juliann Issues Forth Yet Another Lie

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_Mister Scratch
_Emeritus
Posts: 5604
Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 8:13 pm

juliann Issues Forth Yet Another Lie

Post by _Mister Scratch »

On another thread, Mr. Bond was kind enough to post this juicy tidbit from "The Wrong-Headed Wench":

juliann wrote:That is pretty much all they do there... last I looked anyway. A significant number of threads were about us. I don't like the obscenity and hatespeech there. I would never post there, yeck. But don't think of me as a target, think of me as an integral part of their emerging rituals. Perhaps it is their version of an altar call...or a sacrament of sorts where they all take a bite of our cyberflesh. Whatever it is, it is obviously critical to their sense of well being.
(emphasis added)

It turns out that I know for a fact, on account of my various "little birdies," that juliann has posted on this board. She may even have used multiple aliases, but I know for certain that she has shown up over here as "Mrs. Robbins." So, is she going to retract on MAD? Or just wallow in her de rigueur lies? Inquiring minds want to know!
_barrelomonkeys
_Emeritus
Posts: 3004
Joined: Sat Jun 09, 2007 7:00 pm

Post by _barrelomonkeys »

Why does she read this board if it's such 'yeck'?

I find it odd that those at MAD think the posters here are obsessed with MAD. It appears mutual to me!
_keene
_Emeritus
Posts: 10098
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 7:05 pm

Post by _keene »

Mister Scratch...

Are YOU Julian?
TRUE POST COUNT = (current count) - 10,000 + 469
_Jersey Girl
_Emeritus
Posts: 34407
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:16 am

Post by _Jersey Girl »

She may even have used multiple aliases, but I know for certain that she has shown up over here as "Mrs. Robbins."


Hmmm...how is it that I missed the part of your post that should have said "But i wrongly accused Jersey Girl for posting over here as "Mrs. Robbins". Oh right, it wasn't there.
Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up.
Chinese Proverb
_Gadianton
_Emeritus
Posts: 9947
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2007 5:12 am

Post by _Gadianton »

Yes, a few threads on MDB are devoted to apologetics, and hence also FAIR/MA&D, but is that obsession? Maybe a little, but let's compare to the "more good" foundation which devotes entire websites to ex-Mormon rivals.
Lou Midgley 08/20/2020: "...meat wad," and "cockroach" are pithy descriptions of human beings used by gemli? They were not fashioned by Professor Peterson.

LM 11/23/2018: one can explain away the soul of human beings...as...a Meat Unit, to use Professor Peterson's clever derogatory description of gemli's ideology.
_Trevor
_Emeritus
Posts: 7213
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 6:28 pm

Post by _Trevor »

Gadianton wrote:Yes, a few threads on MDB are devoted to apologetics, and hence also FAIR/MA&D, but is that obsession? Maybe a little, but let's compare to the "more good" foundation which devotes entire websites to ex-Mormon rivals.


Why are the apologists so obsessed with ex-Mormons and so-called anti-Mormons? They devote their whole lives it seems to following what these folks do, talking about them, writing about them. They build up an apologetic orthodoxy that is quite separate from the doctrine of the LDS Church, and then defend it as though it were Church doctrine. In a sense, apologists are a distinct church within the LDS Church, and the ex/anti-Mo is the focus of just about everything they do!

Talk about obsession!
“I was hooked from the start,” Snoop Dogg said. “We talked about the purpose of life, played Mousetrap, and ate brownies. The kids thought it was off the hook, for real.”
_Blixa
_Emeritus
Posts: 8381
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2007 12:45 pm

Post by _Blixa »

Trevor wrote:They build up an apologetic orthodoxy that is quite separate from the doctrine of the LDS Church, and then defend it as though it were Church doctrine. In a sense, apologists are a distinct church within the LDS Church


I think that's nearly true, I do think there is some overlap however.

In the end though, I don't think the distinction matters because apologetics are like FPRs. Even if they don't coincide with the strictist interpretation of what constitutes doctrine, and thus can be dismissed as "just opinion" if they get too far afield, ultimately they serve the interest of The Church on some level or "the brethern" would be doing something about them.
From the Ernest L. Wilkinson Diaries: "ELW dreams he's spattered w/ grease. Hundreds steal his greasy pants."
_The Nehor
_Emeritus
Posts: 11832
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2007 2:05 am

Post by _The Nehor »

keene wrote:Mister Scratch...

Are YOU Julian?


I thought I was Juliann.
"Surely he knows that DCP, The Nehor, Lamanite, and other key apologists..." -Scratch clarifying my status in apologetics
"I admit it; I'm a petty, petty man." -Some Schmo
_Some Schmo
_Emeritus
Posts: 15602
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 2:59 pm

Post by _Some Schmo »

Jersey Girl wrote:
She may even have used multiple aliases, but I know for certain that she has shown up over here as "Mrs. Robbins."


Hmmm...how is it that I missed the part of your post that should have said "But I wrongly accused Jersey Girl for posting over here as "Mrs. Robbins". Oh right, it wasn't there.


Yeah... like you'd ever admit to being wrong yourself.

LOL
God belief is for people who don't want to live life on the universe's terms.
_karl61
_Emeritus
Posts: 2983
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 6:29 pm

Post by _karl61 »

The Nehor wrote:
keene wrote:Mister Scratch...

Are YOU Julian?


I thought I was Juliann.


no, you are mormonmistress from NZ
I want to fly!
Post Reply