Jesus did sin. Very much so. This is why there is very little of his childhood in the scriptures. If you think how and why the Bible was put together you will see what I mean. I believe Jesus was even involved in homosexual acts.
I believe you are mentally deranged. There are homes for people of this kind...
Why thank you coggins, I do not know you myself so I cannot say the same to you but may I ask, what makes you come to that conclusion? Is it because I have offendended you by saying Jesus was a battyboi? I only read books. Out the author in one of your special homes.
I was just looking for the bit about Jesus being in a young boys bed whom loved him very much. I came across this. XD ; I am androgynous. [I am Mother (and) I am] Father since [I copulate] with my-self ..... You know I would have less of a problem believing things if men weren't such narcicists. Why is it that they have to make out Man is the important bit and the women are the silent part. Such asswipes.
I cannot seem to find the exact one i am looking for but I have found this:
In summary, a womans brother had died and she cam to Jesus for help, this disciples shouted at her and Jesus was not happy with this and so took the woman to the tomb and opened it and her brother was alive. Her brother looked at Jesus intently and loved him and thanked him and asked that he stay with him and so Jesus did for he was a wealthy man. After 6 days Jesus gave the man a command and in that evening the man came to jesuswearing a linen cloth over his naked body and stayed with him that night "for Jesus was teaching him the mystery of the kingdom of God" and when he got up he returned to the other side of the Jordan. The letter goes on but it is a little confusing and bits are missing something about a passage that is not in the secret gospel but it talks about Naked man with Naked man but it says follow Mark 10:46a It must be Mark in the New Testament because there isn't a book of Mark in this book.
God makes the rules. If you break God's rules that is a sin
When the pharisees were ready to stone, Jesus knew full well the rule he himself made in the Old Testament required the execution and the pharisees were right on target. Jesus amended the rule on the spot, he did not overturn the woman's judgement and justice still demanded her execution. However, by saying "Let he without sin cast the first stone," while the woman yet remained guilty as charged and under a standing imperative for her execution, the Godly outcome was delayed as all of a sudden, no one was qualified to carry out the punishment. Had one of those pharisees been without sin, it would have been his duty to cast the first stone.
But what about Jesus?
The fact that Jesus did not carry out the punishment either implies 1) he was himself also a sinner, and not qualified to cast the first stone, 2) at that moment, Jesus became a sinner as he had now violated his own law by not casting the stone.
Either way, Jesus was a sinner.
He was a blemished lamb, and his death won't redeem Gaz, Charity, Cog, or anyone else. You'll all be in hell with me and the rest of MDB.
No, it could just mean that Jesus made a choice not to stone her.
"Surely he knows that DCP, The Nehor, Lamanite, and other key apologists..." -Scratch clarifying my status in apologetics "I admit it; I'm a petty, petty man." -Some Schmo
God makes the rules. If you break God's rules that is a sin
When the pharisees were ready to stone, Jesus knew full well the rule he himself made in the Old Testament required the execution and the pharisees were right on target. Jesus amended the rule on the spot, he did not overturn the woman's judgement and justice still demanded her execution. However, by saying "Let he without sin cast the first stone," while the woman yet remained guilty as charged and under a standing imperative for her execution, the Godly outcome was delayed as all of a sudden, no one was qualified to carry out the punishment. Had one of those pharisees been without sin, it would have been his duty to cast the first stone.
But what about Jesus?
The fact that Jesus did not carry out the punishment either implies 1) he was himself also a sinner, and not qualified to cast the first stone, 2) at that moment, Jesus became a sinner as he had now violated his own law by not casting the stone.
Either way, Jesus was a sinner.
He was a blemished lamb, and his death won't redeem Gaz, Charity, Cog, or anyone else. You'll all be in hell with me and the rest of MDB.
No, it could just mean that Jesus made a choice not to stone her.
When I was Mormon, I made the choice not to do my home teaching. I guess that wasn't a sin.
Lou Midgley 08/20/2020: "...meat wad," and "cockroach" are pithy descriptions of human beings used by gemli? They were not fashioned by Professor Peterson.
LM 11/23/2018: one can explain away the soul of human beings...as...a Meat Unit, to use Professor Peterson's clever derogatory description of gemli's ideology.
Gadianton wrote:When I was Mormon, I made the choice not to do my home teaching. I guess that wasn't a sin.
Is not doing Home Teaching a sin?
It's not fulfilling your calling, but I don't know that I would label it as a sin.
;)
The book of Leviticus is clear in its instructions, and when the children of Israel failed to carry out the ends of God's laws, they were punished for it. Disobedience is disobedience, whether it is a sin of commision, or ommission.
Lou Midgley 08/20/2020: "...meat wad," and "cockroach" are pithy descriptions of human beings used by gemli? They were not fashioned by Professor Peterson.
LM 11/23/2018: one can explain away the soul of human beings...as...a Meat Unit, to use Professor Peterson's clever derogatory description of gemli's ideology.
Gadianton wrote:The book of Leviticus is clear in its instructions, and when the children of Israel failed to carry out the ends of God's laws, they were punished for it. Disobedience is disobedience, whether it is a sin of commision, or ommission.
Those blasted sins of omission. I was guilty of all of those.
Hi Guy, intriguing question because there is no definitive answer. So, i'll speculate along with you who "knows" no more about "Jesus sinning" than the preceeding or following Posters, whom ever they might be...
Here's Mee... since Jesus is legendary, what we have in print concerning him cannot ALL be taken literally. Assuming his actuality, which i do, there is little doubt in my mind that he made mistakes. Learned from mistakes and became better for it. Seems universal to me. The same path of all humans...
IMSCO, to believe the "Perfect-man" myth, sells Jesus short, and displaces his down-to-earth teachings to the masses with improbable adventures and impossible dreams. How i speculate... Warm regards, Roger