Elder Holland: "Jesus Christ shaved off his beard."

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_The Nehor
_Emeritus
Posts: 11832
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2007 2:05 am

Post by _The Nehor »

harmony wrote:
The Nehor wrote:No, I meant they've said they've seen him and one described his reaction to such an encounter. None shared any details though about what he or they said, just that it happened.


This is downright impossible. That Christ would appear to a handful of men, mention nothing about the state of his siblings, give no instruction about fixing the state of his siblings, and then disappear again is unthinkable.

Nope. What you propose is impossible.

[edited to add] And we know nothing was said about Christ's siblings because nothing has changed in the way the church deals with the poor, the widowed, the downtrodden. Had something changed, I'd believe this anecdote. Since it didn't, I don't. By their fruits. And our LDS leaders have no fruits worth mentioning.


That's assuming Christ didn't come to share something about the Apostle in question with the Apostle. It's always about the whole Church isn't it?
"Surely he knows that DCP, The Nehor, Lamanite, and other key apologists..." -Scratch clarifying my status in apologetics
"I admit it; I'm a petty, petty man." -Some Schmo
_Mister Scratch
_Emeritus
Posts: 5604
Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 8:13 pm

Post by _Mister Scratch »

The Nehor wrote:
harmony wrote:
The Nehor wrote:No, I meant they've said they've seen him and one described his reaction to such an encounter. None shared any details though about what he or they said, just that it happened.


This is downright impossible. That Christ would appear to a handful of men, mention nothing about the state of his siblings, give no instruction about fixing the state of his siblings, and then disappear again is unthinkable.

Nope. What you propose is impossible.

[edited to add] And we know nothing was said about Christ's siblings because nothing has changed in the way the church deals with the poor, the widowed, the downtrodden. Had something changed, I'd believe this anecdote. Since it didn't, I don't. By their fruits. And our LDS leaders have no fruits worth mentioning.


That's assuming Christ didn't come to share something about the Apostle in question with the Apostle. It's always about the whole Church isn't it?


Well, the Savior appears so seldom... You would think He'd do it for bit-time reasons, rather than simply giving one of the Apostles a pep talk, or whatever.
_The Nehor
_Emeritus
Posts: 11832
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2007 2:05 am

Post by _The Nehor »

Mister Scratch wrote:Well, the Savior appears so seldom... You would think He'd do it for bit-time reasons, rather than simply giving one of the Apostles a pep talk, or whatever.


That assumes that he only appears seldomly.
"Surely he knows that DCP, The Nehor, Lamanite, and other key apologists..." -Scratch clarifying my status in apologetics
"I admit it; I'm a petty, petty man." -Some Schmo
_Mister Scratch
_Emeritus
Posts: 5604
Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 8:13 pm

Post by _Mister Scratch »

The Nehor wrote:
Mister Scratch wrote:Well, the Savior appears so seldom... You would think He'd do it for bit-time reasons, rather than simply giving one of the Apostles a pep talk, or whatever.


That assumes that he only appears seldomly.


There is no evidence to indicate otherwise.
_Scottie
_Emeritus
Posts: 4166
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2007 9:54 pm

Post by _Scottie »

Mister Scratch wrote:
Bond...James Bond wrote:Maybe Jesus shaved his head to cover for the hereditary baldness that ran through his family.


I guess this also settles the long-held question about whether the contemporary Brethren have actually seen Christ or not. At minimum, I guess Elder Holland has.

Not necessarily. Notice how he phrased it. "The last time I saw him, he didn't." Well, if the last time he saw him was never, this could still be a true statement.
If there's one thing I've learned from this board, it's that consensual sex with multiple partners is okay unless God commands it. - Abman

I find this place to be hostile toward all brands of stupidity. That's why I like it. - Some Schmo
_Mister Scratch
_Emeritus
Posts: 5604
Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 8:13 pm

Post by _Mister Scratch »

Scottie wrote:
Mister Scratch wrote:
Bond...James Bond wrote:Maybe Jesus shaved his head to cover for the hereditary baldness that ran through his family.


I guess this also settles the long-held question about whether the contemporary Brethren have actually seen Christ or not. At minimum, I guess Elder Holland has.

Not necessarily. Notice how he phrased it. "The last time I saw him, he didn't." Well, if the last time he saw him was never, this could still be a true statement.


Lol... Um, no. His statement clearly contained information suggestion an actual visitation (i.e., the detail's of Christ's appearance). Then again, it seems pretty clear that Holland was lying, so I guess this is a moot point.
_The Nehor
_Emeritus
Posts: 11832
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2007 2:05 am

Post by _The Nehor »

Mister Scratch wrote:
The Nehor wrote:
Mister Scratch wrote:Well, the Savior appears so seldom... You would think He'd do it for bit-time reasons, rather than simply giving one of the Apostles a pep talk, or whatever.


That assumes that he only appears seldomly.


There is no evidence to indicate otherwise.


Oh there's plenty but it requires living the gospel and living among the spiritually powerful so you know those who have. They don't run to the Deseret News when it happens.
"Surely he knows that DCP, The Nehor, Lamanite, and other key apologists..." -Scratch clarifying my status in apologetics
"I admit it; I'm a petty, petty man." -Some Schmo
_Gadianton
_Emeritus
Posts: 9947
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2007 5:12 am

Post by _Gadianton »

The Nehor wrote:
Mister Scratch wrote:
The Nehor wrote:
Mister Scratch wrote:Well, the Savior appears so seldom... You would think He'd do it for bit-time reasons, rather than simply giving one of the Apostles a pep talk, or whatever.


That assumes that he only appears seldomly.


There is no evidence to indicate otherwise.


Oh there's plenty but it requires living the gospel and living among the spiritually powerful so you know those who have. They don't run to the Deseret News when it happens.


It also requires either a predisposition toward mental health problems or anti-social behavior, pathological lying etc..
Lou Midgley 08/20/2020: "...meat wad," and "cockroach" are pithy descriptions of human beings used by gemli? They were not fashioned by Professor Peterson.

LM 11/23/2018: one can explain away the soul of human beings...as...a Meat Unit, to use Professor Peterson's clever derogatory description of gemli's ideology.
_Ray A

Post by _Ray A »

Inconceivable wrote:
I'll defer to your recollections. I bought it all when a missionary.

When I got there in '82, the mission had already changed from a 4 hour (BD) conversion to a 7 day conversion schedule. It didn't work at all either. The BD experiment was also done in Victoria.


You served your mission in Sydney? Did you ever get to the South Coast?

Inconceivable wrote:sorry everyone for the off topic bantor.


Ditto.
_LifeOnaPlate
_Emeritus
Posts: 2799
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2007 4:50 pm

Post by _LifeOnaPlate »

Gadianton wrote:
It also requires either a predisposition toward mental health problems or anti-social behavior, pathological lying etc..


Nyuck, nyuck, nycuk!
One moment in annihilation's waste,
one moment, of the well of life to taste-
The stars are setting and the caravan
starts for the dawn of nothing; Oh, make haste!

-Omar Khayaam

*Be on the lookout for the forthcoming album from Jiminy Finn and the Moneydiggers.*
Post Reply