New Joseph Smith Manual at odds with Hinckley over polygamy?

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_dooosh
_Emeritus
Posts: 44
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 3:22 am

Post by _dooosh »

Ray A wrote:
Trinity wrote:My experience was just like dooosh's. I felt uncomfortable, discomfited and downright scared the first time I went through. Does this reaction mean the temple ceremony did not come from God?

Well, I think so.


That's your opinion. Will you consider mine? Or is yours and doooooooosh's "objective fact"?
Yeah, your experience was soooo special that it kept you from "sinning" and being excommunicated.

Right?

Actions speak louder than words. I find little value in anything you say until you are 100% commited to being a member of this that you defend.

In America we say put up or shut up.
"I'm sorry, I just don't see it. Charity IS a douche." -Merc
_Ray A

Post by _Ray A »

dooosh wrote:Right?

Actions speak louder than words. I find little value in anything you say until you are 100% commited to being a member of this that you defend.

In America we say put up or shut up.


And if I was a 100% committed member, guess what Porter would say - You are a dupe! deluded.

I can defend what, in principle, I believe to be true, or of good report. I can defend honest people from your vicious and unprincipaled attacks because you want them to be drunken bastards like you. I don't need a microscope to see honour, Porter, even if I am weak, but all I see in you is bitterness, revenge, and sour grapes. You stink with anger against Mormonism, and Mormons. If you are so "liberated" from "the cult", then why the F****** hell don't you leave it alone?

In Australia we have a saying: "Live, and let live."
_dooosh
_Emeritus
Posts: 44
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 3:22 am

Post by _dooosh »

Ray A wrote:
dooosh wrote:Right?

Actions speak louder than words. I find little value in anything you say until you are 100% commited to being a member of this that you defend.

In America we say put up or shut up.


And if I was a 100% committed member, guess what Porter would say - You are a dupe! deluded.

I can defend what, in principle, I believe to be true, or of good report. I can defend honest people from your vicious and unprincipaled attacks because you want them to be drunken bastards like you. I don't need a microscope to see honour, Porter, even if I am weak, but all I see in you is bitterness, revenge, and sour grapes. You stink with anger against Mormonism, and Mormons. If you are so "liberated" from "the cult", then why the F****** hell don't you leave it alone?

In Australia we have a saying: "Live, and let live."
Really? Like leave the people alone and let the live without being bothered by Briggie's brigade of bicycle riding Bible bashing bastards?

Tell ya what mate, get the young pushy Mormon salesfools off the front porches and I will stop giving out my secret name(BOAZ) and all of the secrets of the Mormon masonic fun house of horrors.

Deal?
"I'm sorry, I just don't see it. Charity IS a douche." -Merc
_Ray A

Post by _Ray A »

dooosh wrote:Get the young pushy Mormon salesfools off the front porches and I will stop giving out my secret name(BOAZ) and all of the secrets of the Mormon masonic fun house of horrors.

Deal?


I'm really intrigued by your anger. Do you know I predicted this in 1987?

Maybe I should finish my draft post to Infymus.

You see, Port, the issue here isn't the truth about Mormonism. Historical cover-ups don't prove Mormonism false. You have deducted false conclusions from false premises. The sort of things most people do.
_dooosh
_Emeritus
Posts: 44
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 3:22 am

Post by _dooosh »

Ray A wrote:
dooosh wrote:Get the young pushy Mormon salesfools off the front porches and I will stop giving out my secret name(BOAZ) and all of the secrets of the Mormon masonic fun house of horrors.

Deal?


I'm really intrigued by your anger. Do you know I predicted this in 1987?

Maybe I should finish my draft post to Infymus.

You see, Port, the issue here isn't the truth about Mormonism. Historical cover-ups don't prove Mormonism false. You have deducted false conclusions from false premises. The sort of things most people do.
This coming from an excommunicated member who will not put his money where his mouth is and rejoin. *rolls eyes*
"I'm sorry, I just don't see it. Charity IS a douche." -Merc
_Ray A

Post by _Ray A »

dooosh wrote:Really? Like leave the people alone and let the live without being bothered by Briggie's brigade of bicycle riding Bible bashing bastards?


Your imagination has run wild here. "Briggie's brigade" is now viewed as a very viable alternative to junkies, criminals, thieves, killers and abusers. Some Aussies will die to see their young people walk down the streets in a suit and tie, instead of a fazed look through heroin-addicted eyes. The Mormons are a breath of fresh air to a drunkard culture whose religion is sport. I deal with these drunk, loser F***wits every night. And YOU want to encourage this.

dooosh wrote:Tell ya what mate, get the young pushy Mormon salesfools off the front porches and I will stop giving out my secret name(BOAZ) and all of the secrets of the Mormon masonic fun house of horrors.

Deal?


What is this BOAZ stuff. You lost me.
_dooosh
_Emeritus
Posts: 44
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 3:22 am

Post by _dooosh »

Ray A wrote:
dooosh wrote:Really? Like leave the people alone and let the live without being bothered by Briggie's brigade of bicycle riding Bible bashing bastards?


Your imagination has run wild here. "Briggie's brigade" is now viewed as a very viable alternative to junkies, criminals, thieves, killers and abusers. Some Aussies will die to see their young people walk down the streets in a suit and tie, instead of a fazed look through heroin-addicted eyes. The Mormons are a breath of fresh air to a drunkard culture whose religion is sport. I deal with these drunk, loser F***wits every night. And YOU want to encourage this.

dooosh wrote:Tell ya what mate, get the young pushy Mormon salesfools off the front porches and I will stop giving out my secret name(BOAZ) and all of the secrets of the Mormon masonic fun house of horrors.

Deal?


What is this BOAZ stuff. You lost me.
Sweet, I made you say(type) my secret temple name!

What was your name?

Do you get it back if/when you return?

by the way, my wife's temple name was Lidia.
"I'm sorry, I just don't see it. Charity IS a douche." -Merc
_Ray A

Post by _Ray A »

dooosh wrote:Sweet, I made you say(type) my secret temple name!

What was your name?

Do you get it back if/when you return?

by the way, my wife's temple name was Lidia.


Oh, I remember now. You revealed that before. Okay, deal. I will tell you my temple name: Saddam Hussein.
_the road to hana
_Emeritus
Posts: 1485
Joined: Wed Dec 06, 2006 4:35 pm

Post by _the road to hana »

dooosh wrote:
Ray A wrote:
dooosh wrote:Get the young pushy Mormon salesfools off the front porches and I will stop giving out my secret name(BOAZ) and all of the secrets of the Mormon masonic fun house of horrors.

Deal?


I'm really intrigued by your anger. Do you know I predicted this in 1987?

Maybe I should finish my draft post to Infymus.

You see, Port, the issue here isn't the truth about Mormonism. Historical cover-ups don't prove Mormonism false. You have deducted false conclusions from false premises. The sort of things most people do.
This coming from an excommunicated member who will not put his money where his mouth is and rejoin. *rolls eyes*


Hello pot, meet kettle.

Ray, in all my years on the boards I've never seen anyone spout more venom than you have, and that includes at the LDS Church and those who defend it.
The road is beautiful, treacherous, and full of twists and turns.
_Infymus
_Emeritus
Posts: 1584
Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 7:10 pm

Post by _Infymus »

Ray A wrote:
dooosh wrote:Get the young pushy Mormon salesfools off the front porches and I will stop giving out my secret name(BOAZ) and all of the secrets of the Mormon masonic fun house of horrors.

Deal?


I'm really intrigued by your anger. Do you know I predicted this in 1987?

Maybe I should finish my draft post to Infymus.

You see, Port, the issue here isn't the truth about Mormonism. Historical cover-ups don't prove Mormonism false. You have deducted false conclusions from false premises. The sort of things most people do.


You still never explained why you were excommunicated and if you were re baptized.

So in 1987 you made a Mormon Cult Priesthood prediction that Dooosh would make a post on MDB that you'd be able to quote?
Post Reply