I thought it deserved its own thread.
Compton writes,
Bold mine.I believe that all truth is faith-promoting, if we're talking about authentic faith. No authentic truth damages authentic faith. Truth, even difficult truths, will only deepen and give breadth of vision to authentic faith. Only brittle, oversimplified faith will break easily when confronted with difficult truths. When we face difficult truths, we should not sensationalize them, but we should deal with them straightforwardly and honestly, using historical context and sympathetic insight to put them into perspective. Sometimes, when we have had oversimplified faith, we will need to deepen and broaden our faith to include tragedy and contradiction and human limitation, but that is not a matter of giving up our faith -- it is a matter of developing our faith. I realize that this can be a painful process at times, but it is a process that gives our faith more solidity and more breadth. The eye of faith sees greater depth, perspectives, and gradations of color; the heart of faith responds more to the tragedies of our bygone brothers and sisters, who become more real and more sympathetic to us.
I believe that the gospel includes all truth, and all truth is part of the gospel.
I believe that the gospel is afraid of no truth. All truths, both the brightness of love and the shadows of tragedy, contribute to the infinite beauty of the gospel.
The gospel includes heights and depths. It includes shining, dazzling light, and darkest shadow -- and everything in between, all shades of gray. It includes knowledge of God, but it also includes knowledge of Satan. It includes knowledge of great and good men and women, and of deeply flawed men and women. It also includes men and women who have great goodness and serious flaws at the same time -- sometimes, seemingly, on alternate days. It includes aspects of reality that are supposedly "secular" -- science, economics, music, history. (See D&C 93:53.)
Does the gospel include lies? Does it include untruths? Does it include cruelty? Does it include harming others? Does it include prophets thinking they are inspired when they are not? Does it include putting another's "truth" over one's own?
What is "difficult truth"? Is it admitting that Joseph Smith did horrible things? Or does it mean ultimate truth can be horrible (CKHL is really hell)?
I would LOVE for someone to explain to me why it is good to have faith in something that seems horrible, cruel, wrong, unholy, and totally unbelievable and at odds with reality.
Why is it a good idea to try to believe something, or have faith in a belief system, that is filled with untruths? Whose leaders apparently have no idea what is truth? Or a belief that requires faith in something that goes completely contrary to what seems good and holy.
The whole, "shift your paradigm so you can believe" idea does not seems a good way to live whether we are discussing the LDS church, Scientology, FLDS, Islam, or anything other belief system.
Maybe it is better, when one's reality doesn't match a particular faith tradtion, to listen to one's heart, life authentically, and go with what seems right, makes sense, and feels right/holy/good.
~dancer~