fighting looters and throwing rocks at young school girls.??

[_charity]

For those of us who read the whole post, this is at the very bottom.

"If you have read this far, I hope you realize that this is a hoax. Apologies to Mr. Holt and the Signal."

I think some history that LDS people think happened started that/this way.

Or how about some history that anti's and critics think happened started that/this way.

[_karl61]

For those of us who read the whole post, this is at the very bottom.

"If you have read this far, I hope you realize that this is a hoax. Apologies to Mr. Holt and the Signal."

I think some history that LDS people think happened started that/this way.

Or how about some history that anti's and critics think happened started that/this way.

what history might that be? CFR.

[_charity]

Or how about some history that anti's and critics think happened started that/this way.

what history might that be? CFR.

You've got to be joking.

[_Mercury]

For those of us who read the whole post, this is at the very bottom.

"If you have read this far, I hope you realize that this is a hoax. Apologies to Mr. Holt and the Signal."

I think some history that LDS people think happened started that/this way.

Or how about some history that anti's and critics think happened started that/this way.

Oh please. Why don't you start by giving an example? Or are you so used to not having to cite your kooky way of looking at things?

[_charity]

For those of us who read the whole post, this is at the very bottom.

"If you have read this far, I hope you realize that this is a hoax. Apologies to Mr. Holt and the Signal."

I think some history that LDS people think happened started that/this way.

Or how about some history that anti's and critics think happened started that/this way.

Oh please. Why don't you start by giving an example? Or are you so used to not having to cite your kooky way of looking at things?

I realize what this is merc, and styleguy. You are trying to divert from the egg on the faces of all the posters who jumped in without having read the entire post. thought they found something against a Mormon, and popped in.

And why am I supposed to cite an example when styleguy just shoots from the hip and accuses LDS of doing this without any examples?

My response back was more rhetoical. He said LDS do that, I said non-LDS would do that, too.

Are you constitutionally unable to post without insulting at the same time?

[_Polygamy Porter]

I have always thought that rcrockett was and odd duck.

This confirms it.

in my opinion, the guy really has some internal issues that will eventually burst out.

[_charity]

I have always thought that rcrockett was and odd duck.

This confirms it.

in my opinion, the guy really has some internal issues that will eventually burst out.

A perfect example of the model anti-Mormon. Beleive a hoax, repeat it, and add to it.

[Guest]

I have always thought that rcrockett was and odd duck.

This confirms it.

in my opinion, the guy really has some internal issues that will eventually burst out.

A perfect example of the model anti-Mormon. Beleive a hoax, repeat it, and add to it.

You're shi**ing us, right?

"Believe a hoax, repeat it, and add to it."

This is Mormon epistomology in a nutshell.

You are so un-reflective that the irony of your post probably never dawned on you.

So, I'm an "anti," which hoax do I believe?

While you're at it, please describe generally the hoaxes that anti-mormons believe.

To return the favor, here's a partial list the hoaxes you, other apologists, and rank and file members believe:

1. First Vision
2. Book of Mormon
3. PofGP
4. D&C
5. Modern revelation in general
6. "Angel with a flamming sword" (a true test of gullibility)
7. Polygamy in general
8. Prophets
9. Modern prophets
10. Tithing
11. Divinity of JC
12. Resurrection
13. Garments
14. Devil/Satan/Old Scratch/Beelzebub/Lucifer
15. Bible
16. Sin

The list goes on and on.

[_beastie]

A perfect example of the model anti-Mormon. Beleive a hoax, repeat it, and add to it.

OMG!!! This is the funniest thing I've read yet!

[_charity]

I really needed a good laugh this morning.

Someone posts a hoax. The first few posters on the thread didn't even care enough to read the link and that it was a hoax and jumped in with criticisms of a Mormon based on the hoax. I call it to their attention. And then they try to turn it around on me.

Won't work. You get caught with your pants down , you should pull them up before you start mocking somebody else.

Can't you guys just say, "Oops, I was wrong. Sorry. I will be more careful in reading the link provided before I jump off a bridge with a premature opinion."