A Challenge

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_moksha
_Emeritus
Posts: 22508
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 8:42 pm

Post by _moksha »

Channeling Dunamis:

You have all been warned repeatedly. Take it over to Mormon Discussions were they tolerate both humor and diverse thought. WE are here for our LDS posters at the Maxwell Institute. You are now all banned. ~ Juliann
Cry Heaven and let loose the Penguins of Peace
_The Dude
_Emeritus
Posts: 2976
Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 3:16 am

Post by _The Dude »

Methinks I see a little bit of bias in your position, Br Inks, and in those who think like you among the ministers of Scieigion (that's a word I've made up to express how science is just another religion, and you are one of it's high-priests).

1. Why can't you admit that bias is coloring your analysis of the kitten/woodchipper question?

2. The cracks are showing.

3. Don't ask me to get to the point, because I don't have to have one.

4. I know where you live and what car you drive. Does my heavy breathing make you paranoid?
_Runtu
_Emeritus
Posts: 16721
Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2006 5:06 am

Post by _Runtu »

The Dude wrote:Methinks I see a little bit of bias in your position, Br Inks, and in those who think like you among the ministers of Scieigion (that's a word I've made up to express how science is just another religion, and you are one of it's high-priests).

1. Why can't you admit that bias is coloring your analysis of the kitten/woodchipper question?

2. The cracks are showing.

3. Don't ask me to get to the point, because I don't have to have one.

4. I know where you live and what car you drive. Does my heavy breathing make you paranoid?


I have to confess that I always read his moniker as meaning one of two things:

1. He hated BYU.
2. He represented the sum total of hate emanating from BYU.

Now I know he just hates you. ;-)
Runtu's Rincón

If you just talk, I find that your mouth comes out with stuff. -- Karl Pilkington
_Mister Scratch
_Emeritus
Posts: 5604
Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 8:13 pm

Post by _Mister Scratch »

Channeling DCP:

While I am quite certain that, in certain circles, such as Dr. Shades' Obsession Board and the oddly named Recovery Board, I will be pilloried as being the offensive and lying swine that I am, after considerable deliberation with my colleague and friend, the esteemed Professor Hamblin, I have come to the conclusion that, while kittens are demonstrably nice, they are, in fact, appropriately holy woodchipper fodder. This is not to say, of course, that the negation of not knowing the illusory nature of this non-trial of nothingness is doctrinal, per se.

Then again, as I am frequently reminded by a certain Canadian rock musician, I am a donut-addicted slob and a liar.
_CaliforniaKid
_Emeritus
Posts: 4247
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2007 8:47 am

Post by _CaliforniaKid »

You are all guilty of presentism. You are reading your twenty-first century conceptions of kitten-chipping back onto the 19th century. In the 19th century, cats had a much shorter lifespan, so they ceased to be considered "kittens" at a much younger age. Therefore, tossing a six-month-old cat into a wood chipper would not have been considered kitten-chipping in the 19th century. So Joseph Smith is not guilty of kitten-chipping.

-Nighthawke

------------------------------

Nighthawke,

Regardless of whether we define a six-month old cat as a "kitten," wouldn't throwing any cat into a wood chipper have been considered immoral by all 19th-century people?

-CaliforniaKid

------------------------------

CaliforniaKid,

The topic was kitten-chipping. Why are you confusing the issue with your logic? You are reading your twenty-first century conceptions of kitten-chipping back onto the 19th century. In the 19th century, cats had a much shorter lifespan, so they ceased to be considered "kittens" at a much younger age. Therefore, tossing a six-month-old cat into a wood chipper would not have been considered kitten-chipping in the 19th century. So Joseph Smith is not guilty of kitten-chipping.

You obviously harbor an anti-Mormon bias. Why are you so determined to slander an innocent man? We don't criticize you and your filthy rock-music churches, so why do you criticize ours?

-Nighthawke
_CaliforniaKid
_Emeritus
Posts: 4247
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2007 8:47 am

Post by _CaliforniaKid »

The Dude wrote:Methinks I see a little bit of bias in your position, Br Inks, and in those who think like you among the ministers of Scieigion (that's a word I've made up to express how science is just another religion, and you are one of it's high-priests).

1. Why can't you admit that bias is coloring your analysis of the kitten/woodchipper question?

2. The cracks are showing.

3. Don't ask me to get to the point, because I don't have to have one.

4. I know where you live and what car you drive. Does my heavy breathing make you paranoid?


5. Say hello to your zebrafish for me.

YnotH8
_The Dude
_Emeritus
Posts: 2976
Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 3:16 am

Post by _The Dude »

CaliforniaKid wrote:5. Say hello to your zebrafish for me.

YnotH8


LOL. I'm glad you and Runtu could tell who I was channeling.
_Who Knows
_Emeritus
Posts: 2455
Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 6:09 pm

Post by _Who Knows »

The Dude wrote:
CaliforniaKid wrote:5. Say hello to your zebrafish for me.

YnotH8


LOL. I'm glad you and Runtu could tell who I was channeling.


Man, I must be RRRREEEAAALLLL SSSLLLLOOOWWW. I was wondering wtf you guys were talking about.
WK: "Joseph Smith asserted that the Book of Mormon peoples were the original inhabitants of the americas"
Will Schryver: "No, he didn’t." 3/19/08
Still waiting for Will to back this up...
_Bond...James Bond
_Emeritus
Posts: 4627
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 4:49 am

Post by _Bond...James Bond »

Who Knows wrote:Man, I must be RRRREEEAAALLLL SSSLLLLOOOWWW. I was wondering wtf you guys were talking about.


You weren't the only one.

FYI for the smart guys: You have to put (channeling *name) so that we get the joke.

(channeling charity)

You would know if you had the Spirit Bond. As it is you don't so you don't know any of the special things I know. How many fingers am I holding up? You don't know because you don't have the Spirit.
"Whatever appears to be against the Book of Mormon is going to be overturned at some time in the future. So we can be pretty open minded."-charity 3/7/07
_asbestosman
_Emeritus
Posts: 6215
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 10:32 pm

Post by _asbestosman »

The Dude wrote:2. The cracks are showing.


Image
That's General Leo. He could be my friend if he weren't my enemy.
eritis sicut dii
I support NCMO
Post Reply