Who wants smilies?

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.

Do you want smilies?

 
Total votes: 0

_Moniker
_Emeritus
Posts: 4004
Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2007 11:53 pm

Post by _Moniker »

Not finished complaining.

I'd like these:

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image
_Ray A

Post by _Ray A »

Moniker wrote:Image


Excellent. Now I can iconise my customers.
_Blixa
_Emeritus
Posts: 8381
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2007 12:45 pm

Post by _Blixa »

*sigh* soooo disappointed...
From the Ernest L. Wilkinson Diaries: "ELW dreams he's spattered w/ grease. Hundreds steal his greasy pants."
_Bond...James Bond
_Emeritus
Posts: 4627
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 4:49 am

Post by _Bond...James Bond »

Blixa wrote:*sigh* soooo disappointed...


I'm sure you can be consoled... ;)
"Whatever appears to be against the Book of Mormon is going to be overturned at some time in the future. So we can be pretty open minded."-charity 3/7/07
_Blixa
_Emeritus
Posts: 8381
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2007 12:45 pm

Post by _Blixa »

Bond...James Bond wrote:
Blixa wrote:*sigh* soooo disappointed...


I'm sure you can be consoled... ;)


Sadly no. The time limit on that has expired (and I'm not saying anymore about that here!)
From the Ernest L. Wilkinson Diaries: "ELW dreams he's spattered w/ grease. Hundreds steal his greasy pants."
_Bond...James Bond
_Emeritus
Posts: 4627
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 4:49 am

Post by _Bond...James Bond »

Blixa wrote:
Bond...James Bond wrote:
Blixa wrote:*sigh* soooo disappointed...


I'm sure you can be consoled... ;)


Sadly no. The time limit on that has expired (and I'm not saying anymore about that here!)


Sorry. :(
"Whatever appears to be against the Book of Mormon is going to be overturned at some time in the future. So we can be pretty open minded."-charity 3/7/07
_Dr. Shades
_Emeritus
Posts: 14117
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:07 pm

Post by _Dr. Shades »

Moniker wrote:Not finished complaining.

I'd like these: [SNIP!]


Each of those are entirely unnecessary.

Blixa wrote:*sigh* soooo disappointed...


As am I, Blixa. As am I.

We'll go with the mob rule for now, but if there is any abuse of the smilies, the smilies are gone.

I'm also considering dropping them down to just a single smilie--the basic one--since it is sufficient to convey the idea of sarcasm and/or tongue-in-cheekness, which is the only real reason for a smilie in the first place.
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"

--Louis Midgley
_charity
_Emeritus
Posts: 2327
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 3:30 pm

Post by _charity »

Why do I only get ;) when I click on the ;) emoticon? This is no improvement.
_Bond...James Bond
_Emeritus
Posts: 4627
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 4:49 am

Post by _Bond...James Bond »

charity wrote:Why do I only get ;) when I click on the ;) emoticon? This is no improvement.


Under the box where you type your text make sure you don't have smilies disabled.
"Whatever appears to be against the Book of Mormon is going to be overturned at some time in the future. So we can be pretty open minded."-charity 3/7/07
_Bond...James Bond
_Emeritus
Posts: 4627
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 4:49 am

Post by _Bond...James Bond »

Dr. Shades wrote:
Moniker wrote:Not finished complaining.

I'd like these: [SNIP!]


Each of those are entirely unnecessary.


Hey Shades...what about those ones I suggested? I went for the smallest, least flashy ones I could find.
"Whatever appears to be against the Book of Mormon is going to be overturned at some time in the future. So we can be pretty open minded."-charity 3/7/07
Post Reply