questions for Joseph Smith when he shows up at the temple

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_Bond...James Bond
_Emeritus
Posts: 4627
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 4:49 am

Post by _Bond...James Bond »

Blixa wrote:I'd ask him if that was a flaming sword in his pocket or if he was just happy to see me.


I believe that's ole Bond.....well more of a dagger...a small dagger.
"Whatever appears to be against the Book of Mormon is going to be overturned at some time in the future. So we can be pretty open minded."-charity 3/7/07
_Coggins7
_Emeritus
Posts: 3679
Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 12:25 am

Post by _Coggins7 »

I think Joseph as a counter-jest should meet you all with that list in hand after your deaths. I think it would be funny.



This is the best thing I've seen here in the last six months. Bravo!
The face of sin today often wears the mask of tolerance.


- Thomas S. Monson
_Pokatator
_Emeritus
Posts: 1417
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 12:38 pm

Post by _Pokatator »

Moot musings, kind of fun but I think he is were ever he is and ain't going to appear anywhere. At this point he is about as real as Moroni.
I think it would be morally right to lie about your religion to edit the article favorably.
bcspace
_Tidejwe
_Emeritus
Posts: 80
Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2007 3:14 am

Re: questions for Joseph Smith when he shows up at the templ

Post by _Tidejwe »

Sethbag wrote:10. Of what nature was his "sealing" to Fanny Alger when their romp in the barn was discovered at least a couple of years before the sealing power was supposed to have been restored in Kirtland? Did God tell Joseph Smith he could romp around with Fanny behind his own legitimate wife's back, or was that his own stroke of brilliance?


Could someone provide some references to the first question of #10 for me please? (I'm just interested in reading MORE of this PARTICULAR example of secondary "romping" before the sealing power was even restored)
_karl61
_Emeritus
Posts: 2983
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 6:29 pm

Post by _karl61 »

The Nehor wrote:
Dr. Shades wrote:
The Nehor wrote:I'd ask to shake his hand. After that, I'd see if he had anything to say.


I thought you'd already met him.


That was somebody else Shades.


I had a dream that I met him a few months ago. It's in my blog - along with other stuff.

But I would ask him who is going to win the next super bowl.
I want to fly!
_Ten Bear
_Emeritus
Posts: 251
Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2007 7:45 pm

Post by _Ten Bear »

Coggins7 wrote:
As soon as anyone comes up with a shred of documentary historical evidence, the kind you would need to back up a claim such as that, please let me know.

In the meantime, back to the mysteries of the universe...


There may or may not be evidence. Sometimes it doesn't matter.

my wife and I were married for two years before we had our first child. The question is, did my wife and I exercise all rights as a married couple in those two years? I would challenge you to find one "shred of documentary evidence". What kind of evidence would you need? Everyone else here knows the answer, except maybe you - which is one of the mysteries of the universe.
"If False, it is one of the most cunning, wicked, bold, deep-laid impositions ever palmed upon the world, calculated to deceive and ruin millions… " - Orson Pratt on The Book of Mormon
_MishMagnet
_Emeritus
Posts: 288
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 2:04 pm

Post by _MishMagnet »

The Mormon church HAS provided historical evidence in rebuttal to the RLDS church and Emma Smith's denial that Joseph Smith practiced polygamy. Sworn affidavits that sex took place in 13 cases. I find it ironic that the earlier church went to such great pains to prove it did happen and the modern church is taking such great pains to do the opposite.

I have zero fear of Joseph Smith grilling me after my death. I've been a faithful wife, I haven't stolen my followers money, I haven't lived in a 'mansion' while my followers lived in cabins, I haven't been brought to court for fraud, I have good credit, I pay my debts, I have no criminal record and live a pretty boring suburban life. Bring it on, man, bring it on.
Insert ironic quote from fellow board member here.
_Runtu
_Emeritus
Posts: 16721
Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2006 5:06 am

Post by _Runtu »

MishMagnet wrote:The Mormon church HAS provided historical evidence in rebuttal to the RLDS church and Emma Smith's denial that Joseph Smith practiced polygamy. Sworn affidavits that sex took place in 13 cases. I find it ironic that the earlier church went to such great pains to prove it did happen and the modern church is taking such great pains to do the opposite.


Yep. Our friend Hammer went so far as to say that the women who swore affidavits were lying. Unbelievable.

I have zero fear of Joseph Smith grilling me after my death. I've been a faithful wife, I haven't stolen my followers money, I haven't lived in a 'mansion' while my followers lived in cabins, I haven't been brought to court for fraud, I have good credit, I pay my debts, I have no criminal record and live a pretty boring suburban life. Bring it on, man, bring it on.


I'm not worried about it either. If there is a God, and I hope there is, I'll tell him with a clear conscience that I followed the truth the best I could. Coggins can hurl everything he wants at me, but my conscience is clear.
Runtu's Rincón

If you just talk, I find that your mouth comes out with stuff. -- Karl Pilkington
_Yoda

Post by _Yoda »

Runtu wrote:Coggins can hurl....


Hmmm....this is a worthy signature in the making.

;)
_harmony
_Emeritus
Posts: 18195
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am

Post by _harmony »

I would simply ask him to justify canonizing his lies.
Post Reply