Ray A.....total nut.

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_beastie
_Emeritus
Posts: 14216
Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 2:26 am

Post by _beastie »

Could someone tell me why this, now, Six Day thread is important?


Who said it's important?
We hate to seem like we don’t trust every nut with a story, but there’s evidence we can point to, and dance while shouting taunting phrases.

Penn & Teller

http://www.mormonmesoamerica.com
_harmony
_Emeritus
Posts: 18195
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am

Post by _harmony »

beastie wrote:Ray,

I truly believe DCP loves the attention he gets from the exmormon community. He refers to it himself quite frequently. And you are incorrect about Harmony chasing him down, I've seen him lash out at her quite unprovoked.


Thanks, Trix. He does have a low flashpoint.
_Mister Scratch
_Emeritus
Posts: 5604
Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 8:13 pm

Post by _Mister Scratch »

Ray A wrote:
Mister Scratch wrote:If this were genuinely true, then you would have a big problem with DCP's "leaking" of private information pertaining to Mike Quinn. You would staunchly oppose the Good Professor's endless gossipmongering and trash-talking.


Here we go again. This is your imagination, in spite of numerous clarifications from DCP himself.


Uh, no. What we have are repeated instances of *spin* from DCP. Go take a gander at my blog, Ray. All the evidence damning DCP is there for all to see.

Mister Scratch wrote:What "real pain," Ray? Who is genuinely in pain? CFR!


Don't "CFR" me, Scratch. You have to be kidding! When someone CFR's you, you TTR them (twist the references), to what you want to believe!! Not what the truth is.


So.... I guess this means that you don't have any evidence. Big surprise.


Mister Scratch wrote:Well, despite your dishonest warping of events in your above posting, it is easy enough to imagine DCP being very perturbed by the sort of statement you made. Quite sick, Ray.


It's no where near as sick as your character assassination.


You think that "YOUR MISSIONARIES ARE DEAD" is less nasty that showing evidence that DCP engaged in gossipmongering against Mike Quinn? Okay....


Mister Scratch wrote:I have not lied in any of my postings on DCP. In fact, I have followed your above rule quite well: I have stuck only to things which The Good Professor has posted online.


Consider submitting that as a joke to Reader's Digest.


You are like Travis Bickle, Ray---completely whacked out and insane.
_Ray A

Post by _Ray A »

Mister Scratch wrote:You are like Travis Bickle, Ray---completely whacked out and insane.


Scratch, your comments amuse me. I really can't take you seriously. If I got attacked from someone with credibility, it would probably make me rethink. But the fact is, old boy, you don't have any credibility with me.

Are you really, really, a member of the Church? Tell me about yourself, Scratch. I'm dying with curiosity. You talk about "another strike against Joseph Smith", and such things.

If you don't believe any of it - do you have the balls to resign?

More to the point: Do you even have balls? Some seem to think you're female. That's an indication of how little is known about the Chief Accuser of Others.
_Chap
_Emeritus
Posts: 14190
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 10:23 am

Post by _Chap »

Ray A wrote:
Mister Scratch wrote:You are like Travis Bickle, Ray---completely whacked out and insane.


Scratch, your comments amuse me. I really can't take you seriously. If I got attacked from someone with credibility, it would probably make me rethink. But the fact is, old boy, you don't have any credibility with me.

Are you really, really, a member of the Church? Tell me about yourself, Scratch. I'm dying with curiosity. You talk about "another strike against Joseph Smith", and such things.

If you don't believe any of it - do you have the balls to resign?

More to the point: Do you even have balls? Some seem to think you're female. That's an indication of how little is known about the Chief Accuser of Others.


Why is a poster's gender relevant to any evaluation of her/his opinions?

I find your equation of the possession of testicles to courage bizarre. Can you not rise above this silly schoolboy stuff?
_beastie
_Emeritus
Posts: 14216
Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 2:26 am

Post by _beastie »

(drumroll...) This, ladies and gentlemen, is what is known as pride. It is also immersed deeply in the aromatic waters of hubris.

"Up yours God, I'm not going to worship anyone who is actually going to hold me accountable for the choices I made while on earth."

I couldn't have done this better myself.

Now Beastie, are you ready to discuss this at a deeper and more intellectually honest level?


by the way, coggins, if you were to discover that the EV God is the true God, and he intends to send sincere Mormons to hell to burn for eternity for believing the wrong thing, would you respect, worship, and love HIM?
We hate to seem like we don’t trust every nut with a story, but there’s evidence we can point to, and dance while shouting taunting phrases.

Penn & Teller

http://www.mormonmesoamerica.com
_beastie
_Emeritus
Posts: 14216
Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 2:26 am

Post by _beastie »

Why is a poster's gender relevant to any evaluation of her/his opinions?

I find your equation of the possession of testicles to courage bizarre. Can you not rise above this silly schoolboy stuff?


I suspect he's trying to lend support to crocket, since crocket supported him. Crocket recently tried to insult scratch by calling him "Ms. Scratch" repeatedly. Some people of a certain bent think that it's an insult to a man to call him a woman.
We hate to seem like we don’t trust every nut with a story, but there’s evidence we can point to, and dance while shouting taunting phrases.

Penn & Teller

http://www.mormonmesoamerica.com
_Bond...James Bond
_Emeritus
Posts: 4627
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 4:49 am

Post by _Bond...James Bond »

Jersey Girl wrote:Could someone tell me why this, now, Six Day thread is important?


Cause I started it...and much like King Midas....everything I touch turns to gold. (Something of a double edged sword really...witness: "GOLDMEMBER")
"Whatever appears to be against the Book of Mormon is going to be overturned at some time in the future. So we can be pretty open minded."-charity 3/7/07
_Mister Scratch
_Emeritus
Posts: 5604
Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 8:13 pm

Post by _Mister Scratch »

Ray A wrote:
Mister Scratch wrote:You are like Travis Bickle, Ray---completely whacked out and insane.


Scratch, your comments amuse me. I really can't take you seriously. If I got attacked from someone with credibility, it would probably make me rethink. But the fact is, old boy, you don't have any credibility with me.


I apparently have enough "credibility" to cause you to flip out and go on profane rampages. I apparently have enough "credibility" for you to claim that my accounts of DCP's malfeasance are somehow worse that your appalling "MISSIONARIES" comment.

In any case, this only proves what I have been saying all along: you need your ego stroked, and will flip flop under the right circumstances. If I told you more about myself, kissed your butt, etc., ala DCP, I'm sure that you'd be ripping on LDS again in no time.

Are you really, really, a member of the Church? Tell me about yourself, Scratch. I'm dying with curiosity. You talk about "another strike against Joseph Smith", and such things.


Why does any of that matter, Ray? If you can provide me with a good explanation, I just might tell you.
_Ray A

Post by _Ray A »

Mister Scratch wrote:In any case, this only proves what I have been saying all along: you need your ego stroked, and will flip flop under the right circumstances. If I told you more about myself, kissed your butt, etc., ala DCP, I'm sure that you'd be ripping on LDS again in no time.


Go ahead and try it. You don't "get it", buddy, my respect for you is ZERO. And the only thing that will change that is when you stop your character assassination.


Mister Scratch wrote:Why does any of that matter, Ray? If you can provide me with a good explanation, I just might tell you.



Explanations have been provided ad nauseam. If you're going to scrutinise and judge the character of other people, then they have a right to know WHO is doing the judging! Unless you're Stalin, or Mao.
Post Reply