Laying to rest another Abraham parallel

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_Trevor
_Emeritus
Posts: 7213
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 6:28 pm

Post by _Trevor »

dartagnan wrote:Hey Brent, do us all a favor would ya?

Stick around!!


Amen. Or was that Amun? Where is Joseph Smith when I need him most?
“I was hooked from the start,” Snoop Dogg said. “We talked about the purpose of life, played Mousetrap, and ate brownies. The kids thought it was off the hook, for real.”
_Brent Metcalfe
_Emeritus
Posts: 201
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 3:37 am

Post by _Brent Metcalfe »

Hi friends,

Thanks for the kind greetings. Unfortunately, playtime is very limited these days. I'll drop in as time permits. (I generally avoid online forums because an environment where inhibitions are minimized often brings out the worst in us.)

I neglected to add an additional note on Coggins7's misstatement. Not only were traditions about Genesis 12:5 referring to Abram's converts readily available in the early 19thC, but so were virtually all of the significant rabbinic parallels to the BoAbr offered by LDS apologists (including Terah's idolatry, the attempted sacrifice of Abram for his refusal to worship false gods, Abram's miraculous deliverance, and so on).

Best regards,

</brent>
_Runtu
_Emeritus
Posts: 16721
Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2006 5:06 am

Post by _Runtu »

Brent Metcalfe wrote:Hi friends,

Thanks for the kind greetings. Unfortunately, playtime is very limited these days. I'll drop in as time permits. (I generally avoid online forums because an environment where inhibitions are minimized often brings out the worst in us.)

I neglected to add an additional note on Coggins7's misstatement. Not only were traditions about Genesis 12:5 referring to Abram's converts readily available in the early 19thC, but so were virtually all of the significant rabbinic parallels to the BoAbr offered by LDS apologists (including Terah's idolatry, the attempted sacrifice of Abram for his refusal to worship false gods, Abram's miraculous deliverance, and so on).

Best regards,

</brent>


Thanks, Brent. It seems like there's not much left for Book of Abraham apologists to cling to, except maybe the catalyst theory.

I'm glad you dropped by. I'm still kicking myself that I never took the time to say anything more than hello to you when we both worked at Novell years ago. Oh, well.
Runtu's Rincón

If you just talk, I find that your mouth comes out with stuff. -- Karl Pilkington
_Sethbag
_Emeritus
Posts: 6855
Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2007 10:52 am

Post by _Sethbag »

Hey Brent, you might want to have a few words with Charity. She's studied the Book of Abraham issue more than most of the critics.


ps: ;-)
Mormonism ceased being a compelling topic for me when I finally came to terms with its transformation from a personality cult into a combination of a real estate company, a SuperPac, and Westboro Baptist Church. - Kishkumen
_Brent Metcalfe
_Emeritus
Posts: 201
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 3:37 am

Post by _Brent Metcalfe »

Hi Runtu and Sethbag,

Thanks for your appreciative and humorous responses.

I think it's telling that Coggins7 (if that is his/her real name) Image has returned, after a brief respite, blathering on with more unbridled poppycock—all the while avoiding this thread like the plague.

Time permitting, tomorrow I'll offer a few comments on Will Schryver's maladroit speculations on the textual history of Abraham 1:12.

Until then ...

Kind regards,

</brent>
Post Reply