannot take it?


Porter,

Eventually you're going to be able to read, think and type at the same time. No really, all things are possible. There were no "ill feelings" expressed in my post to you. I corrected your use of the word "poll". As I stated, this isn't a poll. It's an inquiry. There's a difference. If you're going to attempt to post smart ass comebacks to me, try keeping them in context so they actually make sense. Until then, they're really just half assed.

Jersey Girl
Last edited by Google Feedfetcher on Sat Dec 16, 2006 7:57 pm, edited 2 times in total.
_Jersey Girl
_Emeritus
Posts: 34407
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:16 am

Post by _Jersey Girl »

Now, Loran...this thread was directed to ex-LDS. It was a serious inquiry. And what do you do with it? You come in to disrupt the alleged and much hoped for train of thought. When you become ex-LDS please feel free to offer the issue that led to your exit. Until then, kindly get yourself the hell out of the thread if you have nothing else to contribute but derailment. Do unto others, Loran...is that how I handled your threads on homosexuality? Of course you are under no obligation whatsoever to meet any request I make to you here. I left my bullseye over on Z so I won't be letting you use me or these threads for target practice without challenging you.

Jersey Girl
_Polygamy Porter
_Emeritus
Posts: 2204
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 6:04 am

Post by _Polygamy Porter »

Jersey Girl wrote:
Polygamy Porter wrote:
Jersey Girl wrote:
Polygamy Porter wrote:Well, as long as this poll is not "creepy", I will respond.

For me it was more complicated and that's probably the case for most.

The realization that Joseph Smith did not translate jack squat from the papyrus brought me to the further realization that he was a complete fraud. If he lied about translating one thing then why not every thing else that he touched?


Porter,

This isn't a "poll". It's an inquiry. I think you're referring to the Book of Abraham. Fair enough.

Jersey Girl
Whatsa the matter girl with one shoe?

You can dish out the ill feelings to posters, but cannot take it?


Porter,

Eventually you're going to be able to read, think and type at the same time. No really, all things are possible. There were no "ill feelings" expressed in my post to you. I corrected your use of the word "poll". As I stated, this isn't a poll. It's an inquiry. There's a difference.

Jersey Girl
Girl with the missing shoe,

No offense taken on my part sister. I not only have a thick skull but very thick skin.

I was referring to the rash that you were giving Bond about his "creepy" polls. If you notice, I did not respond to his poll because I did not want to. Just so you know, you don't have to read every post and reply to every poll, k?
_Coggins7
_Emeritus
Posts: 3679
Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 12:25 am

Post by _Coggins7 »

Now, Loran...this thread was directed to ex-LDS. It was a serious inquiry. And what do you do with it? You come in to disrupt the alleged and much hoped for train of thought. When you become ex-LDS please feel free to offer the issue that led to your exit. Until then, kindly get yourself the hell out of the thread if you have nothing else to contribute but derailment. Do unto others, Loran...is that how I handled your threads on homosexuality? Of course you are under no obligation whatsoever to meet any request I make to you here. I left my bullseye over on Z so I won't be letting you use me or these threads for target practice without challenging you.


Loran:

But...but...but...all I did was precisely the same kind of thing most of the exmos here do on other threads all the time, with even the most sensitive and sacred beliefs of others? My my, aren't we thin skinned when the dishing out becomes taking.

Loran.
_Jersey Girl
_Emeritus
Posts: 34407
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:16 am

Post by _Jersey Girl »

Polygamy Porter wrote:
Jersey Girl wrote:
Polygamy Porter wrote:
Jersey Girl wrote:
Polygamy Porter wrote:Well, as long as this poll is not "creepy", I will respond.

For me it was more complicated and that's probably the case for most.

The realization that Joseph Smith did not translate jack squat from the papyrus brought me to the further realization that he was a complete fraud. If he lied about translating one thing then why not every thing else that he touched?


Porter,

This isn't a "poll". It's an inquiry. I think you're referring to the Book of Abraham. Fair enough.

Jersey Girl
Whatsa the matter girl with one shoe?

You can dish out the ill feelings to posters, but cannot take it?


Porter,

Eventually you're going to be able to read, think and type at the same time. No really, all things are possible. There were no "ill feelings" expressed in my post to you. I corrected your use of the word "poll". As I stated, this isn't a poll. It's an inquiry. There's a difference.

Jersey Girl
Girl with the missing shoe,

No offense taken on my part sister. I not only have a thick skull but very thick skin.

I was referring to the rash that you were giving Bond about his "creepy" polls. If you notice, I did not respond to his poll because I did not want to. Just so you know, you don't have to read every post and reply to every poll, k?


Porter,

If a post is addressed to me I will likely respond to it and you can pretty much put that in the bank. I understand that it would be far more comfortable to let your half assed jokes go without comment but that's just not the way I'm built. I know you were referring to the creepy poll remark however, your comment doesn't correspond to the nature of this thread. It's an inquiry. Am I going to keep giving you a hard time?Probably. I don't read every post nor do I reply to every poll, k?

Jersey Girl
_Jersey Girl
_Emeritus
Posts: 34407
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:16 am

Post by _Jersey Girl »

Coggins7 wrote:
Now, Loran...this thread was directed to ex-LDS. It was a serious inquiry. And what do you do with it? You come in to disrupt the alleged and much hoped for train of thought. When you become ex-LDS please feel free to offer the issue that led to your exit. Until then, kindly get yourself the hell out of the thread if you have nothing else to contribute but derailment. Do unto others, Loran...is that how I handled your threads on homosexuality? Of course you are under no obligation whatsoever to meet any request I make to you here. I left my bullseye over on Z so I won't be letting you use me or these threads for target practice without challenging you.


Loran:

But...but...but...all I did was precisely the same kind of thing most of the exmos here do on other threads all the time, with even the most sensitive and sacred beliefs of others? My my, aren't we thin skinned when the dishing out becomes taking.

Loran.


It's your lucky day, Loran, you caught me in a Jersey state of mind. If people are destroying your threads take it up with them, not me. Here you have not dished out anything and it would be delusional of you to think that were true. You simply injected an inane off topic remark. When you start actually dishing, Loran, we'll see who can take what okay, sweetie? This thread isn't to do with your most sensitive and sacred beliefs or anyone elses. It has to do with issues that led to the exit of many from your church. Trying to disrupt threads like this makes you look juvenile and insecure. You're not either of those, are you?

Jersey Girl
_OUT OF MY MISERY
_Emeritus
Posts: 922
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 2:32 pm

Post by _OUT OF MY MISERY »

keene wrote:I agree with the Yams. Those awful yams.

Actually, for me, I never believed in the first place. I was quite literally forced into the church, and couldn't leave until my second suicide attempt caused my dad to back off.



Keene
That is not good to hear, but I understand completely....my dad..well I will watch what I say right now but..My Dad....

I am glad you are still here with us...and I understand about dads...mine has never forgiven me for not following the path...

That is okay...I have done what I know is right...and I am only concerned about one persons welfare and that is my own...

and right now Keene the only person you need to worry about is yourself....
When I wake up I will be hungry....but this feels so good right now aaahhhhhh........
_Sam Harris
_Emeritus
Posts: 2261
Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2006 2:35 am

Post by _Sam Harris »

Jersey Girl wrote:Now, Loran...this thread was directed to ex-LDS. It was a serious inquiry. And what do you do with it? You come in to disrupt the alleged and much hoped for train of thought. When you become ex-LDS please feel free to offer the issue that led to your exit. Until then, kindly get yourself the hell out of the thread if you have nothing else to contribute but derailment. Do unto others, Loran...is that how I handled your threads on homosexuality? Of course you are under no obligation whatsoever to meet any request I make to you here. I left my bullseye over on Z so I won't be letting you use me or these threads for target practice without challenging you.

Jersey Girl


We can always hope he sees the light. But perhaps his persecution here is a last ditch attempt at railing against the powers of darkness, so HF will see his dedication and restore his testimony to him.
Each one has to find his peace from within. And peace to be real must be unaffected by outside circumstances. -Ghandi
_Who Knows
_Emeritus
Posts: 2455
Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 6:09 pm

Post by _Who Knows »

The thing that started me down the path was finding out that if i had gone through the temple just one year earlier, I would have had to act out slitting my throat.
WK: "Joseph Smith asserted that the Book of Mormon peoples were the original inhabitants of the americas"
Will Schryver: "No, he didn’t." 3/19/08
Still waiting for Will to back this up...
_Vici
_Emeritus
Posts: 12
Joined: Mon Nov 06, 2006 10:43 pm

Post by _Vici »

For me the most bothersome thing is probably Joseph Smith's marriages to young teens.

I could probably overlook that if they would just decide that cannabis is an acceptable "wholesome herb".
Post Reply