What two words should NEVER go together?

Post by **_Coggins7** » Sat Jul 07, 2007 1:47 am

Anti-Mormon Homo Sapien

Now, anti-Mormon and homosexual may go together just dandy (ducking...)

Post by **_KimberlyAnn** » Sat Jul 07, 2007 3:07 am

silentkid wrote: I didn't say it was. I just said that those two words shouldn't be said aloud. Why? I don't know. The word moist just sounds weird. The word panties sounds weird as well. Both words, in combination, sound doubly weird.

I don't think the word "panties" sounds weird. I think it sounds sexy! Panties. Panties. Panties!

Did you have a traumatic experience with panties that soured you to them? My experience with panties has been wonderful, especially after wearing garments for years and years. I love panties. I like buying them and seeing them in my pantie drawer and putting them on and even taking them off. I'm sorry you have pantie issues. They're really quite lovely. ;)

Here's two words that just can't ever go together: Sexy Garments. That should get you over your pantie problem! Forget moist panties. Moist garments: Yuck!

KA

Post by **_silentkid** » Sat Jul 07, 2007 5:02 am

KimberlyAnn wrote:I don't think the word "panties" sounds weird. I think it sounds sexy! Panties. Panties. Panties!

LOL!

Did you have a traumatic experience with panties that soured you to them?

Nope. I just think the word sounds weird. It's probably something like that scene in Black Sheep where Chris Farley and David Spade are stoned and talking about how weird the word road sounds. Ro-add. Sour panties. ;)

My experience with panties has been wonderful, especially after wearing garments for years and years. I love panties. I like buying them and seeing them in my pantie drawer and putting them on and even taking them off.

Congratulations!

I'm sorry you have pantie issues. They're really quite lovely. ;)

Again, my only issue with panties is the word, not the object. I need to refer you to Umberto Eco's analysis of semiotics. I stopped wearing the garments four years ago. FREEDOM! Now I wear boxers. Moist boxers.

Here's two words that just can't ever go together: Sexy Garments. That should get you over your pantie problem! Forget moist panties. Moist garments: Yuck!

KA

I agree.

Post by **_KimberlyAnn** » Sat Jul 07, 2007 5:23 am

silentkid wrote:Nope. I just think the word sounds weird. It's probably something like that scene in Black Sheep where Chris Farley and David Spade are stoned and talking about how weird the word road sounds. Ro-add. Sour panties. ;)

Oh, I get it alright. Paaaaanties sounds weird. Pannnnnties. Panteeeeeeez. Pantease! Sour green apple pantease...

KA

Post by **_Dr. Shades** » Sat Jul 07, 2007 5:53 am

Uhh, thanks for that.

Now that we all have that out of our systems, what two words should never go together?

Post by **_silentkid** » Sat Jul 07, 2007 4:22 pm

Dr. Shades wrote:Uhh, thanks for that.

Sorry, Shades.

Here's another one:

INTELLEGENT DESIGN

Post by **_Mr. Coffee** » Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:43 pm

Coggins7 wrote:Anti-Mormon Homo Sapien

Homosapien is one word, dumbass.

Oh, and on topic...

Military Intelligence

I am disappointed that no one has posted that oxymoron yet.

Post by **_barrelomonkeys** » Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:56 pm

Mr. Coffee wrote:
Coggins7 wrote:Anti-Mormon Homo Sapien

Homosapien is one word, dumbass.

Actually it's not. It's two.

_Yoda · Post by **_Yoda** » Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:58 pm

Hmmm...

Male Domination
Summer School (sorry...I'm teaching a summer session right now and feeling sorry for myself. LOL)

Post by **_Mr. Coffee** » Mon Jul 09, 2007 5:05 pm

barrelomonkeys wrote:
Mr. Coffee wrote:
Coggins7 wrote:Anti-Mormon Homo Sapien

Homosapien is one word, dumbass.

Actually it's not. It's two.

Well, I guess I shall have to write a sternly worded letter to Mirriam damned Webster and the OED for listing it as a SINGLE WORD.

I've got both and they say it's one word.

Hmmm... How about I being the letter with "Dear Assholes, you got a word wrong, strong message follows..."?