The Many Faces of Ray A

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_Mister Scratch
_Emeritus
Posts: 5604
Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 8:13 pm

Post by _Mister Scratch »

Ray A wrote:You are twisting what they say just like you twist what I say. I know DCP and do not take his words out of context like you do. In spite of constant clarifications, from his own mouth, backed up by his email to Dr. Shades, you continue to spout ridiculous conspiracy theories like DCP masterminding the downfall of Quinn.


No, Ray. I was interested primarily in learning the truth. Did we get this? No. Instead, we got more obfuscation and bizarre little "insider" hints from DCP. Rather than clearing himself of the charge of "gossipmongering," he inadvertantly supplied myself and others with evidence that there was a BKP-fueled campaign to destroy Quinn's life. Was DCP very influential in the overall scheme of things? No, that doesn't appear to be the case. Did DCP screw up when he boasted about his "insider" knowledge on the FAIRboard? Yes, absolutely. It was rotten of him to spread the rumors.

This is completely and utterly ridiculous, and despite clear and contrary clarifications from him you and Rollo continue to base your conclusions on your innuendo and speculative vilification. This is why, at one stage, he had flirted with the idea of legal proceedings, because you and Rollo are his chief and false accusers, and this wrong accusation stinks in the eyes of fair-minded people.


Gee, does it "stink" like the accusation he made against me, which got me banned from the FAIRboard? You know, Ray, I once publicly offered to take down the entire blog, if only he would apologize for this. But, he did not take me up on it. What a pity.
_Ray A

Post by _Ray A »

Mister Scratch wrote:
Gee, does it "stink" like the accusation he made against me, which got me banned from the FAIRboard? You know, Ray, I once publicly offered to take down the entire blog, if only he would apologize for this. But, he did not take me up on it. What a pity.


Good night, Scratch. We will deal with all this in detail later. Okay? I promise. We will get to the bottom of all of this.
_Mister Scratch
_Emeritus
Posts: 5604
Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 8:13 pm

Post by _Mister Scratch »

Ray A wrote:
Mister Scratch wrote:
Gee, does it "stink" like the accusation he made against me, which got me banned from the FAIRboard? You know, Ray, I once publicly offered to take down the entire blog, if only he would apologize for this. But, he did not take me up on it. What a pity.


Good night, Scratch. We will deal with all this in detail later. Okay? I promise. We will get to the bottom of all of this.


No, Ray. I'm afraid I don't have the patience to go through all the mind-numbing details of this yet again. DCP is never going to apologize. It's as simple as that.
_Ray A

Post by _Ray A »

Mister Scratch wrote:Gee, does it "stink" like the accusation he made against me, which got me banned from the FAIRboard? You know, Ray, I once publicly offered to take down the entire blog, if only he would apologize for this. But, he did not take me up on it. What a pity.


You really are bitter about this, aren't you? Stroke my ego and I might have a talk to Juliann, a.k.a. "Dunamis".

This is really good night!
_Mister Scratch
_Emeritus
Posts: 5604
Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 8:13 pm

Post by _Mister Scratch »

Ray A wrote:
Mister Scratch wrote:Gee, does it "stink" like the accusation he made against me, which got me banned from the FAIRboard? You know, Ray, I once publicly offered to take down the entire blog, if only he would apologize for this. But, he did not take me up on it. What a pity.


You really are bitter about this, aren't you? Stroke my ego and I might have a talk to Juliann, a.k.a. "Dunamis".

This is really good night!


Ray---I genuinely hope that your repeated refrain about your ego "getting stroked" has a palliative effect on your emotional instability. It's clear that you've become completely unhinged, and that you are seriously embarrassed at having your two-facedness exposed.
_Rollo Tomasi
_Emeritus
Posts: 4085
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 12:27 pm

Post by _Rollo Tomasi »

Ray A wrote:This is why, at one stage, he had flirted with the idea of legal proceedings, because you and Rollo are his chief and false accusers, and this wrong accusation stinks in the eyes of fair-minded people.

BS. His own words damned him, without any help from Mr. Scratch, Shades, or me.
"Moving beyond apologist persuasion, LDS polemicists furiously (and often fraudulently) attack any non-traditional view of Mormonism. They don't mince words -- they mince the truth."

-- Mike Quinn, writing of the FARMSboys, in "Early Mormonism and the Magic World View," p. x (Rev. ed. 1998)
_Ray A

Post by _Ray A »

Mister Scratch wrote:Ray---I genuinely hope that your repeated refrain about your ego "getting stroked" has a palliative effect on your emotional instability. It's clear that you've become completely unhinged, and that you are seriously embarrassed at having your two-facedness exposed.


Not at all Scratch. I honestly find it laughable. I genuinely hope you'll refrain from your repeated use of "the aptly named MADboards" and "the Good Professor". You have a very ironic way.

You apparently don't understand what "two faced" means. Having a view in 2003, and a different view in 2007, is not "two faced". Two faced is belonging to a church you don't believe in, calling its leaders "pious frauds", saying things here you'd never say in church, and posting anonymously so you are not exposed for the fraud you are.
_Ray A

Post by _Ray A »

Rollo Tomasi wrote:BS. His own words damned him, without any help from Mr. Scratch, Shades, or me.


According to you. I have read his posted words and private explanations, and evidences he presented, and you are the one doing the mind-reading.
_Mister Scratch
_Emeritus
Posts: 5604
Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 8:13 pm

Post by _Mister Scratch »

Ray A wrote:
Mister Scratch wrote:Ray---I genuinely hope that your repeated refrain about your ego "getting stroked" has a palliative effect on your emotional instability. It's clear that you've become completely unhinged, and that you are seriously embarrassed at having your two-facedness exposed.


Not at all Scratch. I honestly find it laughable. I genuinely hope you'll refrain from your repeated use of "the aptly named MADboards" and "the Good Professor". You have a very ironic way.


Ah, so *that* upsets you?? What on earth, Ray? Why would you get so bent out of shape over *that*? And if so, why would you not be campaigning against the unrelenting unfairness and immorality of "the aptly named MADboards"??? See, I think that you are just irritated about the fact that I have touched on a basic, unpleasant truth about your beloved Mopologists.

You apparently don't understand what "two faced" means. Having a view in 2003, and a different view in 2007, is not "two faced". Two faced is belonging to a church you don't believe in, calling its leaders "pious frauds", saying things here you'd never say in church, and posting anonymously so you are not exposed for the fraud you are.


And which of those things have I done, Ray? Moreover, which of those things have YOU done???
_Rollo Tomasi
_Emeritus
Posts: 4085
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 12:27 pm

Post by _Rollo Tomasi »

Ray A wrote:
Rollo Tomasi wrote:BS. His own words damned him, without any help from Mr. Scratch, Shades, or me.


According to you. I have read his posted words and private explanations, and evidences he presented, and you are the one doing the mind-reading.

We'll just have to agree to disagree on this one.
"Moving beyond apologist persuasion, LDS polemicists furiously (and often fraudulently) attack any non-traditional view of Mormonism. They don't mince words -- they mince the truth."

-- Mike Quinn, writing of the FARMSboys, in "Early Mormonism and the Magic World View," p. x (Rev. ed. 1998)
Post Reply