Could someone tell me why this, now, Six Day thread is important?
Who said it's important?
Could someone tell me why this, now, Six Day thread is important?
Ray A wrote:Mister Scratch wrote:If this were genuinely true, then you would have a big problem with DCP's "leaking" of private information pertaining to Mike Quinn. You would staunchly oppose the Good Professor's endless gossipmongering and trash-talking.
Here we go again. This is your imagination, in spite of numerous clarifications from DCP himself.
Mister Scratch wrote:What "real pain," Ray? Who is genuinely in pain? CFR!
Don't "CFR" me, Scratch. You have to be kidding! When someone CFR's you, you TTR them (twist the references), to what you want to believe!! Not what the truth is.
Mister Scratch wrote:Well, despite your dishonest warping of events in your above posting, it is easy enough to imagine DCP being very perturbed by the sort of statement you made. Quite sick, Ray.
It's no where near as sick as your character assassination.
Mister Scratch wrote:I have not lied in any of my postings on DCP. In fact, I have followed your above rule quite well: I have stuck only to things which The Good Professor has posted online.
Consider submitting that as a joke to Reader's Digest.
Mister Scratch wrote:You are like Travis Bickle, Ray---completely whacked out and insane.
Ray A wrote:Mister Scratch wrote:You are like Travis Bickle, Ray---completely whacked out and insane.
Scratch, your comments amuse me. I really can't take you seriously. If I got attacked from someone with credibility, it would probably make me rethink. But the fact is, old boy, you don't have any credibility with me.
Are you really, really, a member of the Church? Tell me about yourself, Scratch. I'm dying with curiosity. You talk about "another strike against Joseph Smith", and such things.
If you don't believe any of it - do you have the balls to resign?
More to the point: Do you even have balls? Some seem to think you're female. That's an indication of how little is known about the Chief Accuser of Others.
(drumroll...) This, ladies and gentlemen, is what is known as pride. It is also immersed deeply in the aromatic waters of hubris.
"Up yours God, I'm not going to worship anyone who is actually going to hold me accountable for the choices I made while on earth."
I couldn't have done this better myself.
Now Beastie, are you ready to discuss this at a deeper and more intellectually honest level?
Why is a poster's gender relevant to any evaluation of her/his opinions?
I find your equation of the possession of testicles to courage bizarre. Can you not rise above this silly schoolboy stuff?
Jersey Girl wrote:Could someone tell me why this, now, Six Day thread is important?
Ray A wrote:Mister Scratch wrote:You are like Travis Bickle, Ray---completely whacked out and insane.
Scratch, your comments amuse me. I really can't take you seriously. If I got attacked from someone with credibility, it would probably make me rethink. But the fact is, old boy, you don't have any credibility with me.
Are you really, really, a member of the Church? Tell me about yourself, Scratch. I'm dying with curiosity. You talk about "another strike against Joseph Smith", and such things.
Mister Scratch wrote:In any case, this only proves what I have been saying all along: you need your ego stroked, and will flip flop under the right circumstances. If I told you more about myself, kissed your butt, etc., ala DCP, I'm sure that you'd be ripping on LDS again in no time.
Mister Scratch wrote:Why does any of that matter, Ray? If you can provide me with a good explanation, I just might tell you.