A post for MAD

[_Trevor]

Trevor is just mad cause I called him on his own loud call for attention. hypocrisy rules these mean boards of Mormon DIscussions :)

JMS

LOL!!! Yeah, right.

[_jskains]

Trevor is just mad cause I called him on his own loud call for attention. hypocrisy rules these mean boards of Mormon DIscussions :)

JMS

LOL!!! Yeah, right.

Glad we agree. Moving on, moving on...

JMS

[_beastie]

Beastie likes to perform "armchair psychology". She has evaluated me, dug up as much dirt as she could find to prove her points, then continued to attack over and over and over and over. I made a comment asking if she got her psychology degree from a Crackerjack box, hence the title.

Attack = asking Josh to be accountable for his own words

Dug up dirt = finding one post from another board verifying Josh's self references to past issues

[_Trevor]

Glad we agree. Moving on, moving on...

You can stop looking at your reflection now.... really.

[_jskains]

Beastie likes to perform "armchair psychology". She has evaluated me, dug up as much dirt as she could find to prove her points, then continued to attack over and over and over and over. I made a comment asking if she got her psychology degree from a Crackerjack box, hence the title.

Attack = asking Josh to be accountable for his own words

Dug up dirt = finding one post from another board verifying Josh's self references to past issues

Yeah, you keep telling yourself that Dr. Crackerjack. Cross posting is still childish and acting like your in a position to tell someone they need psychological help is still arrogant. You can lie all you want, but in the end, all you wanted to do is discredit me. Your ego needed rubbing, and you certainly got it rubbed, didn't ya?

JMS

[_jskains]

Glad we agree. Moving on, moving on...

You can stop looking at your reflection now.... really.

I didn't know we looked so similar.

JMS

[_Gadianton]

all you wanted to do is discredit me

Josh, you keep accusing people of wanting to "discredit" you. OMG, c'mon man. "Discrediting" can only happen when someone has an actual reputation. For instance, it makes sense to talk about Gee, or Ritner, or Quinn being discredited by something unfavorable from the past. You're not a professor, or anyone in particular. In fact, despite your claims to having this mind that's like a machine which analyzes all input in every possible way, you consistently fail to be able to put a paragraph or two together of coherent argument. So when you come to this board, and throw up a couple of meandering and generally badly thought out posts, you haven't taken the first step yet towards being "discredited." First, you have to take someone in, win someone's respect. Get a following. But as you yourself point out, niether critics nor apologists respect your opinions. And, sorry bro, but it's for pretty good reasons. If you're as bright as you claim, you really, really need to increase your efforts. Once you get a single person in cyberworld thinking you've made some good points, then you can start worrying about character assassinations and plots to malign your significant reputation.

[_jskains]

all you wanted to do is discredit me

Josh, you keep accusing people of wanting to "discredit" you. OMG, c'mon man. "Discrediting" can only happen when someone has an actual reputation. For instance, it makes sense to talk about Gee, or Ritner, or Quinn being discredited by something unfavorable from the past. You're not a professor, or anyone in particular. In fact, despite your claims to having this mind that's like a machine which analyzes all input in every possible way, you consistently fail to be able to put a paragraph or two together of coherent argument. So when you come to this board, and throw up a couple of meandering and generally badly thought out posts, you haven't taken the first step yet towards being "discredited." First, you have to take someone in, win someone's respect. Get a following. But as you yourself point out, niether critics nor apologists respect your opinions. And, sorry bro, but it's for pretty good reasons. If you're as bright as you claim, you really, really need to increase your efforts. Once you get a single person in cyberworld thinking you've made some good points, then you can start worrying about character assassinations and plots to malign your significant reputation.

Hope that made you feel better. Big egos need lots of watering and feedings. In the end my request to be removed will be fulfilled and I will move on. You'll just be stuck here whining about the evils of Mormonism. And I am the nobody? Heh

JMS

[_Ray A]

all you wanted to do is discredit me

So when you come to this board, and throw up a couple of meandering and generally badly thought out posts, you haven't taken the first step yet towards being "discredited." First, you have to take someone in, win someone's respect. Get a following. But as you yourself point out, niether critics nor apologists respect your opinions. And, sorry bro, but it's for pretty good reasons. If you're as bright as you claim, you really, really need to increase your efforts. Once you get a single person in cyberworld thinking you've made some good points, then you can start worrying about character assassinations and plots to malign your significant reputation.

Are you one of Scratch's "informants"? If so, why are you talking about "credibility"?

[_Gadianton]

Josh,

What are you talking about? Your request to be removed? This isn't the church where you need a bunch of right hands giving you a vote of thanks and the authority of the priesthood to release you from a calling. You can just, go on, you know. And continue with your earth-shaking video commentary on religion.

Ray,

I'm happy for you and anyone else to think I'm a liar, dishonest, a jerk, or an immoral human being. It only makes me smile inside. If there is a God and Jesus, then I'm all the happier for doing Lucifer's work. I've lied before in my life and I'll lie again. Satan loves lying, and so do I.