rcrocket wrote: Heaven forbid he "finds himself". And how dare he break a few eggs while working on the Runtu omelette?
*rolleyes*
It's interesting that my therapist said the other day that she sees me on a journey of self-discovery and believes I've made excellent progress in "finding" myself.
rcrocket wrote:There was no "insinuation." I stated it clearly. You, my friend, are a stalker -- a malicious purveyor of personal information meant to hurt.
Where exactly did that come from?
(And why do beastie and Runtu seem to be the ones to catch so much flak? I mean good hell. Ther's quite a few posters who are alot more abrasive, overbearing, smartalecky, profane, etc etc than them (me included)....why do they catch so much flak? Seriously?)
I guess I am guilty of needling superhuge egos. Runtu just is inserting himself in middle of my attempt to fend off the attacks of my personal stalker.
rcrocket wrote: I guess I am guilty of needling superhuge egos. Runtu just is inserting himself in middle of my attempt to fend off the attacks of my personal stalker.
rcrocket
For what it's worth, I couldn't care less about your feud with beastie. My interest was simply in why you found it so difficult to verify certain aspects of the guy's story. I have no idea whether this guy's account is genuine, and I'm not all that excited about it. But the GA details do check out.
rcrocket wrote: I guess I am guilty of needling superhuge egos. Runtu just is inserting himself in middle of my attempt to fend off the attacks of my personal stalker.
rcrocket
For what it's worth, I couldn't care less about your feud with beastie. My interest was simply in why you found it so difficult to verify certain aspects of the guy's story. I have no idea whether this guy's account is genuine, and I'm not all that excited about it. But the GA details do check out.
And so, because an anonymous post has one fact correct, you accept it. Life is wonderful, isn't it? You can pick what you want to believe no matter how frivolous, irresponsible and anonymous? There is no discrimination of evidence in your mind except, of course, if denigrates the faith of your fathers and those who sacrificed their all the bring you to this point in your life.
Last edited by _rcrocket on Sat Jan 26, 2008 6:12 am, edited 1 time in total.
rcrocket wrote: And so, because an anonymous post has one fact correct, you accept it. Life is wonderful, isn't it? You can pick what you want to believe no matter how frivolous, irresponsible and anonymous? There is no discrimination of evidence in your mind except, of course, if it supports to faith of your fathers and those who sacrificed their all the bring you to this point in your life.
I just got through telling you that I don't necessarily "accept" it as true. Maybe you see what you want to see in my posts. I don't know.
rcrocket wrote:Make sure that you continue, like Beastie, to secure your little self-made victories along the path of disingenuity and denial of the Cross.
beastie wrote:You do realize that Jesus is watching you lie, don't you? And angels are taking notes? And this will all be played out on some big movie screen in the sky one day?
That reminds me, if someone had his calling and election made sure would he have to worry about angels taking notes?
note: this is not a post about rcrocket. It is a post about 2nd annointings and behavior--the topic of this thread.
That's General Leo. He could be my friend if he weren't my enemy. eritis sicut dii I support NCMO
beastie wrote:You do realize that Jesus is watching you lie, don't you? And angels are taking notes? And this will all be played out on some big movie screen in the sky one day?
That reminds me, if someone had his calling and election made sure would he have to worry about angels taking notes?
note: this is not a post about rcrocket. It is a post about 2nd annointings and behavior--the topic of this thread.
I think it must mean that the angels cut you loose because you've already "made" it.
(And why do beastie and Runtu seem to be the ones to catch so much flak? I mean good hell. Ther's quite a few posters who are alot more abrasive, overbearing, smartalecky, profane, etc etc than them (me included)....why do they catch so much flak? Seriously?)
Because they are intelligent, smart, reasonable people who know their stuff and can debate well.