Homosexuality from a Non-Religious perspective

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_jskains
_Emeritus
Posts: 1748
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2007 4:06 pm

Post by _jskains »

Trevor wrote:
jskains wrote:It is rather hard with the ugly flame war. So far I am a suicidal, depressed, diabetic who is mentally ill because I posted a Video Blog on Youtube.

JMS


Well, it was a pretty crappy video!


An example of the maturity, Thanks for the sample.

JMS
_Trevor
_Emeritus
Posts: 7213
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 6:28 pm

Post by _Trevor »

jskains wrote:An example of the maturity, Thanks for the sample.


An example of no sense of humor, which we get in practically every post you write.
“I was hooked from the start,” Snoop Dogg said. “We talked about the purpose of life, played Mousetrap, and ate brownies. The kids thought it was off the hook, for real.”
_JAK
_Emeritus
Posts: 1593
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 4:04 pm

Dodging the Issue

Post by _JAK »

jskains wrote:
josh,

I see that you have posted again recently. Would it be asking too much for you to participate in this thread that you started? My first question was posted to you above.

Thanks,
LSD


It is rather hard with the ugly flame war. So far I am a suicidal, depressed, diabetic who is mentally ill because I posted a Video Blog on Youtube.

JMS


It appears that you’re dodging the questions Jersey Girl has posed for you. Why is that? What you state here appears irrelevant to the issue before you.

JAK
_jskains
_Emeritus
Posts: 1748
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2007 4:06 pm

Post by _jskains »

Trevor wrote:
jskains wrote:An example of the maturity, Thanks for the sample.


An example of no sense of humor, which we get in practically every post you write.



OHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH I get it.. Calling me a ignorant combative mentally ill diabetic, futhered by two smear campaigns from Mr. Scratchy and Dr. Crackerjack were all just a big humorous joke?

Damn, am I just stupid. I'm sorry. Jokes on me.. Hahaha...

*eyeroll*

JMS
_Gazelam
_Emeritus
Posts: 5659
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 2:06 am

Post by _Gazelam »

Josh,

When someone makes a snarcky comment, instead of addressing the comment, try addressing the reason they made the comment.

Gaz
We can easily forgive a child who is afraid of the dark; the real tragedy of life is when men are afraid of the light. - Plato
_asbestosman
_Emeritus
Posts: 6215
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 10:32 pm

Post by _asbestosman »

Gazelam wrote:When someone makes a snarcky comment, instead of addressing the comment, try addressing the reason they made the comment.

I'm not sure I understand what you mean. From Josh's perspective would he be addressing the reason when he says that they make snarky comments because they're angry and obsessed? Somehow I don't think that's what you meant--otherwise I imagine you would have told Josh to only focus on the reasons instead of also addressing the snarky comments.
That's General Leo. He could be my friend if he weren't my enemy.
eritis sicut dii
I support NCMO
_Gazelam
_Emeritus
Posts: 5659
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 2:06 am

Post by _Gazelam »

Something like that. I'm not the most eloquent writer, which is why I tend to quote others alot.
We can easily forgive a child who is afraid of the dark; the real tragedy of life is when men are afraid of the light. - Plato
_JAK
_Emeritus
Posts: 1593
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 4:04 pm

Re: JAK hello.

Post by _JAK »

Bond...James Bond wrote:
Imwashingmypirate wrote:Might I say your post has made me think. WOW. I always thought homosexuality is disgusting and wrong but when I look at your prison statement, it is actually true. People (especially men) must fulfil their sexual needs somehow. It is instinct.


They could always masturbate....(talk about trying to decipher the lesser of two evils:masturbation or male homosexual sex?)


This is more sarcasm is it Bond?

If not, why do you characterize as “evils”?

Why not call these distinctions between joys?

JAK
_harmony
_Emeritus
Posts: 18195
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am

Re: JAK hello.

Post by _harmony »

JAK wrote:
Bond...James Bond wrote:
Imwashingmypirate wrote:Might I say your post has made me think. WOW. I always thought homosexuality is disgusting and wrong but when I look at your prison statement, it is actually true. People (especially men) must fulfil their sexual needs somehow. It is instinct.


They could always masturbate....(talk about trying to decipher the lesser of two evils:masturbation or male homosexual sex?)


This is more sarcasm is it Bond?

If not, why do you characterize as “evils”?

Why not call these distinctions between joys?

JAK


Because the LDS church defines them as evil and sin.
_JAK
_Emeritus
Posts: 1593
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 4:04 pm

Re: JAK hello.

Post by _JAK »

harmony wrote:
JAK wrote:
Bond...James Bond wrote:
Imwashingmypirate wrote:Might I say your post has made me think. WOW. I always thought homosexuality is disgusting and wrong but when I look at your prison statement, it is actually true. People (especially men) must fulfil their sexual needs somehow. It is instinct.


They could always masturbate....(talk about trying to decipher the lesser of two evils:masturbation or male homosexual sex?)


This is more sarcasm is it Bond?

If not, why do you characterize as “evils”?

Why not call these distinctions between joys?

JAK


Because the LDS church defines them as evil and sin.


The LDS church is irrelevant to definitions. Any and every religious group makes up its own mythology. Those mythologies do not agree on many aspects of “sin” and a wide variety of other claims.

Your statement is hardly an address of causality.

The LDS church calls drinking coffee “sin.” It’s equally irrelevant.

Is war “sin”? Is participation in a military system as an instrument of death “sin”? Some religious myths would say it is. The Quakers, for example, would call deliberate killing of people “sin” at the order of a goverment.

Sex or sexual experiences are hardly on the same scale as deliberate killing of other humans for any reason.

Hence, any notion of “sin” is relative. It’s relative to time, to place, and to circumstances in any religious myth concept.

JAK
Post Reply