Dart and Pumple debate from "Mad posters you want on MD

Post by **_Blixa** » Wed Jul 18, 2007 3:56 pm

Personal vendettas carried out across online boards are also lame and boorish.

Post by **_Pumplehoober** » Wed Jul 18, 2007 4:04 pm

Blixa wrote:Personal vendettas carried out across online boards are also lame and boorish.

How ironic. Isn't the entire point of this forum to provide a place to insult Dr. Daniel Peterson and Jullian?

I suppose to the simple minded cockbite might be funny, but eventually maturity demands that penis and fart jokes be relegated to the bathroom where they belong.

Post by **_Blixa** » Wed Jul 18, 2007 4:08 pm

Pumplehoober wrote:How ironic. Isn't the entire point of this forum to provide a place to insult Dr. Daniel Peterson and Jullian?

So why are you here, pray tell?

Post by **_silentkid** » Wed Jul 18, 2007 4:11 pm

Pumplehoober wrote:I suppose to the simple minded cockbite might be funny, but eventually maturity demands that penis and fart jokes be relegated to the bathroom where they belong.

Do you really want to talk about maturity? Have you ever seen me take part in discussing the character of Juliann or Dr. Peterson? That's one of the things I don't like about this board so I leave those topics alone. You, on the other hand, follow Kevin Graham around the board like a virus. You have no sense of humor, especially if you find toilet humor immature. Lighten up! Nothing is funnier than a well-timed fart.

Post by **_Blixa** » Wed Jul 18, 2007 4:24 pm

Come, silentkid, let us leave this ilk...

_Yoda · Post by **_Yoda** » Wed Jul 18, 2007 4:31 pm

Pumplehoober wrote:How ironic. Isn't the entire point of this forum to provide a place to insult Dr. Daniel Peterson and Jullian?

Actually, no.

This is the purpose of the board...taken from the Home Page:

Mormon Discussions. . . Because we all want the truth.

Here is a place of free discussion. Whether you want to discuss the finer intricacies of doctrine, or whether you want to discuss the truthiness of the church in general, your word will be heard here.

Pro, anti, investigator, questioner, critic, apologetic, no matter what you call yourself, what you have to say, or what your agenda is, you have a place here. We pride ourselves on a minimalistic moderation policy, so that your voice is always heard.

Post by **_Mr. Coffee** » Wed Jul 18, 2007 5:03 pm

Pumplehoober wrote:I suppose to the simple minded cockbite might be funny, but eventually maturity demands that penis and fart jokes be relegated to the bathroom where they belong.

Would you prefer that we call you "snocksniffer" instead, cockbite? Because you seem like the sort of wrenched little asshat that after a long day at the office trying to weasle your way out of a sexual harrassment lawsuit from when you "dropped" loose change to try and sneak a peak at your female co-worker's knickers, you like to sit down, take off those penny loafers, and give your still damp socks a good long sniff to see just how badly you need to invest in some foot powder.

Nah, I'll just call you "cockbite" and be done with it. Not like some self-rightious shitbag who trolls from forum to forum just to slavishly defend their favorite MoPo asswipe is actually worth the investment of a really good custom insult nickname. I mean seriously, when Peterson comes to sudden stop while walking, just how far up his ass does your head fit? Past the ears?

Inquiring minds want to know....

SilentKid wrote:I'm glad this pumblehumper dude got his derailments kicked to the off-topic forum so I can say that his cyberstalking antics are damned lame and boring. He needs to lighten up.

Yeah, I love it when they try to come to the unregulated areas and pull their "I'm such a good person" routine... Not that I know Purplehooter or Pumblemunchin or whatever his damned name is, but it is a lot of fun to just let fly with a good verbal broadside with all nine guns.

Post by **_Pumplehoober** » Wed Jul 18, 2007 9:05 pm

Mr. Coffee wrote:Would you prefer that we call you "snocksniffer" instead, cockbite? Because you seem like the sort of wrenched little asshat....

What I have never understood about such commentary is that it betrays how vapid and dim the individual is making the comment rather than the person such drivel is addressed towards.

This reminds me of the quote…

“It is better to remain silent and thought a fool, than to open your mouth and remove all doubt.”

Post by **_Pumplehoober** » Wed Jul 18, 2007 9:07 pm

liz3564 wrote:
Pumplehoober wrote:How ironic. Isn't the entire point of this forum to provide a place to insult Dr. Daniel Peterson and Jullian?

Actually, no.

This is the purpose of the board...taken from the Home Page:

Well since the Home Page says so it simply MUST be true. What wonderful logic!!!!

Post by **_Mr. Coffee** » Wed Jul 18, 2007 9:31 pm

Pumplehoober wrote:What I have never understood about such commentary is that it betrays how vapid and dim the individual is making the comment rather than the person such drivel is addressed towards.

Wow, is this site becoming a breeding ground for assholes that abuse the "style-over-substance" fallacy or something? So you're saying it's OK to be a condescending little assholes and insult people just as long as you're polite about it, but being honest and forthcoming by using "bad" words isn't?

Now hear this, Fuckleberry...

No one really gives a crap that you are offended by someone saying "cock" in your presense, nor do any of us give a rusty “F” if you think it's lowbrow to call you a "cockbite", cockbite. After all, you seem like someone that bites cock. Spade's a shovel and all that, jackass.

Pumplehoober wrote:This reminds me of the quote…

I got a better one...

"It is better to not be a condescending twat than it is to be an overbearing asshole. At least the asshole's honest."