Another brain-dead individual posting on MAD about sex

Post by **_TAK** » Sun Dec 02, 2007 5:50 pm

Three years out of High School?? Why isn't this dork on a mission??

Post by **_Zoidberg** » Sun Dec 02, 2007 5:52 pm

MishMagnet wrote:Okay. I went and read the comments.

I really liked:

I'm now praying for the day when the Revelation will come to the Lords annointed that it is now time to take our youth out of the schools (predominately), and begin holding school at home or in our churches.

Amazing. This person apparently has either not heard that it is currently possible to homeschool your children or needs the Brethren's explicit authorization to make any decisions in life. I'm leaning towards the latter.

gramps wrote:what, the woman must have an orgasm for it to become a "serious" sin?

Everyone knows that female orgasm is not absolutely necessary for reproduction, and is therefore evil, carnal and sensual. If those girls were not deriving any pleasure out of it, their immorality could, perhaps, be excused. But if they were, there is no question about the seriousness of their sin.

You know, the same reasoning they apply to permissibility of aborting fetuses that were conceived as a result of rape as opposed to consensual sex.

Post by **_Zoidberg** » Sun Dec 02, 2007 5:55 pm

TAK wrote:Three years out of High School?? Why isn't this dork on a mission??

Maybe he's already home. He's probably 21. That would limit his dating experience to about 3 years.

And what's with steady dating 6 girls in high school? Haven't the Lord's annointed counseled against that?

Post by **_Bond...James Bond** » Sun Dec 02, 2007 5:55 pm

Here's my post (in case they try to edit it for using horny or something) over on MAD.

Here's my view:

1) Young people will always be young people....they will be horny and some of them will have sexual activities.

2) The young people grow up and some of them will "forget" that they were horny young men and women and will hypocritically say that young people are screwed up for being horny.

3) In the meantime their kids will grow up to be horny young people.

Basically young people will always be horny.

Post by **_TAK** » Sun Dec 02, 2007 6:02 pm

Zoidberg wrote:
TAK wrote:Three years out of High School?? Why isn't this dork on a mission??

Maybe he's already home. He's probably 21. That would limit his dating experience to about 3 years.

And what's with steady dating 6 girls in high school? Haven't the Lord's annointed counseled against that?

I think he said he dated "over a dozen post-high school" ..
Maybe he did not hit the new bar for mishys because he's the one that's been dorking all these girls..

Post by **_Gazelam** » Sun Dec 02, 2007 6:05 pm

TAK wrote:Three years out of High School?? Why isn't this dork on a mission??

Sounds like he had issues with the law of chastity and is sharing these new findings with us.

Post by **_Trevor** » Sun Dec 02, 2007 6:05 pm

TAK wrote:I think he said he dated "over a dozen post-high school" ..
Maybe he did not hit the new bar for mishys because he's the one that's been dorking all these girls..

LOL!!! That is too funny.

Post by **_Zoidberg** » Sun Dec 02, 2007 6:07 pm

TAK wrote:
Zoidberg wrote:
TAK wrote:Three years out of High School?? Why isn't this dork on a mission??

Maybe he's already home. He's probably 21. That would limit his dating experience to about 3 years.

And what's with steady dating 6 girls in high school? Haven't the Lord's annointed counseled against that?

I think he said he dated "over a dozen post-high school" ..
Maybe he did not hit the new bar for mishys because he's the one that's been dorking all these girls..

Yeah, really. Or maybe he's trolling. But the guy definitely does sound fishy, even aside from his obvious idiocy.

Post by **_MishMagnet** » Sun Dec 02, 2007 6:09 pm

Yeah, if he's been on a misson that would take 2 of his 3 years post-high school. When has he had the time to date 12 women? I think perhaps his idea of a date is discussing sexual experience and the oh-so important question of was orgasm acheived.

by the way, is he saying serious sin is an orgasm OR penetration? Or do the two coincide in his mind? (Obviously not keen on the BYU sport of 'dry sex' where nudity/penetration are not necessary).

Post by **_karl61** » Sun Dec 02, 2007 6:09 pm

the last person you would want to talk to for advice on life is a latter-day saint adolescent male; missionaries included. The next problem is when will they leave adolescents since there are thousands of LDS males who never learn to think for themselves. They live in a world of fantasy and fallacy; they have been told what to wear and say since they were infants; usually they start to think for themselves when they suddenly learn the not so adoring history of the Church, which then requires them to think. This I know because because I lived it. I'm forty-six and I'm just starting to psychologically leave adolescence. Maybe this had to do with the psychological gangrape that occured when I was nineteen when I was excommunicated.

regarding the post: I agree with the stats but disagree that it was written by a twenty-year old. I remember reading something where seventy-percent of married BYU females who took a survey- which was created by a sociology professor - reported that they had had sex prior to marriage.