Homosexuality from a Non-Religious perspective

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_asbestosman
_Emeritus
Posts: 6215
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 10:32 pm

Post by _asbestosman »

The Nehor wrote:To quote the cop in Rio on the Simpson's episode, "I am flattered but I do not swing that way." Unless it's at least a foursome.

Well, I do believe in polyposession. I'll let you pick the other three so long as at least 1.5 of them are hotties.
That's General Leo. He could be my friend if he weren't my enemy.
eritis sicut dii
I support NCMO
_The Nehor
_Emeritus
Posts: 11832
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2007 2:05 am

Post by _The Nehor »

asbestosman wrote:
The Nehor wrote:To quote the cop in Rio on the Simpson's episode, "I am flattered but I do not swing that way." Unless it's at least a foursome.

Well, I do believe in polyposession. I'll let you pick the other three so long as at least 1.5 of them are hotties.


So 3 half-hotties or one hottie and one half hottie? Do you prefer top, bottom, left, or right-side hotties?
"Surely he knows that DCP, The Nehor, Lamanite, and other key apologists..." -Scratch clarifying my status in apologetics
"I admit it; I'm a petty, petty man." -Some Schmo
_Blixa
_Emeritus
Posts: 8381
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2007 12:45 pm

Post by _Blixa »

Get. A. Room.

Far away.
From the Ernest L. Wilkinson Diaries: "ELW dreams he's spattered w/ grease. Hundreds steal his greasy pants."
_asbestosman
_Emeritus
Posts: 6215
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 10:32 pm

Post by _asbestosman »

The Nehor wrote:So 3 half-hotties or one hottie and one half hottie? Do you prefer top, bottom, left, or right-side hotties?

Two total hotties and one -1/2 un-hottie.
I prefer front hotties.
I might go for a few 2d4 hotties.
That's General Leo. He could be my friend if he weren't my enemy.
eritis sicut dii
I support NCMO
_MishMagnet
_Emeritus
Posts: 288
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 2:04 pm

Post by _MishMagnet »

Law abiding, tax paying citizens of legal age should be extended the same rights as other law abiding, tax paying citizens of legal age.

10% of the human population is homosexual. It's illegal to with hold legal rights from a minority group.

At the age of 20 I was told I'd never have children. When I married my husband it was with that understanding. We didn't marry to start a family. We married because we loved each other and wanted to be together. To be able to have children we had the same options that a gay couple has. Either donor eggs, surrogate or adoption. Children of gay couples deserve to have their families validated. These are children. Human beings. They deserve to be protected by law. They deserve legal validation.
Insert ironic quote from fellow board member here.
_Some Schmo
_Emeritus
Posts: 15602
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 2:59 pm

Post by _Some Schmo »

Posts like the one that started this thread are fine examples of why I tend not to discuss things like homosexuality with Mormons, and simply dismiss the person as "just another Mormon dumbass." It's not worth the effort to try to force common sense on lower life forms.
God belief is for people who don't want to live life on the universe's terms.
_jskains
_Emeritus
Posts: 1748
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2007 4:06 pm

Post by _jskains »

Some Schmo wrote:Posts like the one that started this thread are fine examples of why I tend not to discuss things like homosexuality with Mormons, and simply dismiss the person as "just another Mormon dumbass." It's not worth the effort to try to force common sense on lower life forms.


And it is comments like that where I don't discuss legit issues with blockheads like yourself.

JMS
_Bond...James Bond
_Emeritus
Posts: 4627
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 4:49 am

Post by _Bond...James Bond »

MishMagnet wrote:Law abiding, tax paying citizens of legal age should be extended the same rights as other law abiding, tax paying citizens of legal age.

10% of the human population is homosexual. It's illegal to with hold legal rights from a minority group.

[...]To be able to have children we had the same options that a gay couple has. Either donor eggs, surrogate or adoption. Children of gay couples deserve to have their families validated. These are children. Human beings. They deserve to be protected by law. They deserve legal validation.


I'd post something, but MM said everything I think about the subject.
"Whatever appears to be against the Book of Mormon is going to be overturned at some time in the future. So we can be pretty open minded."-charity 3/7/07
_asbestosman
_Emeritus
Posts: 6215
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 10:32 pm

Post by _asbestosman »

MishMagnet wrote:Children of gay couples deserve to have their families validated. These are children. Human beings. They deserve to be protected by law. They deserve legal validation.

Same with children of single parents whether that parent was widowed, divorced, or whatever.
That's General Leo. He could be my friend if he weren't my enemy.
eritis sicut dii
I support NCMO
_moksha
_Emeritus
Posts: 22508
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 8:42 pm

Re: Homosexuality from a Non-Religious perspective

Post by _moksha »

jskains wrote:
Bestiality anyone?


And you absolutely guarantee that no chickens will be injured?

Image
Cry Heaven and let loose the Penguins of Peace
Post Reply