Adam/Eve shown the Garden Exit Door

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_Jason Bourne
_Emeritus
Posts: 9207
Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 8:00 pm

Post by _Jason Bourne »

Jersey Girl wrote:Doesn't anyone see the flaw in the LDS reasoning? charity is correct that they were in a garden where everything grew on it's own yet she misses the salient point which I will now address and that is that Adam and Eve were begining to develop their own occupation as fruit pickers and then what, hurled out of the garden due to unemployment?




What is the flaw? Why is it a flaw?
_Jason Bourne
_Emeritus
Posts: 9207
Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 8:00 pm

Post by _Jason Bourne »

Jersey Girl wrote:pirate
I was joking. Maybe their currency was the fruit of the tree of life afterall it was very precious.

I will get back to you tomorow on what I think. I think much of my idea's stem from my mum and things from her studies. But it might be legnthy and so I would like to reply in a logical order.


You may have been joking, pirate, but charity specifically pinpointed unemployment as a reason for their banishment from the garden. Logical order would be great.

I seek clarity.


If charity thinks it was just so they could work she is not correct. I know of no LDS teaching as such. It was for sin that they were cast out. Sure LDS believe that had they remained in there that mankind would not exist and that the fall took place so man could be and have opposition etc. So what? They did not fall just so they could work.
_ozemc
_Emeritus
Posts: 397
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 3:21 pm

Post by _ozemc »

Jason Bourne wrote:
Jersey Girl wrote:pirate
I was joking. Maybe their currency was the fruit of the tree of life afterall it was very precious.

I will get back to you tomorow on what I think. I think much of my idea's stem from my mum and things from her studies. But it might be legnthy and so I would like to reply in a logical order.


You may have been joking, pirate, but charity specifically pinpointed unemployment as a reason for their banishment from the garden. Logical order would be great.

I seek clarity.


If charity thinks it was just so they could work she is not correct. I know of no LDS teaching as such. It was for sin that they were cast out. Sure LDS believe that had they remained in there that mankind would not exist and that the fall took place so man could be and have opposition etc. So what? They did not fall just so they could work.


of course, that fact that mankind did exist for thousands of years before this all supposedly took place kind of negates that whole argument, doesn't it?
"What does God need with a starship?" - Captain James T. Kirk

Most people would like to be delivered from temptation but would like it to keep in touch. - Robert Orben
_msnobody
_Emeritus
Posts: 912
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 4:28 am

Re: Adam/Eve shown the Garden Exit Door

Post by _msnobody »

When I was an active, believing Mormon, my belief was nothing more than what the church itself taught me: That with their quasi-glorified bodies, they weren't able to have children, thus a "fall" was required to start the human race. As the old LDS couplet goes, "Adam fell, but he fell forward."

Maybe he fell out the garden door. :-P
_msnobody
_Emeritus
Posts: 912
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 4:28 am

Post by _msnobody »

charity wrote:Being cast out happened after the fall. So the question isn't about if the fall was necessary or not. That has all been settled.

They were cast out for their own good. People should work for their living. They would not have learned much in the Garden where everything just grew on its own.

Adam was placed in the garden to work it and take care of it.
_msnobody
_Emeritus
Posts: 912
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 4:28 am

Post by _msnobody »

2 Nephi chp.2
22 And now, behold, if Adam had not transgressed he would not have fallen, but he would have remained in the garden of Eden. And all things which were created must have remained in the same state in which they were after they were created; and they must have remained forever, and had no end.
23 And they would have had no children; wherefore they would have remained in a state of innocence, having no joy, for they knew no misery; doing no good, for they knew no sin.


What this says to me when I read it is that if Adam had not disobeyed God's command:
1. He would have lived forever.
2. Lived that forever in the garden.
3. Lived in the same state in which they were created (If I recall correctly, God said it was very good by the way)
4. Lived forever knowing no sin.
5. Would have had no children.
6. Continued forever in a state of innocence.
7. Never would have known joy.
8. Never known misery.
9. Never done good.
10. Would have never known sin.

This tells me also that the marriage bed would be impure or In other words, sex inside the context of marriage is sin.
_MishMagnet
_Emeritus
Posts: 288
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 2:04 pm

Post by _MishMagnet »

I don't believe it did happen. Creation myths are not hard to come by. Why is ours correct and nobody else's is correct? Oh right, because it's ours.
Insert ironic quote from fellow board member here.
_Gazelam
_Emeritus
Posts: 5659
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 2:06 am

Post by _Gazelam »

Why is ours correct and nobody else's is correct? Oh right, because it's ours.


Very good. Your coming along nicely.
We can easily forgive a child who is afraid of the dark; the real tragedy of life is when men are afraid of the light. - Plato
Post Reply