"700 geographic references straight"

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_karl61
_Emeritus
Posts: 2983
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 6:29 pm

"700 geographic references straight"

Post by _karl61 »

I was reading over at MA&D and there was a post by a Mr. Kevin Christensen of Pittsburg Penn, about Book of Mormon Archaeology and he wrote:

"This is the Idiot Savant Joseph. A savant keeping the over 700 geographic references straight while dictating while fabricating, and then conviently turning idiot when asked about the text later."

what 700 geographic references? I thought that nobody has ever been able to remotely pin a place for the setting of the Book of Mormon. If you have 700 georgraphic references and you don't know where you are or what is being described then something is wrong.

here is the link; you need to use your brain to get there.

http://www.mormonapologetics.org/index. ... 455&st=100
I want to fly!
_Who Knows
_Emeritus
Posts: 2455
Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 6:09 pm

Re: "700 geographic references straight"

Post by _Who Knows »

thestyleguy wrote:"This is the Idiot Savant Joseph. A savant keeping the over 700 geographic references straight while dictating while fabricating, and then conviently turning idiot when asked about the text later."


Heh. Yeah, god and Jesus appearing to him, and an angel giving him 1,400 year old gold plates that he translates by putting a magic rock in his hat.

Much more believable right?
WK: "Joseph Smith asserted that the Book of Mormon peoples were the original inhabitants of the americas"
Will Schryver: "No, he didn’t." 3/19/08
Still waiting for Will to back this up...
_Phaedrus Ut
_Emeritus
Posts: 524
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:55 pm

Re: "700 geographic references straight"

Post by _Phaedrus Ut »

thestyleguy wrote:what 700 geographic references? I thought that nobody has ever been able to remotely pin a place for the setting of the Book of Mormon. If you have 700 georgraphic references and you don't know where you are or what is being described then something is wrong.


I'm still waiting for one.


Phaedrus
_truth dancer
_Emeritus
Posts: 4792
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 12:40 pm

Post by _truth dancer »

"This is the Idiot Savant Joseph. A savant keeping the over 700 geographic references straight while dictating while fabricating, and then conviently turning idiot when asked about the text later."


This sounds like evidence for the Rigdon/Spauling theory.

;-)

~dancer~
"The search for reality is the most dangerous of all undertakings for it destroys the world in which you live." Nisargadatta Maharaj
_SatanWasSetUp
_Emeritus
Posts: 1183
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 2:40 pm

Post by _SatanWasSetUp »

700 geographic references in a 500 page book? That's more than one new reference per page. It seems to me that that's a lot of geographic references.
"We of this Church do not rely on any man-made statement concerning the nature of Deity. Our knowledge comes directly from the personal experience of Joseph Smith." - Gordon B. Hinckley

"It's wrong to criticize leaders of the Mormon Church even if the criticism is true." - Dallin H. Oaks
_karl61
_Emeritus
Posts: 2983
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 6:29 pm

Post by _karl61 »

here is something that led to this response. Maybe I'm not understanding how he is responding to this:

QUOTE
A conscious fabricator could get over ambitious and fail to keep 700 geographic references straight, as evidence by his later confusion about the geographic details. Joseph's confusion and failure is not straightforward evidence that he was a translator.

Christensen responds:

This is the Idiot Savant Joseph. A savant keeping the over 700 geographic references straight while dictating while fabricating, and then conviently turning idiot when asked about the text later.

I personally find Joseph as a translator to be more consistent with the evidence I see.
I want to fly!
_It occurs to me . . .
_Emeritus
Posts: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 6:06 am

Post by _It occurs to me . . . »

Isn't he referring to geographical details, like "there was a river running north and south". I think he's saying that there are 700 of these geographic details that Joseph Smith keeps in his head, without having them come into conflict later on. I don't know if this is true or not, maybe someone should check it out?
_Scottie
_Emeritus
Posts: 4166
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2007 9:54 pm

Post by _Scottie »

Is that just in the Book of Mormon?? There is no way there are 700 geographic references in there.
If there's one thing I've learned from this board, it's that consensual sex with multiple partners is okay unless God commands it. - Abman

I find this place to be hostile toward all brands of stupidity. That's why I like it. - Some Schmo
_karl61
_Emeritus
Posts: 2983
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 6:29 pm

Post by _karl61 »

It occurs to me . . . wrote:Isn't he referring to geographical details, like "there was a river running north and south". I think he's saying that there are 700 of these geographic details that Joseph Smith keeps in his head, without having them come into conflict later on. I don't know if this is true or not, maybe someone should check it out?


I'm not sure that you can check it out unless you know the place that is being desribed.
I want to fly!
_Doctor Steuss
_Emeritus
Posts: 4597
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 6:57 pm

Post by _Doctor Steuss »

Scottie wrote:Is that just in the Book of Mormon?? There is no way there are 700 geographic references in there.

During the confusing back-and-forth wars (i.e. jumping back and forth between the wars that are being fought on different fronts, without letting you know that it's switched gears), there's oodles of 'em.

I don’t think he’s necessarily using “geographic references” as a term to only denote cities, states, etc. I imagine he’s probably using it broadly to include mountains, valleys, rivers, etc.

I think Kevin was probably using a bit of hyperbole. He's a really bright guy in my opinion, and this doesn't sound like an evidence or argument that he would normally brandish.
"Some people never go crazy. What truly horrible lives they must lead." ~Charles Bukowski
Post Reply