Gossip

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_Ren
_Emeritus
Posts: 1387
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2007 11:34 am

Post by _Ren »

Moniker wrote:'Course I may just be like Wade when I say, "That may just be me."

It's certainly got a ring to it :)
_Moniker
_Emeritus
Posts: 4004
Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2007 11:53 pm

Post by _Moniker »

RenegadeOfPhunk wrote:
Moniker wrote:'Course I may just be like Wade when I say, "That may just be me."

It's certainly got a ring to it :)


And I'm 100% positive there are many people on this website and on MAD (you included) that am glad I keep secrets....

So I suppose it's a good thing, eh?

:)
_Ren
_Emeritus
Posts: 1387
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2007 11:34 am

Post by _Ren »

Moniker wrote:And I'm 100% positive there are many people on this website and on MAD (you included) that am glad I keep secrets....

So I suppose it's a good thing, eh?

:)

For sure!
*Remembers that jokes aren't always appropriate...!*
_harmony
_Emeritus
Posts: 18195
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am

Post by _harmony »

RenegadeOfPhunk wrote:
Moniker wrote:And I'm 100% positive there are many people on this website and on MAD (you included) that am glad I keep secrets....

So I suppose it's a good thing, eh?

:)

For sure!
*Remembers that jokes aren't always appropriate...!*


The best kept secrets are those that are not shared, ever.
_Ren
_Emeritus
Posts: 1387
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2007 11:34 am

Post by _Ren »

harmony wrote:The best kept secrets are those that are not shared, ever.

*shrug* Possibly.

Could also make life fairly boring.
...and a tad lonely perhaps...
_harmony
_Emeritus
Posts: 18195
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am

Post by _harmony »

RenegadeOfPhunk wrote:
harmony wrote:The best kept secrets are those that are not shared, ever.

*shrug* Possibly.

Could also make life fairly boring.
...and a tad lonely perhaps...


Moral of the story is, if you don't want your secrets shared with people you don't want them shared with, don't share them at all.
_Ren
_Emeritus
Posts: 1387
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2007 11:34 am

Post by _Ren »

harmony wrote:Moral of the story is, if you don't want your secrets shared with people you don't want them shared with, don't share them at all

Agreed :)
_Moniker
_Emeritus
Posts: 4004
Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2007 11:53 pm

Post by _Moniker »

harmony wrote:
RenegadeOfPhunk wrote:
harmony wrote:The best kept secrets are those that are not shared, ever.

*shrug* Possibly.

Could also make life fairly boring.
...and a tad lonely perhaps...


Moral of the story is, if you don't want your secrets shared with people you don't want them shared with, don't share them at all.


So true! Unfortunately someone else may share your story with others. Then what do you do? Anyway. Secrets between 2 people best be kept between them.

Anyway, Ren, you're right -- it is lonely. Lesson learned -- trust only those that are trustworthy.
_wenglund
_Emeritus
Posts: 4947
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 7:25 pm

Post by _wenglund »

RenegadeOfPhunk wrote:Well, I've always understood the term 'gossip' to emphasise discussing details about others that would be generally acknowledged as being 'personal' information. I.e. information that it is known the person (or group) involved don't / haven't announced publicly - and perhaps mentioned in confidence to one other person, or a small select group of people.

Discussing things about a person or group that the person or group themselves have made public wouldn't come across as 'gossip' to me. At least, that's not the term that would come to my mind to describe it. Even if the discussion in question was negative, and I thought badly of it - still - 'gossip' wouldn't be the first word to mind.

'Smearing' - sure.
'Attacking' - sure.

...but 'gossip'?


Point well taken...which is why I backed off somewhat in my earlier post. To me, it isn't so much important whether certain labels like "gossip" fit certain types of communications or not, but whether the communications service a constructive or destructive purpose of not.

During my short stint in politics (I helped a candidate run for the US Senate in Vermont back in the early 1980's) I was made privy to disfavorable and often false rumors that were being spread about my candidate and, in part, ended up costing him the election. I considered the rumors to be "gossip", but I was later informed that the preferred term was "whisper campaigns", and was classified as "dirty tricks" (a term made famous following the last Nixon campaign). I am fine with it being called whatever, just as long as people understand that such communications are utimately deletarious to all parties concerned.

Thanks, -Wade Englund-
_personage
_Emeritus
Posts: 103
Joined: Thu May 10, 2007 4:08 pm

Post by _personage »

Tori wrote
;)[/quote]
I remember something we use to teach in YW, a way to determine if what you are saying is actually gossip. Something like, "If it is true, if it is nice, and if it is necessary". (((scratching head))).

Dontchya think if you have to stop and think about something before you say it, (if it's true/ necessary) maybe you should'New Testament say it at all? I never did understand that lesson. I like to remember something my mother always told me, "If you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all.[/quote]


That is basically the Socrates "triple filter test" with different terminology. I have always thought it was a brilliant lesson taught by a very wise man.
Post Reply