Congratulations DCP

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_beastie
_Emeritus
Posts: 14216
Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 2:26 am

Post by _beastie »

My memory was correct.

http://www.mormonapologetics.org/index. ... 943&st=140

Ray's post:

I expressed an opinion many "moons" ago on the old FAIRboard, that these negative sentiments could materialise in actual physical violence. I still believe that. I think Dan has put this in very tactful and balanced language, but I would prefer to speak my mind in more forceful language. We cannot always separate expression from actual intent. If the quotes from the OP, which are symptomatic of much of RFM, are any indication, then I am seriously concerned. Tonight I watched two teenaged girls bash up an older man because of a stupid comment he made. When they were finished ten minutes later, he was a mass of blood. These girls were no more than sixteen or seventeen, and with some quick and dismissive wit they could have left the man looking like a fool, but the vindictiveness of the physical attack shocked me. They were only words uttered by a silly old drunk man at the train station, yet it nearly cost his life. Fortunately the police arrived and arrested them. I hope they spend at least 12 months in a juvenile detention centre.

If some dork speaks about "killing Mormon missionaries", I do not care a fig if anyone else sees this as merely words. I take this very seriously. And to all the little minds who think this thread has no substance - THINK AGAIN! And to all of you who quote Jesus, remember that out of the mouth come blasphemies, threats, and bile, which reflect the intentions of the heart. This is a verbal hatred that could one day turn to physical violence. And the more you speak and publish your BILE, the more the sick minds will be encouraged.

And let me have a word with those who encourage this, either by Pilate-like silence, or "free speech", you will have blood on your hands if anyone is physically injured. I abhor and detest the sick sentiments expressed against Dan Peterson, Juliann, or Mormons in general. You have a choice. Speak up, and stop the trashing, or clap your hands in glee.

The point Dan has been trying to make in this thread is that evil bears the face of innocence. Mass murderers can be ordinary "family" men and women who smell flowers and pat their dog, and buy candy for their children. It is the "mass movements" of hate which encourage them to act beyond civility, and beyond their "natural affections".

Call me a prophet of doom if you like, but I have wiped my hands of this hatred, and if you can't see the hatred expressed on RFM, and among many on MDB, then you need an eye test.

Why has Dan brought this to attention in this thread? Because it needs to be brought to attention, so that good and honest people can discern between good and evil. And if you can't, then I leave you to discuss this problem with your Maker someday.

And remember, all you anti-Mormons now stirring hatred and bile against the Church - you will pay an awful price. Keep building your websites of hate, spread the word of hate, and as you sow, you will reap.


Dan's response:

I appreciated the post, Ray. Exactly the point I'm trying to make.



I haven't suggested a relationship between RfM and Nazism. I have, however, suggested that the kind of over-the-top demonization of a people that sometimes occurs (among other places) at RfM is worrisome, and is not unlike the demonization that one would have seen in Der Stürmer.


If I didn't know better, I would say these two people are taking themselves, and these boards, a tad too seriously.
We hate to seem like we don’t trust every nut with a story, but there’s evidence we can point to, and dance while shouting taunting phrases.

Penn & Teller

http://www.mormonmesoamerica.com
_dartagnan
_Emeritus
Posts: 2750
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2006 4:27 pm

Post by _dartagnan »

Everybody that Kevin Graham has challenged is either incompetent or dishonest, they all falsely complain that he distorts their positions, and they all pretend (because they're cowards) that they're sick of dealing with him.


Not everybody Dan. I know misery loves company, but you and Hamblin do not represent "everybody."

It is a documented fact that you rushed onto the scene to encourage Bill to leave immediately, once I proved it was Bill who didn't even know what he had said in his radio interview. This is not a mystery, and there is no ambiguity involved. It is perfectly verifiable for anyone who wants to check it out. He falsely accused me of misrepresenting him the same as you're doing now.

I am perfectly willing to let the substantial record stand and allow the readers to make their own judgments. Unfortunately for you, your self-deprecating humor isn't going to wash all that away.
“All knowledge of reality starts from experience and ends in it...Propositions arrived at by purely logical means are completely empty as regards reality." - Albert Einstein
_Mister Scratch
_Emeritus
Posts: 5604
Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 8:13 pm

Post by _Mister Scratch »

Daniel Peterson wrote:
Rollo Tomasi wrote:Too bad you didn't do the research when you published the article in Sunstone in 1988. I guess that was to be expected of someone with your scholarly prowess.

Too bad you imagine that a two-page book review in a non-technical magazine isn't a two-page book review in a non-technical magazine.

Do you get upset that no touchdowns are scored when you play miniature golf? Are you furious that apple pie doesn't taste like chocolate fudge? Does it irritate you when the engine on your skateboard won't start?


Does it irritate you when your dishonesty is made plain? Do you get upset when you're scolded for engaging in smear tactics?

Give us the citation, or issue a retraction, Dan.
_skippy the dead
_Emeritus
Posts: 1676
Joined: Sat Jan 06, 2007 5:39 am

Post by _skippy the dead »

Jersey Girl wrote:Remember when you were in grade school...or perhaps even middle school and you "got into a fight" with your friend and the kids chose sides? And in the middle of class you passed "hate notes" and shot dirty looks at the other kids?

That's what this thread is.


And too many others.
I may be going to hell in a bucket, babe / But at least I'm enjoying the ride.
-Grateful Dead (lyrics by John Perry Barlow)
_richardMdBorn
_Emeritus
Posts: 1639
Joined: Sat Oct 28, 2006 3:05 am

Post by _richardMdBorn »

Ray A wrote:
richardMdBorn wrote:If that's the spirit that comes from being LDS, I want nothing of it. It's as bad as the protesters LDS like to complain about.


That's just a cop out. You know you wouldn't be LDS for a million other reasons. By the way, when I was a practising LDS - I didn't swear. So your argument falls on its head. If swearing offends you so much - then don't associate with exmos on exmo boards.

Agree?
If you think the swearing's your problem, you have no idea of the hate you are exuding. The swearing is only a manifestation of the depth of your hatred.
_Rollo Tomasi
_Emeritus
Posts: 4085
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 12:27 pm

Post by _Rollo Tomasi »

Daniel Peterson wrote:
Rollo Tomasi wrote:Too bad you didn't do the research when you published the article in Sunstone in 1988. I guess that was to be expected of someone with your scholarly prowess.

Too bad you imagine that a two-page book review in a non-technical magazine isn't a two-page book review in a non-technical magazine.

In other words, folks, Bishop Dan never did the research to back up the "consensus" statement in his 1988 Sunstone review. Just as I suspected.
"Moving beyond apologist persuasion, LDS polemicists furiously (and often fraudulently) attack any non-traditional view of Mormonism. They don't mince words -- they mince the truth."

-- Mike Quinn, writing of the FARMSboys, in "Early Mormonism and the Magic World View," p. x (Rev. ed. 1998)
_harmony
_Emeritus
Posts: 18195
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am

Post by _harmony »

I don't understand why it's so hard to say "That's not what I meant." or "I misspoke. What I meant was.... " or "I obviously didn't articulate my idea well. What I meant was... "

Why this constant need to never be wrong?
_Daniel Peterson
_Emeritus
Posts: 7173
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2007 6:56 pm

Post by _Daniel Peterson »

harmony wrote:I don't understand why it's so hard to say "That's not what I meant." or "I misspoke. What I meant was.... " or "I obviously didn't articulate my idea well. What I meant was... "

Why this constant need to never be wrong?

In this case, at least, I'm not wrong.

I have a need to tell the truth. I won't lie in order to have you praise me for telling the truth.
_Daniel Peterson
_Emeritus
Posts: 7173
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2007 6:56 pm

Post by _Daniel Peterson »

Rollo Tomasi wrote:
Daniel Peterson wrote:
Rollo Tomasi wrote:Too bad you didn't do the research when you published the article in Sunstone in 1988. I guess that was to be expected of someone with your scholarly prowess.

Too bad you imagine that a two-page book review in a non-technical magazine isn't a two-page book review in a non-technical magazine.

In other words, folks, Bishop Dan never did the research to back up the "consensus" statement in his 1988 Sunstone review. Just as I suspected.

The fact that we didn't include exhaustive scholarly footnotes on the controversy surrounding the definition of magic in a two-page book review in a non-scholarly magazine that dealt with other subjects as well proves that we had never done any research on the question of "magic"?

What manifest nonsense.

"Jack didn't provide photographs of Jill at the Yankees game, thus proving that she wasn't there."

I understand that you're trying to taunt me into doing you a favor that you don't even remotely deserve. Please proceed. One definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.
_evolving
_Emeritus
Posts: 172
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 7:17 pm

Post by _evolving »

Daniel Peterson wrote:One definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.


So why do you continue to engage, and post on these type discussions? do you believe something different will happen each time you argue with your critics on BB's -- or -- is this some form of game play, an extreme form of mental masturbation?
Post Reply