ludwigm wrote:It should be my weakness in english but I don't understand at all this obsession about real names.
Let me try to help you out here, Ludwig. ... Some would say that the LDS Church is the last organization to have the moral right to expect straight dealing from others.
All I remember is the possibility that they were monitoring their members on the Internet...........when did that change to accepted fact? Evidence?
One member of my home country, once asked me : "Are You that Ludwig I have seen on the XXX mailing list? - - (Ludwig is my real nickname, known by all my acquaintances) Then I have asked back : "Well. Are You lurking or attending on that list? Yes, I am that Ludwig." Is it an evidence?
Please don't forget my opinion in the very same comment:
ludwigm wrote:Beside this, I can imagine one may have motivations to remain anonym. In that cases, it makes no sense to poke around.
The Nehor wrote:All I remember is the possibility that they were monitoring their members on the Internet...........when did that change to accepted fact? Evidence?
Well, Nehor old buddy (sorry to thus insult you), some months ago there was an entry at BYU's Marriott School blog that let the cat out of the bag on that one. It claimed that the Church monitors over 6000 "unfriendly" websites per month. So, I think there is little question about this being merely a "possibility."
“I was hooked from the start,” Snoop Dogg said. “We talked about the purpose of life, played Mousetrap, and ate brownies. The kids thought it was off the hook, for real.”