Patriarchal blessings...Tribal confusion.

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_charity
_Emeritus
Posts: 2327
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 3:30 pm

Post by _charity »

Maxrep wrote:Though this could never be proven, I'd be willing to bet the farm, that if the children all received their blessings from the same patriarch, well...I don't even have to finish the thought. We all get it, whether or not an admission is made.


So to finish your thought ". . . all of them would be from the same tribe."

I know of three patriarchs for which that was not true. I can't speak for all of them.
_Dakotah
_Emeritus
Posts: 43
Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2007 5:36 am

Post by _Dakotah »

So if the family is Pima or Hunkpapa Sioux and nowhere in the records or memory of anyone was there ever any intermixing with other tribes or colors, can the four kids come from different 'lines' in the blessings?
_truth dancer
_Emeritus
Posts: 4792
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 12:40 pm

Post by _truth dancer »

Hi Dakotah...

So if the family is Pima or Hunkpapa Sioux and nowhere in the records or memory of anyone was there ever any intermixing with other tribes or colors, can the four kids come from different 'lines' in the blessings?


I'm not sure your position toward the church... if you are a believer or not, so I'll give you two opinions! :-)

If you are a believer then you may go with the idea that somewhere along the line, two thousand years ago, some Lamanite had a relationship with a Mayan, hence you have Lehi's blood and it could be from any tribe. Or, you could go with the adoption idea, meaning regardless of your blood or DNA, you can spiritually be adoped into whatever tribe the Patriarch decides.

I know of a situation where a young man received his PB and was from the lineage of Benjamin. His LDS ancestors go way back to the beginning of the church, and there is no one known in his family from this particular tribe... so they seem to think it was not about blood or DNA but something in the pre-mortal life.

If you are not a believer, then you may want to just go with the idea that the LDS church has created the experience of a PB which is similar to a psychic telling someone of a past life and possible future events.

I hope that helps... :-)

~dancer~

Edit for clarity
Last edited by Bing [Bot] on Mon Nov 19, 2007 1:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"The search for reality is the most dangerous of all undertakings for it destroys the world in which you live." Nisargadatta Maharaj
_charity
_Emeritus
Posts: 2327
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 3:30 pm

Post by _charity »

Dakotah wrote:So if the family is Pima or Hunkpapa Sioux and nowhere in the records or memory of anyone was there ever any intermixing with other tribes or colors, can the four kids come from different 'lines' in the blessings?


How far back does the memory go? Can you name all 16 of your great-great-grandparents? That is only about 130 years. Do these Pima or Sioux have recorded genealogies for over 1500 years? (That is back to the end of the Nephite history.)
_charity
_Emeritus
Posts: 2327
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 3:30 pm

Post by _charity »

truth dancer wrote:
I know of a situation where a young man received his PB and was from the lineage of Benjamin. His ancestors go way back and there is no one known in his family from this particular tribe... so they seem to think it was not about blood or DNA but something in the pre-mortal life.
~dancer~


Every body's ancestors go way back, dancer. There is no way a family could know they were not descended from Benjamin. Like I told Dakotah, there is a lot of genealogy. No genealogy that goes back to 70 a.d. is proven on all descending lines. And what is there includes lots of conjecture.
_ludwigm
_Emeritus
Posts: 10158
Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2007 8:07 am

Post by _ludwigm »

truth dancer wrote:
But I don't know why. You will have to ask him.
Don't care... don't think God cares.
I think the better question would be not "does it impact one's behavior in any way?" but shouldn't it?
...
Really Charity? In what way? Why is it important for anyone to "know" what tribe they are from, in this life or in the next. (Looking for something more than opinion here.... any real reason)? I'm pretty sure that in reality DNA would not be traced from everyone on the planet to one of the twelve tribes, and we hear of folks being adopted into the lineage of Abraham, which would mean there is no particular DNA at all.

It seems completely worthless information....
~dancer~

Blessing ... baptizing ... washing ... anointing ... endowments ... special robes (even undies) ... cut a little from the d!ck (pardon, this is another company - the ancestors ... marks ... tokens ...
Most of them are sacred - if one find paradoxes, it's forbidden to talk about.
Don't ask "Really Charity?" ! For many people these are real things.
- Whenever a poet or preacher, chief or wizard spouts gibberish, the human race spends centuries deciphering the message. - Umberto Eco
- To assert that the earth revolves around the sun is as erroneous as to claim that Jesus was not born of a virgin. - Cardinal Bellarmine at the trial of Galilei
_Maxrep
_Emeritus
Posts: 677
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 4:29 am

Post by _Maxrep »

charity wrote:
Maxrep wrote:Though this could never be proven, I'd be willing to bet the farm, that if the children all received their blessings from the same patriarch, well...I don't even have to finish the thought. We all get it, whether or not an admission is made.


So to finish your thought ". . . all of them would be from the same tribe."

I know of three patriarchs for which that was not true. I can't speak for all of them.


Yes, you can easily finish my thought, just as any active church member could. In a private setting, if a member was asked to play out the scenario I had described, I believe they would come to the same conclusion as I have. For this to work, an honest response would require privacy.

I'm not interested in what response you would give on this message board, Charity. You already sidestepped the hypothetical question. I have no problem answering any question you ask with complete candor. I already acknowledged that DNA direct lineage may not even be a requirement for tribal declaration. Even here though, you can't give an inch - when a foot would be appropriate.
I don't expect to see same-sex marriage in Utah within my lifetime. - Scott Lloyd, Oct 23 2013
_truth dancer
_Emeritus
Posts: 4792
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 12:40 pm

Post by _truth dancer »

Every body's ancestors go way back, dancer. There is no way a family could know they were not descended from Benjamin. Like I told Dakotah, there is a lot of genealogy. No genealogy that goes back to 70 a.d. is proven on all descending lines. And what is there includes lots of conjecture.


Hi Charity...

I edited my post for clarity... I was meaning LDS ancestry. I understand everyone's ancestors go way back! (smile).

My point was, to this family, because there was no known LDS ancestors from the tribe of Benjamin, they believe the tribe reference goes back to something in the pre-moral life.

I'm not agreeing... I do not think it is anything but a made up something-or-other.

But, this BELIEVING family firmy believes this.

In other words, it is a way for believers to make sense of this whole lineage thing.

Just trying to help! :-)

~dancer~
"The search for reality is the most dangerous of all undertakings for it destroys the world in which you live." Nisargadatta Maharaj
_charity
_Emeritus
Posts: 2327
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 3:30 pm

Re: Patriarchal blessings...Tribal confusion.

Post by _charity »

Maxrep wrote:The following story I related a couple years ago on FAIR. This account is interesting to me from a couple of perspectives. First, the circumstances of the this families events are unlikely enough that it almost seems that the whole story was fabricated with the sole purpose in mind of laying a snare against patriarchs. Second, the chain of events offer a view into the reliability of tribal lineage declarations in patriarchal blessings, that may seldom be seen.

Obtaining a patriarchal blessing was an event that I looked forward to. I believed my stake patriarch was inspired. I fasted and prayed in conjunction with receiving my blessing. Many here have shared this experience as a youth.

At this point in time, I have realized that many declarations within these blessings strain at any measure of reasonable belief. There have been many accounts of blessings declaring that the recipient would be alive to witness the second coming. These folks have been good and dead for decades. Many women have been told that they look like their Heavenly Mother. Perhaps this statement is a well intentioned way of helping girls cherish their blessing.

A Polynesian family of 6 in my ward, had all received their patriarchal blessings. The children's blessings each came from different patriarchs. This occurred as the family had moved within different stakes several times during the fathers military career. Three of the children were pronounced by three unique patriarchs, to be from three separate tribes completely unique from one another and their parents.

Do you think if the children had all gone to the same patriarch, that they would have been declared the same lineage or three unique tribes? Is it possible that these patriarchs had not given blessings to Polynesian children before and were giving the lineage of these teens their best guess?
All of the kids resembled their parents - Polynesian. It was not as if one child was a redhead, the other with Scandinavian features, and so on. From outward appearances, their family ancestral tree did not look to be the proverbial melting pot!

I'm hoping Charity may chime in here. Is the declared lineage the "Principal" tribe, or can it simply be "Among" one of the twelve tribes? Another item for thought is the odds that would have to be overcome to realize a situation where three siblings, from a Polynesian background, could each carry different dominant DNA to firmly plant them within three unique tribal classifications.

Patriarchal blessings have had their share of less than inspiring outcomes. Have Patriarchs been counseled to tone down blessings and avoid dramatic or fantastic declarations in the past few years?


I don't know why you would ask me for my opinion, then say you will disregard it.

I have highlighted the questions you asked in your OP and will deal with them one at a time.


Do you think if the children had all gone to the same patriarch, that they would have been declared the same lineage or three unique tribes?


I think they would have been declared to be of three different tribes. The declaration of lineage is not dependent on the patriarch. I do not accept the presumptions in the question that the patriarch simply make up the blessings. I believe, of course, that the blessings are inspired by God. I said in a post that I have known of instances where the same patriarch has delcared different lineages for children in the same family, the family well known to the patriarch.

Is it possible that these patriarchs had not given blessings to Polynesian children before and were giving the lineage of these teens their best guess?

No, I don't believe that to be true. Any patriarch is a mature individual in the Church. He has had many different callings in the Church, and would be expected to be knowledgeable. As such, he would probably have some acquaintance with the idea (not doctrinal but nevertheless popular) that the Polynesians are descendants of Lehi, through Hagoth and his people who left in ships and were never heard of again. That means, that if he were just using his own best guess, a patriarch would declare the lineage to be of Manasseh. Any declaration of lineage other than this should be evidence to you that the patriarch is not just guessing.

Have Patriarchs been counseled to tone down blessings and avoid dramatic or fantastic declarations in the past few years.

I asked my friend who is a patriarch. There is a handbook given to patriarchs. They are told to go by the guidance of the Spirit. He has not been told to "tone" down.

Now are your questions answered? I haven't sidestepped anything.

P.S. The patriarchal blessing is not just for this life. Anyone who is told they will witness the Second Coming, still will. Just from the other side.
_harmony
_Emeritus
Posts: 18195
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am

Post by _harmony »

I was always under the impression the lineage wasn't literal, but was spiritual. I could be wrong, though.
Post Reply