SeN wrote:I was amused during the break in today’s Interpreter Foundation “Temple on Mount Zion” conference — a break that I mostly employed to read through a lengthy new blog entry from Drs. Royal Skousen and Stanford Carmack for imminent posting on the Interpreter website — to see a characteristically dismissive comment from one particularly dedicated critic of mine. In it, he responds to the publication, yesterday, of my most recent Interpreter volume introduction (“It Came from Beyond”). He claims to discern a recent decline of energy at the Interpreter Foundation, a slowing and a sluggishness that, I assume, is to be viewed as an indicator that we’re beginning to fail.
Well, that's *sort of* what I said. Readers are welcome to simply scroll up, but to refresh your memory, this is what I said:
It's interesting that Dr. Peterson omits the bit about himself. It's especially interesting when you consider it in light of the new information that's come to light about his "meeting" with the Patheos heads. But his remarks continue:I don't know about you, but I've noticed that activity related to the "Mormon Interpreter" blog and its leadership seem to be, well, slowing.
It's "derived" from the fact that activity on "Sic et Non" has slowed significantly--a fact seemingly reinforced by this "meeting" with Patheos leadership, who clearly have demanded editorial changes in the way that the blog is being run.SeN wrote:I’m not sure whence he derives this supposed impression. Perhaps it stems from a striking recent reduction in our pace of publication: Whereas we’ve occasionally published two or even three articles per week and have never failed, since August 2012, to publish at least one, our productivity has plummeted in recent weeks to the fairly consistent publication of at least two weekly journal articles. On the other hand, his perception may come from the supposed fact that, as he himself has also claimed to perceive, one of our mainstays, John Gee — who spoke in the first of today’s two conference sessions and chaired the second — is moving away from his long-time defense of the Book of Abraham. (If Dr. Gee is giving up on defending the Book of Moses, I’ve entirely missed it.)
Our slow fading is also perhaps suggested by today’s Interpreter Foundation conference, as well as by these two new items that were posted earlier today on the Interpreter Foundation’s website:
“Videos Available for the 2020 Book of Moses Conference: Tracing Ancient Threads in the Book of Moses”
“Book of Moses Essays #28: Enoch’s Grand Vision: The Weeping of Enoch (Moses 7:28–43)”
Sigh.
And I have to chuckle about the bit here on John Gee. So, I guess the message we were supposed to take away is that Smoot is going to function as a kind of Robin to Gee's Batman? Okay--sure. It'll be fun to watch, I'm sure.