2nd annointings and Elder Packer - does it explain anything?

[_rcrocket]

The simple fact remains that you all are getting all jazzed and excited about an anonymous post. He's a coward. You are a coward. And, no, I don't post with my own name because I made some mistake in doing so some time ago. I have posted with my own name since the days of BBS echo boards.

And how noble that makes you!!

I'm sure your family members were equally appreciative when their personal information was posted by an internet stalker.

Hmm. As you recall, YOU were that stalker. And quite malicious, too. But, I have come to love and respect your brand of humorless malice.

I don't recall getting upset at all about the public information. Instead, I politely requested that references to my children be removed. And they were!

Sure, you posted plenty on this board initially under a variety of pseudonyms. Most of us knew who you were, but you weren't openly posting without anonymity.

If I were you I wouldn't be advocating so fiercely against anonymity. It takes less than five minutes to find your complete contact information and bio online. Not everyone is comfortable with that; that doesn't necessarily make them a coward. It makes them prudent.

Yes, it is prudent to wear a mask while robbing a bank or raping somebody. Yes, is prudent to use a proxy server while stealing somebody's identity. Yes, it is prudent to write graffiti on your neighbor's house while he is sleeping. Yes, it is prudent to drive away quickly after hitting someone in a hit-and-run.

You just don't get it do you? You justify your mean-spirited, defamatory and hypocritical posts on the basis of your anonymity? Do you know the definition of sociopathy?
rcrocket

[_Runtu]

Bob,

I'm still curious as to why you couldn't verify the GA information. It took me less than 5 minutes.

[_the road to hana]

You just don't get it do you? You justify your mean-spirited, defamatory and hypocritical posts on the basis of your anonymity? Do you know the definition of sociopathy?

Someone who fudges his online resume and then lies about it?

[_rcrocket]

You just don't get it do you? You justify your mean-spirited, defamatory and hypocritical posts on the basis of your anonymity? Do you know the definition of sociopathy?

Someone who fudges his online resume and then lies about it?

Huh? What the hell are you talking about it? [Pretty easy to trash somebody's professional status anonymously isn't it? Such character you display.]

rcrocket

[_rcrocket]

Bob,

I'm still curious as to why you couldn't verify the GA information. It took me less than 5 minutes.

I'm still curious why you spend so much time on this board, why you post anonymously, and why your life at home is different than your life here?

[_beastie]

Hmm. As you recall, YOU were that stalker. And quite malicious, too. But, I have come to love and respect your brand of humorless malice.

I don't recall getting upset at all about the public information. Instead, I politely requested that references to my children be removed. And they were!

*I* was that stalker??? Why you worthless little piece of defecant, how DARE you insinuate that I stalked you and posted information about your children????

Yes, it is prudent to wear a mask while robbing a bank or raping somebody. Yes, is prudent to use a proxy server while stealing somebody's identity. Yes, it is prudent to write graffiti on your neighbor's house while he is sleeping. Yes, it is prudent to drive away quickly after hitting someone in a hit-and-run.

You just don't get it do you? You justify your mean-spirited, defamatory and hypocritical posts on the basis of your anonymity? Do you know the definition of sociopathy?

You just accused me of stalking you and posting information about your children on this site, which is a bald faced lie for which you could not possibly have the SMALLEST shred of proof, and you accuse me of making mean spirited defamatory hypocritical posts like a sociopath?

As I stated before, you're a worthless piece of defecant as far as I'm concerned.

[_rcrocket]

The second annointing thread explained one thing to me: An idiot posted anonymously and lacked the courage to state his name. The fact I couldn't get the general authorities' assignments to line up the way he described it suggests to me that he is, indeed, an idiot and a coward who will, quite naturally, burn in hell. Just a kind thought.

Hmmm. Harold Hillam was the Europe West Area President at the time. And according to the Friend, Wayne Peterson was a counselor in the Europe West Area in 2003.

Seems to me it's not that hard to line up the GAs' assignments the way the hell-burner said they did.

Oh yes. That is a good way to authenticate the raving of an anonymous poster. If somebody posted, using my name, and identified the fact that I had a son that went to Princeton, and said all sorts of things I wouldn't say -- but they got one fact right -- gee, you are going to roll over and believe every word? How gullible and non-discriminating you and your naïve friends are on this board.

My goodness -- isn't there any ability to sift and weigh evidence -- if it is against the church you accept it without question? Not one person challenged the possible provenance of this poster.

rcrocket

[_beastie]

My goodness -- isn't there any ability to sift and weigh evidence -- if it is against the church you accept it without question? Not one person challenged the possible provenance of this poster.

YOU lecture about sifting and weighing evidence??? And just accused me of stalking you and posting information about your children on this site, without one SHRED of evidence?

How do I know you have absolutely ZERO evidence???? Because I never stalked your worthless self and I would NEVER post information about people's children.

I shouldn't be surprised that a misogynist pr*ck like yourself would feel free to make baseless accusations, but I must admit, I am taken aback.

[_beastie]

And, by the way, I expect a retraction of that hateful, completely erroneous accusation.

[Analytics]

And, by the way, I expect a retraction of that hateful, completely erroneous accusation.

I think the key word is "demand" or "request" as I don't exactly expect a retraction to occur and I'm not so sure you think one will be forthcoming either. I would certainly be happy to be surprised here though.