OUT OF MY MISERY wrote:Once again Dr. Shades you tell it like it is and once again certain people will still not understand the point what you are trying to make. They will huff and puff and blow out hot air out their asses in order to justify the churches actions. Some people that aren't even Mormon will try and throw out scriptures in order to back up Mormon beliefs about the suffering the missionaries must endure.
I understand quite well what Shades is saying, and I tend to agree with him to a certain extent. However, there is another way of looking at it, and that is that missionary service is expected to be difficult, expected to be harsh, expected to be physically demanding. If it was less harsh, less growth would take place. Were the church to step in and make life easy for the missionaries, and by extension for the members, there would no doubt be a raft of criticism thrown at them, saying how they deprived those missionaries of learning what hardship is really about, and thereby shortchanged them of the missionary character building experiences their fathers had. Any character failure from then on would be blamed on the church, for failing to provide the optimum missionary experience (which is always the one that the previous generation had) because they erred by housing the missionaries in decent housing.
The church doesn't get to win in this argument, ever. Catch 22 for them.
The billion dollar church that spends more on a mall then they do on their missionaries leaves a bad taste in my mouth.
Don't ever join the Catholics. Monks and nuns live on a pittance while the pope lives in the lap of centuries of luxury. Don't ever think that the Mormons were the first or even the worst at this. They're just the ones we happen to know the best.