Sorry Coggy old boy. Harm does not need to answer these questions from you. Challenge her all you want about her church membership status. by the way I am pretty confident she is LDS. Not your down the chapel road LDS but LDS none the less. But you don't get to ask anyone these questions less you are their bishop or SP ( or counselor in an Bric or SPresidency).
Holy High Horsepucky my friend. I can ask her, or anyone else, these questions as a matter of a desire to know where they stand any time I wish. Not as a matter of judgment, but of clarification. Not a single one of these questions touch any subject beyond fundamental, rudimentary Church beliefs and practices. She won't answer them for the simple reason that if she did, her game would be up and she would be exposed for the utter and complete poseur that she is.
Harmony does not believe in virtually a single core truth claim of the LDS Church. Her Temple recommend, if she has one, has therefore been obtained fraudulently, and shame on you for supporting the game.
The face of sin today often wears the mask of tolerance.
Coggins7 wrote:Harmony does not believe in virtually a single core truth claim of the LDS Church. Her Temple recommend, if she has one, has therefore been obtained fraudulently, and shame on you for supporting the game.
Obviously you have a very shallow understanding of the process of getting a recommend.
“I was hooked from the start,” Snoop Dogg said. “We talked about the purpose of life, played Mousetrap, and ate brownies. The kids thought it was off the hook, for real.”
Sex and sex issues, promiscuity, affairs, illegitimate births and on and on have been arounf forever. The 60s and 70s did not suddenly bring about all this sexual activity. It brought it more into the open but it has been there all along. Not new man.
Sex is certainly not news. It's discussed in detail in the Old Testament, so it's at least 6000 years old.
Coggins7 wrote:Harmony does not believe in virtually a single core truth claim of the LDS Church. Her Temple recommend, if she has one, has therefore been obtained fraudulently, and shame on you for supporting the game.
Obviously you have a very shallow understanding of the process of getting a recommend.
Which speaks more to Loran's lack of understanding than to mine. And is why I respect Jason's opinion about all things having to do with ward leadership, and I respect none of Loran's.
harmony wrote:Which speaks more to Loran's lack of understanding than to mine.
Just want to clarify. My comments were addressed to little lord Loran.
“I was hooked from the start,” Snoop Dogg said. “We talked about the purpose of life, played Mousetrap, and ate brownies. The kids thought it was off the hook, for real.”
Sorry Coggy old boy. Harm does not need to answer these questions from you. Challenge her all you want about her church membership status. by the way I am pretty confident she is LDS. Not your down the chapel road LDS but LDS none the less. But you don't get to ask anyone these questions less you are their bishop or SP ( or counselor in an Bric or SPresidency).
Holy High Horsepucky my friend. I can ask her, or anyone else, these questions as a matter of a desire to know where they stand any time I wish. Not as a matter of judgment, but of clarification. Not a single one of these questions touch any subject beyond fundamental, rudimentary Church beliefs and practices. She won't answer them for the simple reason that if she did, her game would be up and she would be exposed for the utter and complete poseur that she is.
Harmony does not believe in virtually a single core truth claim of the LDS Church. Her Temple recommend, if she has one, has therefore been obtained fraudulently, and shame on you for supporting the game.
No game dude. She can opt to ingore your questions. And you are judging her. I know she is LDS, just not conventional. So if she tells you to go suck eggs then she is well within here right.
by the way, bully for you in using horsepucky!! One of my favorite words. My daddy used to say it quite often.
Sex and sex issues, promiscuity, affairs, illegitimate births and on and on have been arounf forever. The 60s and 70s did not suddenly bring about all this sexual activity. It brought it more into the open but it has been there all along. Not new man.
Logically irrelevant Jason. The late sixties began a cyclic return to a set of cultural dynamics that have come and gone for thousands of years of human history among various cultures and for which the Gospel has had the same critique during that entire time. The sixties began an unmistakable trend toward cultural dissolution and decline that has happened many times before and to which the Prophets, throughout time, have directed their critique. The patterns of sexual behavior, and the social pathologies generated as a consequence of them during this era, were and are a massive departure from a number of generations prior to them in Western societies as a matter of general cultural norms.
The sixties and seventies were what they were, I have never claimed they were unique to the point of being singular (although they were, of course, unique. The technology and media available in the modern era does put an new and different coloration upon ancient human proclivities).
The face of sin today often wears the mask of tolerance.
Sex and sex issues, promiscuity, affairs, illegitimate births and on and on have been arounf forever. The 60s and 70s did not suddenly bring about all this sexual activity. It brought it more into the open but it has been there all along. Not new man.
Logically irrelevant Jason. The late sixties began a cyclic return to a set of cultural dynamics that have come and gone for thousands of years of human history among various cultures and for which the Gospel has had the same critique during that entire time. The sixties began an unmistakable trend toward cultural dissolution and decline that has happened many times before and to which the Prophets, throughout time, have directed their critique. The patterns of sexual behavior, and the social pathologies generated as a consequence of them during this era, were and are a massive departure from a number of generations prior to them in Western societies as a matter of general cultural norms.
The sixties and seventies were what they were, I have never claimed they were unique to the point of being singular (although they were, of course, unique. The technology and media available in the modern era does put an new and different coloration upon ancient human proclivities).
Ok. Sure it put some new spin on things. But immoral behavior in regards to sex and how we believe the scriptures and God defines it has been going on for a long, long time. I just do not think it is new since then. We were not a moral prim and proper people about this before that and certainly are not now.
Coggins7 wrote:The sixties began an unmistakable trend toward cultural dissolution and decline that has happened many times before and to which the Prophets, throughout time, have directed their critique.
That's a mighty big historical claim.
“I was hooked from the start,” Snoop Dogg said. “We talked about the purpose of life, played Mousetrap, and ate brownies. The kids thought it was off the hook, for real.”
Coggins7 wrote:The sixties began an unmistakable trend toward cultural dissolution and decline that has happened many times before and to which the Prophets, throughout time, have directed their critique.
That's a mighty big historical claim.
How could the sixties begin an unmistakeable trend that has happened many times before?