Charity, how is LDS right and FLDS, Strangites, RLDS, wrong?

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_the road to hana
_Emeritus
Posts: 1485
Joined: Wed Dec 06, 2006 4:35 pm

Post by _the road to hana »

charity wrote:I understand how people who have not had the same experience cannot understand it. But it is really arrogant for a person to insist that because he/she has not had the experience it doesn't exist.


Who did that?

The point is that if what you perceive to be a confirmation of the Spirit whispers to you that either Joseph Smith was a fraud or the LDS Church is not true, you have no choice but to follow that and act on it.

If Joseph Smith were a fraud, or the LDS Church were not true, would you want to know it?
The road is beautiful, treacherous, and full of twists and turns.
_the road to hana
_Emeritus
Posts: 1485
Joined: Wed Dec 06, 2006 4:35 pm

Post by _the road to hana »

charity wrote:Whoa! Major wrong assumption here. It is a correct statement that I am looking for truths. Line upon line is the way we gain our knowledge. But from a message board? You have got to be joking!


Have you never gleaned truth from a message board? Or tried to advance truth on a message board?
The road is beautiful, treacherous, and full of twists and turns.
_beastie
_Emeritus
Posts: 14216
Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 2:26 am

Post by _beastie »

We can always talk at cross purposes about the witness of the Spirit. But nothing will be gained. Many here say they have never felt such an influence. So we have no common ground to discuss. Others say they thought they did once, but have reevaluted the experience and now put it off as brain chemistry or some other physiological process. But their descriptions, relating their experiences to rock concerts or sappy movies again shows that we have no common ground to discuss this at all.

I understand how people who have not had the same experience cannot understand it. But it is really arrogant for a person to insist that because he/she has not had the experience it doesn't exist.


I've never compared my experience to a sappy movie or rock concert. Others have, I agree, but I don't. Yet I still understand my experience as being something that can be explained without supernatural intervention. Brain studies explain how it works.

Moreover, you don't know what an EV feels during the born-again moment, do you? It could be a thousand times more powerful than what YOU'VE felt. It's arrogant of you to insist that YOUR experience is more powerful than theirs in a way that justifies your insistence that YOU have the real truth.

Or, of course, you could say that Satan causes incredible powerful experiences, anyway.

It's all circular reasoning, charity. You know your experience means what you've decided it means because you know the church is true.
We hate to seem like we don’t trust every nut with a story, but there’s evidence we can point to, and dance while shouting taunting phrases.

Penn & Teller

http://www.mormonmesoamerica.com
_charity
_Emeritus
Posts: 2327
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 3:30 pm

Post by _charity »

beastie wrote:It doesn't make sense for you to use this reasoning if you realize it can be used against you just as easily. From the outside, it makes you believers look nonsensical. You're all telling yourselves that God has told you the REAL truth, and everyone else who thinks God has told him/her the REAL truth is simply misled or deceived. Can you understand, even in a small way, how ridiculous this makes you all look to ousiders?

And the reply to sethbag was a joke. Dang. I wish this board had smilies. I hate the little :) thing. Makes the person look like they're drunk.


Oh. So then your original reply to me was your real reply? I asked God too many times and annoyed him? I should have asked once and then never asked again, and simply lived my life as if it were true, and sooner or later, in his own time, he would have revealed it to me?

Do you realize that this sounds a lot like you just talk yourself into it? And it certainly isn't part of Moroni's promise.

I said in this post, the important thing is to live the truth you know. I think that applies to what I replied to back on another board. Although I am pretty sure it would have been the FAIR message board, and not MA&D.


I agree with that concept. You should live according to your principles, to do otherwise invites misery and self-loathing.


There are all those flat earth people who think those of us who believe in a globe are nonsensical. Do you let them determine your beliefs or actions for fear they might find you less than reasonable? I understand, in more than a small way, that unbelievers and ex-believers ridicule believers. Ridicule and mockery never changes truth. "Outsiders" have often had to change their minds when the real truth became known to them.

I don't recall telling you that God was annoyed with you. I think what you are referencing is something I believe. We ask for answers. We often gets answers we don't understand. And I think we get answers we don't "hear." I am sure what I said was more on the order, that you probably got an answer, but didn't recognize it as such. Or refused to recognize it. That could conceivably cause annoyance.

Remember that old story about the guy caught in a flood. He is up on the roof of his house praying to be saved, and a man in a boat comes by and offers to help him. The guy waves him off, "No, thank you. God will save me.," A helicopter flies over and they try to send a rope ladder down for the guy, but he waves them off. "No thank you, God will save me." The water gets higher and the guy drowns. When he gets to Heaven he is mad at God. "Why didn't you save me?" he demands. God says, "I sent a boat and a helicopter. What more did you want?"

It would have been consistent with what I believe to have said something to you on the order that you were given a witness, but refused to accept it because you wanted something bigger. You got a still small voice and you expected thunder from Heaven.

Here, again, beastie is the problem with discussing something like a spiritual witness with someone who hasn't experienced it. You can say, "maybe you talked yourself into it" because you don't have a basis to understand it. And yes, I know this sounds arrogant. Can't help it. This is just the way it is.

Just so you will know, having had a spiritual witness doesn't make a person better than someone who hasn't had one.
_charity
_Emeritus
Posts: 2327
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 3:30 pm

Post by _charity »

the road to hana wrote:
charity wrote:Whoa! Major wrong assumption here. It is a correct statement that I am looking for truths. Line upon line is the way we gain our knowledge. But from a message board? You have got to be joking!


Have you never gleaned truth from a message board? Or tried to advance truth on a message board?


I try to advance truth on this message board. But I don't think there has been any advance.

Not all message boards are created equal, of course. I do learn from an individual poster here and there. More there than here.
_beastie
_Emeritus
Posts: 14216
Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 2:26 am

Post by _beastie »

It would have been consistent with what I believe to have said something to you on the order that you were given a witness, but refused to accept it because you wanted something bigger. You got a still small voice and you expected thunder from Heaven.

Here, again, beastie is the problem with discussing something like a spiritual witness with someone who hasn't experienced it. You can say, "maybe you talked yourself into it" because you don't have a basis to understand it. And yes, I know this sounds arrogant. Can't help it. This is just the way it is.


How arrogant of you to assume that I hadn't experienced what you are talking about. I had an incredibly powerful experience, and I knew from years of listening to others talking about their testimonies that most members' experiences were more on the line of the still small voice.

And you're still being inconsistent. On one hand, you claim that those who compare their experiences to what they feel during a powerful movie or rock concert obviously aren't talking about what you're talking about. But then you turn around and tell me that I may have had the "small still voice" instead of thunder.

So which is it, Charity? Do experiences that could be more equated to the "small still voice" still count, or does it have to be thunder?

Why don't you just be honest and admit that no matter what an exmormon says, you won't believe they ever felt what you feel? You are a product of church teachings. No matter how you try to cloak it to be more PC, in the end, you still believe that people leave the church because they were proud, sinful, lazy, or never really had a testimony to begin with.
We hate to seem like we don’t trust every nut with a story, but there’s evidence we can point to, and dance while shouting taunting phrases.

Penn & Teller

http://www.mormonmesoamerica.com
_beastie
_Emeritus
Posts: 14216
Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 2:26 am

Post by _beastie »

One more comment about my own experiences - when I was praying to God to let me know that Joseph Smith was a true prophet, or that the church was the one true church, I didn't really feel NOTHING. I felt confused, anxious, worried, and frightened.

I always wondered what a "stupor of thought" meant. I finally found out.
We hate to seem like we don’t trust every nut with a story, but there’s evidence we can point to, and dance while shouting taunting phrases.

Penn & Teller

http://www.mormonmesoamerica.com
_charity
_Emeritus
Posts: 2327
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 3:30 pm

Post by _charity »

beastie wrote:
I've never compared my experience to a sappy movie or rock concert. Others have, I agree, but I don't. Yet I still understand my experience as being something that can be explained without supernatural intervention. Brain studies explain how it works.

Moreover, you don't know what an EV feels during the born-again moment, do you? It could be a thousand times more powerful than what YOU'VE felt. It's arrogant of you to insist that YOUR experience is more powerful than theirs in a way that justifies your insistence that YOU have the real truth.

Or, of course, you could say that Satan causes incredible powerful experiences, anyway.

It's all circular reasoning, charity. You know your experience means what you've decided it means because you know the church is true.


You can explain a lot of things without supernatural intervention. And brain studies explain a lot. Except they still can't explain awareness. But psychologists just pretend they can and go from there.

I am not comparing my experience to EV's. I have said many times that God loves all His children, and gives them the witness to the truth that will help them in their progress toward returning home. I have said repeatedly I don't think the Holy Ghost is limited to acting within the membership of the Church.

I have absolute confidence that God is acting in the best interest of every single person who has ever or will ever live on this earth. I will be held accountable for the light and truth I have received. You will be held accountable for the light and truth you receive. Ditto everyone.
_the road to hana
_Emeritus
Posts: 1485
Joined: Wed Dec 06, 2006 4:35 pm

Post by _the road to hana »

charity wrote:
the road to hana wrote:
charity wrote:Whoa! Major wrong assumption here. It is a correct statement that I am looking for truths. Line upon line is the way we gain our knowledge. But from a message board? You have got to be joking!


Have you never gleaned truth from a message board? Or tried to advance truth on a message board?


I try to advance truth on this message board. But I don't think there has been any advance.

Not all message boards are created equal, of course. I do learn from an individual poster here and there. More there than here.


So if you believe truth can be advanced or found on a message board, why would you think anyone would be joking about finding it?

What particular "truths" are you advancing?
The road is beautiful, treacherous, and full of twists and turns.
_Mercury
_Emeritus
Posts: 5545
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 2:14 pm

Post by _Mercury »

charity wrote:
the road to hana wrote:
charity wrote:Whoa! Major wrong assumption here. It is a correct statement that I am looking for truths. Line upon line is the way we gain our knowledge. But from a message board? You have got to be joking!


Have you never gleaned truth from a message board? Or tried to advance truth on a message board?


I try to advance truth on this message board. But I don't think there has been any advance.

Not all message boards are created equal, of course. I do learn from an individual poster here and there. More there than here.


Charity, as one who is familiar with the academic process I am skeptical of your claim that you are trying to advance truth. Truth stands on the basis of its evidence. Could it be that you are unclear on the concept of evidence and thus have false ideas on what makes something true?

I suspect you bifurcate the "truth" of Mormonism with Truth that actually delivers.
Last edited by FAST Enterprise [Crawler] on Sun Nov 11, 2007 4:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.
And crawling on the planet's face
Some insects called the human race
Lost in time
And lost in space...and meaning
Post Reply