KimberlyAnn wrote:The new lightning rod over on MAD seems awfully familiar to me, and though I don't want to out anyone, a little speculation can be fun.
I can't quite put my finger on who's posting as GoodK, but I feel fairly certain it's someone with whom I'm familiar from this board or RfM.
No matter who is posting as GoodK, she/he is providing plenty of entertainment over on MAD!
KA
I don't think I know you, but maybe. I am certainly not a previous poster hiding behind the name GoodK. I'm just a newbie, but I'm so excited my posts have proven this entertaining. So begins GoodK's career in polemics!
KimberlyAnn wrote:The new lightning rod over on MAD seems awfully familiar to me, and though I don't want to out anyone, a little speculation can be fun.
I can't quite put my finger on who's posting as GoodK, but I feel fairly certain it's someone with whom I'm familiar from this board or RfM.
No matter who is posting as GoodK, she/he is providing plenty of entertainment over on MAD!
KA
I don't think I know you, but maybe. I am certainly not a previous poster hiding behind the name GoodK. I'm just a newbie, but I'm so excited my posts have proven this entertaining. So begins GoodK's career in polemics!
Welcome, GoodK! It's good to see you here.
KA
And I second (or third or fourth) the welcome! I'm one of those who thought your style seems familiar, although I can't say exactly why.
Either way, you provided me with much of interest to read over on the other board, and I welcome your contributions here.
I may be going to hell in a bucket, babe / But at least I'm enjoying the ride.
-Grateful Dead (lyrics by John Perry Barlow)
GoodK wrote:I'm GoodK. I hate to put a damper on all the mystery surrounding my real identity... just refer to me as the man(or woman) who defeated Dan Peterson, or as I like to call him, The Professor Dumbeldore of Mormon "apologetics"!
I'm not sure how you "defeated" Dan. Can you enlighten me?
GoodK wrote:I'm GoodK. I hate to put a damper on all the mystery surrounding my real identity... just refer to me as the man(or woman) who defeated Dan Peterson, or as I like to call him, The Professor Dumbeldore of Mormon "apologetics"!
I'm not sure how you "defeated" Dan. Can you enlighten me?
Sure I'd love to.
The first post of this thread sums it up pretty well, but let me know if you have any questions/concerns:
GoodK wrote:I'm GoodK. I hate to put a damper on all the mystery surrounding my real identity... just refer to me as the man(or woman) who defeated Dan Peterson, or as I like to call him, The Professor Dumbeldore of Mormon "apologetics"!
I'm not sure how you "defeated" Dan. Can you enlighten me?
Sure I'd love to.
The first post of this thread sums it up pretty well, but let me know if you have any questions/concerns:
I don't care for Scratch's commentary. I'm reading through the original thread on MAD. I still don't see where you "defeated" him.
Well, there is certainly room for interpretation, but I think it is safe to say anyone who isn't an apologist or a personal friend of Dan's, would disagree with the assessment expressed here.
Just look at how Scott Loyd is babbling on about how GoodK was only removed because she broke rules.
What a hoot.
“All knowledge of reality starts from experience and ends in it...Propositions arrived at by purely logical means are completely empty as regards reality." - Albert Einstein
GoodK wrote:I'm GoodK. I hate to put a damper on all the mystery surrounding my real identity... just refer to me as the man(or woman) who defeated Dan Peterson, or as I like to call him, The Professor Dumbeldore of Mormon "apologetics"!
I'm not sure how you "defeated" Dan. Can you enlighten me?
Sure I'd love to.
The first post of this thread sums it up pretty well, but let me know if you have any questions/concerns:
I don't care for Scratch's commentary. I'm reading through the original thread on MAD. I still don't see where you "defeated" him.
Well you are in good company I suppose. I'm sure plenty of Dan Peterson fans would agree with you.
A lot of people can't see the 3D image in those "Magic Eye" posters either.
And I think Scratch quotes our conversation adequately, and without distracting comments from the peanut gallery, but of course a regular theme over at the MAD is to question the reliablity of evidence ad naseum, and you are certainly welcome to employ that tactic as well.
just refer to me as the man(or woman) who defeated Dan Peterson,
You're neither the first nor the last, so you'll have to go by some other honorary title.
“All knowledge of reality starts from experience and ends in it...Propositions arrived at by purely logical means are completely empty as regards reality." - Albert Einstein