truth dancer wrote:I have a ton of respect for Clark. I have come across few apologists who can honestly look at their research, admit mistakes, rethink conclusions, and be open to honest criticism and new ideas.
~dancer~
Same here. I thought his response to beastie was impressive.
Hey, Beastie, thanks for that. Quite interesting, to be sure.
Does anyone know where one can get a copy of Stephen's, "Incidents of Travel..."? It's obviously quite old. If anyone knows where it can be found on the net, if at all, please, I would appreciate a heads up.
I detest my loose style and my libertine sentiments. I thank God, who has removed from my eyes the veil... Adrian Beverland
gramps wrote:Hey, Beastie, thanks for that. Quite interesting, to be sure.
Does anyone know where one can get a copy of Stephen's, "Incidents of Travel..."? It's obviously quite old. If anyone knows where it can be found on the net, if at all, please, I would appreciate a heads up.
Given the current atmosphere around here, I'm sure I'll be called a moron and a liar, but no substantive responses will be forthcoming.
Agreed. When you don't have facts to back you up, all that is left is name calling. I find it interesting that you posted this years ago and no responses at all from any of the apologists. I guess it's better to ignore and hope it fades away fast. LOL
Themis wrote:Agreed. When you don't have facts to back you up, all that is left is name calling. I find it interesting that you posted this years ago and no responses at all from any of the apologists. I guess it's better to ignore and hope it fades away fast. LOL
I don't know how one is supposed to respond. The claims Clark made clearly don't hold up to scrutiny.
Themis wrote:Agreed. When you don't have facts to back you up, all that is left is name calling. I find it interesting that you posted this years ago and no responses at all from any of the apologists. I guess it's better to ignore and hope it fades away fast. LOL
I don't know how one is supposed to respond. The claims Clark made clearly don't hold up to scrutiny.
I guess that is why no apologists tried to come to his rescue. Better to ignore and hope it goes away. Kinda reminds me of the church's strategy with the priesthood ban and polygamy.