Non-Memorial Comments Regarding President Hinckley

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_MishMagnet
_Emeritus
Posts: 288
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 2:04 pm

Post by _MishMagnet »

I don't see the man as a villian and I find it in extremely poor taste to be so flippant about a fellow beings passing.
Insert ironic quote from fellow board member here.
_Some Schmo
_Emeritus
Posts: 15602
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 2:59 pm

Post by _Some Schmo »

Well, the Mormons should be happy for him. He finally gets a chance to talk to god.

I'll never understand why religious folks would be upset about someone passing (at least, not for that person - understandable for the person's family). It's heaven time for them now, isn't it?
God belief is for people who don't want to live life on the universe's terms.
_RAJ
_Emeritus
Posts: 126
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 3:26 pm

Post by _RAJ »

Maxrep wrote:
Boaz & Lidia wrote:I dunno how long he will last as he has been a diabetic for many years.



Interesting you should mention that! I was unaware of his diabetic condition, but suspected it. In a recent BYU commencement activity photo, his face was somewhat swollen from water retention, and through his socks, the ankles were visibly swollen too. that's a tough condition to deal with in the advanced years for sure.


Hopefully he'll last long enough to prevent Packer from ever becoming President. That would be a real contribution to the Mormon organization.
_guy sajer
_Emeritus
Posts: 1372
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 2:16 am

Post by _guy sajer »

Frankly, I almost couldn't care less. The only significance Hinkley has for me is that he heads a Church I once belonged to and to which certain of my loved ones belong. As far as I'm concerned, he's no different than the thousands of other people who died today and for whom I also feel nothing, no because I'm callous, but because, like most people, I don't take it hard when people totally uconnected to my life pass on. It happens every day to millions of people. I don't have the emotional energy to get worked up about everyone who passes on.

As far as I'm concerned, Hinkley was a nice old man, but a seriously deluded one. He was the CEO of a large corporation that I believe to be a fraudulent and, on balance, harmful one. I feel no more sadness at Hinkley's passing that I did when Ken Lay passed on to his eternal reward. And why should I?

I'm not happy in any way at his passing, but neither am I sad. Goodbye Gordo, and I hope for all of us that you've found that there is something after this life, and if there is, I hope you're not too disappointed to find out that you devoted your long life to a fraud.
God . . . "who mouths morals to other people and has none himself; who frowns upon crimes, yet commits them all; who created man without invitation, . . . and finally, with altogether divine obtuseness, invites this poor, abused slave to worship him ..."
_Mister Scratch
_Emeritus
Posts: 5604
Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 8:13 pm

Post by _Mister Scratch »

President Hinckley---RIP.

What are my thoughts on his passing? In the end, I think that it is hard to imagine a better man to have led the LDS Church into the 21st century. The years during his presidency saw the ascendancy of the Internet, and even now, the Church hierarchy continues to face a crisis of information control. Pres. Hinckley was perhaps the most P.R.-savvy leader the Church has ever had. Of course, this led him into some sticky terrain, such as his infamous "I don't know that we teach that" gaffe, and his spin during the dedication of the MMM memorial. But ultimately, these failings don't reflect badly on him per se so much as they point the way to endemic problems within the Church---problems of information control and image which even Pres. Hinckley could not surpass.

It will be interesting to see what direction the Church takes from here. I know that Monson suffers from diabetes, and that he's not likely to live much longer. The key question, it seems to me, is whether BKP will ever get a shot at the presidency.
_Dr. Shades
_Emeritus
Posts: 14117
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:07 pm

Post by _Dr. Shades »

Jason Bourne wrote:Do I think that some of the details that we all struggle and complain about should be more openly presented? Yes. Do I understand how difficult a balance the Church leaders have in this area? Yes. It is not a simple thing.


Actually, it is a simple thing. What could possibly be a better course of action than telling the truth?
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"

--Louis Midgley
_harmony
_Emeritus
Posts: 18195
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am

Post by _harmony »

Mister Scratch wrote:It will be interesting to see what direction the Church takes from here. I know that Monson suffers from diabetes, and that he's not likely to live much longer. The key question, it seems to me, is whether BKP will ever get a shot at the presidency.


If TSM goes quickly, I hope BKP goes even more quickly. Although the idea of Oaks having a shot at the president's chair fills me with as dread as Packer.
_LCD2YOU
_Emeritus
Posts: 175
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 10:30 pm

Post by _LCD2YOU »

Boaz & Lidia wrote:
harmony wrote:It is a sad day for all members of the church as well. He was beloved and with good cause. Sad, indeed.
Why is it sad? He was 97 for cripes sakes!

Were people hoping for 10 more years?

Were there some things he did not complete? Besides the Mega Mo'mall.
In these immortal words of John Donne, "No man is an island unto himself, so do not ask for whom the bell tolls, it tolls for thee"

Perhaps you should rethink your tactics and how you bring up certain topics.

Or is it just me?
Knowledge is Power
Power Corrupts
Study Hard and
Become EVIL!
_Rollo Tomasi
_Emeritus
Posts: 4085
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 12:27 pm

Post by _Rollo Tomasi »

harmony wrote:It is a sad day for all members of the church as well.

My thoughts on GBH's passing, for what they're worth:

I thought he was a good man and was sad at his passing (although he had a very long and fulfilling life). I think he's been the most influential LDS "president" (I put that in quotes because I believe he effectively ran the Church for over 25 years, such as when he was a counselor to feeble superiors in the FP) in over a century. I think he was also the most candid president in a very long time. Although I liked his efforts in reaching out to others not of the LDS faith, I also recognize his leadership in guiding the Church to greater homophobia (i.e., Proclamation, support of constitutional amendment against gay marriage, etc.). I think he truly had a testimony of the LDS gospel, but I also believe he was more aware than most of the many troubling issues in LDS history (which he simply pushed aside, or outright tried to conceal. All in all, I think he led an incredible life and did many good things (despite many mistakes, but none of us avoids that).
"Moving beyond apologist persuasion, LDS polemicists furiously (and often fraudulently) attack any non-traditional view of Mormonism. They don't mince words -- they mince the truth."

-- Mike Quinn, writing of the FARMSboys, in "Early Mormonism and the Magic World View," p. x (Rev. ed. 1998)
_karl61
_Emeritus
Posts: 2983
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 6:29 pm

Post by _karl61 »

155,000 people die each day - he was one of them.
I want to fly!
Post Reply