bcspace wrote:LOL! The statement was made by a popular homosexual columnist.
Ahh - you quoted someone who has an opinion.
Now THAT'S smart...!
So one homosexual speaks, they speak for not only all homosexuals, but all hetrosexuals too...?!
You're hilarious...
I see you have no science to contradict the references I gave. Your traffic comment shows that you are the one who is spinning (because you have no references).
You are asserting that lesbians
die more often in traffic accidents.Oh man, I feel daft even repeating the claim...
Please show the DATA that demonstrates this.
...not some summary that says 'the data shows this'. Practically every single 'summary' of any data I've seen from the anti-homosexual camp turns out to be absolute guff when you inspect the underlying data for more than a few minutes.
It's a rediculous claim. And if you beleive otherwise, then please show the data...
Then you should be able to provide a reference.
As you wish...
Each of these references give evidence for biological roots of homosexuality and how the evidence relates to the 'conditions in the womb'...
http://www.webmd.com/content/article/22 ... %20Storieshttp://www.economist.com/science/displa ... id=2121955http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0, ... 43,00.htmlhttp://www.yawningbread.org/arch_1997/yax-061.htm(Look at the section 'CONCORDANCE RATE OF HOMOSEXUALITY
BETWEEN BROTHERS AND TWINS' - near the bottom, and read the summmary underneath:)
What conclusions can we draw from these numbers?
Brothers have a higher incidence of homosexuality than chance alone.
Fraternal (dizygotic) twins seem to have an even higher rate of concordance than common brothers. Genetically, fraternal twins are no closer to each other than common brothers so why should their concordance rate be higher? Since the key difference is that they shared the same pregnancy in the mother, this suggests that there is some factor related to the womb or the mother's hormonal balance during a pregnancy.
Identical twins have the highest rate of concordance, strongly suggesting a genetic factor, because they are the only types of brothers who share the same genes. Yet, genes are not the only explanation, because if they were, the concordance rate among identical twins should have been 100 percent.
All the evidence points directly to biological roots of homosexuality, along with social and phycological ones in a minority of cases.
Between 25 percent and 33 percent of relationships between lesbian, gay, bisexual, or transgender partners include abuse, a rate equal to that of heterosexual relationships, according to a 1998 report released by the National Coalition of Anti-Violence Programs (NCAVP).
What exactly is this meant to prove bcspace?!
...the above says that the rate of abuse is EQUAL to that of hetrosexual relationships.
Your claim was that the rate was
higher....perhaps you are forgetting your own words now?
This is what you said:
People who are in any kind of homosexual relationship are far more prone to domestic violence with their partners.
Do you remember saying it? Have you slipped and knocked your head since typing this perhaps?
...no?
Then why have you just provided a reference that states that abuse in homosexual relationships is NO WORSE then hetrosexual relationships.
...is this your way of admitting that you were talking crap? If so, it's welcome. But you could have been a bit more of a man about it, and just admitted it...
Either way, it puts the lie in your implied notion that lesbianism is superior to male homosexuality
It's not superior because abuse within Lesbian relationships happens AT ALL?
Where did you show that abuse in lesbian relationships ISN'T of a lower ratio than hetrosexual relationships?!
You can't even follow your own argument...!
bcspace wrote:a bigot within a bigot you are
Woah.
Deep. Man.