charity wrote:the road to hana wrote:Charity, you are still entirely missing the point about the word "union" as it relates to "one flesh."
I don't miss your point. I just don't agree with it. I think you are mistaken about "one flesh." I think it is possible for a man to have more than one committed relationship, concurrent, of course. If and only if the Lord commands it.
But I understand perfectly what you are sayiing.
1.
"I think it is possible for a man to have more than one committed relationship"
I would like Charity as 59th wife of ANY early GA. "If and only if the Lord commands it." Oh, Lord, please command it her!
2.
Please, draw the relationships.
Draw a circle with an "M" in it , for the male persons handled.
Draw a circle with an "F" in it , for the female persons handled.
Draw a line between the "F" and "M" circles, for any "committed relationship".
If there is one "F" or one "M" with more than one line (relationship), then there is polygamy or polygyny.
This is true, even one call the "relationships" commandment, eternal, celestial etc.
3.
"But I understand perfectly what you are sayiing"
No, You don't.
- Whenever a poet or preacher, chief or wizard spouts gibberish, the human race spends centuries deciphering the message. - Umberto Eco
- To assert that the earth revolves around the sun is as erroneous as to claim that Jesus was not born of a virgin. - Cardinal Bellarmine at the trial of Galilei