jskains wrote:Am I still smarting from being "rejected" by FAIR? No... I am not the one trying to dig up the "past". That would be you. And some of your accusations were flat out lies, but guess you like to lie as you have said in another post.
JMS
Let me ask you again. Which of my "accusations" were "flat out lies"? Please be specific, my dear friend. I will wait patiently for you to enlighten me.
Go find someone else to bother. Your not popular here either, so don't know why you are on such a high horse.
JMS[/quote]
My dear friend Josh, I was merely trying to determine why you defined some statements of mine as "flat out lies," which, in my very humble view, is a rather serious characterization. By no means do I intend to come across as being on a "high horse." I'm just trying to figure out why you feel this way. So, I'm terribly sorry to have to ask you again, but: Which of my "accusations" were "flat out lies"? I would be very grateful if you could be as specific as possible. Thanks so much.[/quote]
jskains wrote:Am I still smarting from being "rejected" by FAIR? No... I am not the one trying to dig up the "past". That would be you. And some of your accusations were flat out lies, but guess you like to lie as you have said in another post.
JMS
Let me ask you again. Which of my "accusations" were "flat out lies"? Please be specific, my dear friend. I will wait patiently for you to enlighten me.
Go find someone else to bother. Your not popular here either, so don't know why you are on such a high horse.
JMS
My dear friend Josh, I was merely trying to determine why you defined some statements of mine as "flat out lies," which, in my very humble view, is a rather serious characterization. By no means do I intend to come across as being on a "high horse." I'm just trying to figure out why you feel this way. So, I'm terribly sorry to have to ask you again, but: Which of my "accusations" were "flat out lies"? I would be very grateful if you could be as specific as possible. Thanks so much.[/quote]
Sad... Truly sad.
JMS[/quote]
Huh? I've asked you three times now, and you've failed to provide any evidence to substantiate your claim. Would you care to revise what you said?
Huh? I've asked you three times now, and you've failed to provide any evidence to substantiate your claim. Would you care to revise what you said?
No.. Your not worth it. You know you've lied. I shouldn't have to point it out.
JMS
No, sorry, I don't. I am unaware of anything I've said about you which could possibly be construed as a "lie." Perhaps you feel that you "shouldn't have to point it out" because you know that you can't?
Huh? I've asked you three times now, and you've failed to provide any evidence to substantiate your claim. Would you care to revise what you said?
No.. Your not worth it. You know you've lied. I shouldn't have to point it out.
JMS
No, sorry, I don't. I am unaware of anything I've said about you which could possibly be construed as a "lie." Perhaps you feel that you "shouldn't have to point it out" because you know that you can't?
That must be it.. Good show "Scratchy". Now go find your rock and crawl back under it with all your other lizard friends.
Huh? I've asked you three times now, and you've failed to provide any evidence to substantiate your claim. Would you care to revise what you said?
No.. Your not worth it. You know you've lied. I shouldn't have to point it out.
JMS
No, sorry, I don't. I am unaware of anything I've said about you which could possibly be construed as a "lie." Perhaps you feel that you "shouldn't have to point it out" because you know that you can't?
That must be it.. Good show "Scratchy". Now go find your rock and crawl back under it with all your other lizard friends.
JMS
Very well, then. You have no evidence. You tried to label me a "liar," but, instead, it seems the label is a more apt descriptor of yourself. Shall I notify your Stake President about this?
Huh? I've asked you three times now, and you've failed to provide any evidence to substantiate your claim. Would you care to revise what you said?
No.. Your not worth it. You know you've lied. I shouldn't have to point it out.
JMS
No, sorry, I don't. I am unaware of anything I've said about you which could possibly be construed as a "lie." Perhaps you feel that you "shouldn't have to point it out" because you know that you can't?
That must be it.. Good show "Scratchy". Now go find your rock and crawl back under it with all your other lizard friends.
JMS
Very well, then. You have no evidence. You tried to label me a "liar," but, instead, it seems the label is a more apt descriptor of yourself. Shall I notify your Stake President about this?
You know, your so screwed up in the head and strangely obsessed about me I would not doubt you'd try.
Oh, an informant has told me that you started a website called www.mypenisistoosmall.com which is now defunct, where you complained about how small your penis is and how you wish it were a lot bigger and how you needed $500,000 for the enlargment process. You apparently thought an errect 1" was too small and are trying to get an additional 5"s.
jskains wrote:At 14, then 15, and finally at 16, I had three seperate crushes with three seperate girls.. All of them turned out to be Mormon. Understand that I was a computer geek, not well liked in school, labeled a "nerd". So I never asked any of these girls out, but watched from afar. WHen I turned 17, I thought a lot about Mormonism and religion, so I tried the "praying to God" thing. I prayed and prayed for a week straight. Then came the Mormon Missionaries. My crushes attached to an attracton to any idea that was "rebellious" or "out of the norm", I joined the Church in 2 weeks.
Josh, I think you're a classic example of why the church shouldn't rush people into baptisms.
If it were medicine we were talking about, that would be malpractice.
In my experience, it seems that for most of the Mormons that I talk to about how they joined the church, the defining moment was some sort of emotional crisis going on in their life.
Of course, that could be said for a lot of religions, I guess.
But, it seems that Mormonism caught that "one thing" that someone was looking for, or thinking about, and that's when they joined.
"What does God need with a starship?" - Captain James T. Kirk
Most people would like to be delivered from temptation but would like it to keep in touch. - Robert Orben
jskains wrote:Because to me, Traditional Christianity has as many, if not more holes than Mormon theology. Mormon theology fills gaps for me that make Christianity more believable. Hence if you remove Mormonism, the glue that allows me to believe in Christianity in the first place, it all falls away.
JMS
What are biggest couple of holes in traditional Christianity IYO.
Doctrinal development of creedal trinitariansim and it's lack of support in the Bible.
The Bible itself-internal inconsistencies, questionable authorship, compilation process, lack of evidence for most of the gospels outside of Bible.
Lack of evidence for miraculous events.
Lack of evidence for many Old Testament characters and scientific evidence that frankly makes much of the early Old Testament stories not probable.
Now, c'mon, Jason, you could similar things about the Book of Mormon.
"What does God need with a starship?" - Captain James T. Kirk
Most people would like to be delivered from temptation but would like it to keep in touch. - Robert Orben