So how could I have handed this better?

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_Moniker
_Emeritus
Posts: 4004
Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2007 11:53 pm

Post by _Moniker »

Harmony, sorry that this was even asked of you. Good for you for sticking to your guns. I would have caved and then been pissed at myself later for it.

It's not your responsibility to accommodate this family and if there is an alternate place (so what if it's a bit less inconvenient) then they should use it.

What is really galling about this scenario is that these women (that transport the food) don't want to be put out by 20 minutes but want to inconvenience you on an incredibly special day. Don't feel guilty or anything about this at all!

The woman that couldn't appreciate YOUR situation is the one that should feel horrid for asking that of you!
_Jason Bourne
_Emeritus
Posts: 9207
Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 8:00 pm

Re: So how could I have handed this better?

Post by _Jason Bourne »

harmony wrote:Here's what's happening:



What do you think? Should I have done something different?


I think you handled it quite fine.

It seems it was not so much for the family that lost the child but for those preparing the meal. When I had control over these types of things weddings and funerals always took precedence but if the two things conflicted it was usually who had the building first or who it would be harder on the do something different. I think a wedding, where you have invited people takes precedence assuming there were other facilities not to terribly far away to use the other event.
_Trinity
_Emeritus
Posts: 426
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 12:36 pm

Post by _Trinity »

You couldn't have handled it better, and I think most reasonable people will understand.
"I think one of the great mysteries of the gospel is that anyone still believes it." Sethbag, MADB, Feb 22 2008
_Jersey Girl
_Emeritus
Posts: 34407
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:16 am

Post by _Jersey Girl »

Hi harm,

Unfortunate circumstances to be sure. I don't think it useful to consider turning the wedding plans upside down in order to accomodate the funeral meal. Isn't there another Ward or Stake building that can be used? If the sisters don't wish to truck food an extra 20 miles and if the Relief Society lady really wants to lend support then why couldn't she find a youth or two willing to give service by driving one of many vans (don't tell me they don't have vans available I know better) transport the food, deliver, unpack it and come back to clean the building. Sheesh!

What is wrong with people? No creativity whatsoever!

Jersey Girl
;-)

My best wishes will be with you on Saturday!
_msnobody
_Emeritus
Posts: 912
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 4:28 am

Post by _msnobody »

Now if they had just chosen to be Methodists or Baptists they could load all that food on the church bus to transport it. J/K

I have to agree with the consensus here. Your plans have been made for a while and many probably finalized. The funeral party could go to the next best location to have dinner. I think you did the right thing, Harm- firm but tactful.
_The Nehor
_Emeritus
Posts: 11832
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2007 2:05 am

Post by _The Nehor »

I just have images of a combined wedding/funeral. Might be fun. :)
"Surely he knows that DCP, The Nehor, Lamanite, and other key apologists..." -Scratch clarifying my status in apologetics
"I admit it; I'm a petty, petty man." -Some Schmo
_bcspace
_Emeritus
Posts: 18534
Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2006 6:48 pm

Post by _bcspace »

Perhaps, assuming you would acquiesce, she made a promise before she called you?
Machina Sublime
Satan's Plan Deconstructed.
Your Best Resource On Joseph Smith's Polygamy.
Conservatism is the Gospel of Christ and the Plan of Salvation in Action.
The Degeneracy Of Progressivism.
_charity
_Emeritus
Posts: 2327
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 3:30 pm

Post by _charity »

Just a couple of weeks ago, we covered this in our combined third hour. The bishop we through sections of the CHI as peole asked questions.

The rule in the CHI is that funerals take precedence. But usually some accomodation can be made as to time, particulalrly of the funeral since it has been scheduled within the last few days.

But the Relief Society president had the backing of church policy behind her.
_harmony
_Emeritus
Posts: 18195
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am

Post by _harmony »

charity wrote:Just a couple of weeks ago, we covered this in our combined third hour. The bishop we through sections of the CHI as peole asked questions.

The rule in the CHI is that funerals take precedence. But usually some accomodation can be made as to time, particulalrly of the funeral since it has been scheduled within the last few days.

But the Relief Society president had the backing of church policy behind her.


No funeral. Just a graveside service. This was just the family dinner. So I guess she didn't have the backing of church policy.
_moksha
_Emeritus
Posts: 22508
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 8:42 pm

Post by _moksha »

harmony wrote:
charity wrote:Just a couple of weeks ago, we covered this in our combined third hour. The bishop we through sections of the CHI as peole asked questions.

The rule in the CHI is that funerals take precedence. But usually some accomodation can be made as to time, particulalrly of the funeral since it has been scheduled within the last few days.

But the Relief Society president had the backing of church policy behind her.


No funeral. Just a graveside service. This was just the family dinner. So I guess she didn't have the backing of church policy.


This is a tough thing, since I view them as both important (although you have first dibs). Is there an alternate Church for them to have the dinner at?
Cry Heaven and let loose the Penguins of Peace
Post Reply