2nd annointings and Elder Packer - does it explain anything?

[_rcrocket]

Beastie/Trixie not my stalker? Well, I cited to the email [edited: should say "post"; see above where that link was provided] where she did so. What more do I need?

Me falsifying my resume? Really precious! Where's the proof? I think if you'll check my resume you'll agree that I have no need to do so.

Carry on.

rcrocket

[_Mister Scratch]

Beastie/Trixie not my stalker? Well, I cited to the email where she did so. What more do I need?

Me falsifying my resume? Really precious! Where's the proof? I think if you'll check my resume you'll agree that I have no need to do so.

Carry on.

rcrocket

What email? Go ahead and post it, Bob.

[_rcrocket]

Beastie/Trixie not my stalker? Well, I cited to the email where she did so. What more do I need?

Me falsifying my resume? Really precious! Where's the proof? I think if you'll check my resume you'll agree that I have no need to do so.

Carry on.

rcrocket

What email? Go ahead and post it, Bob.

Sorry; I meant the "post" not the "email."

rcrocket

[_Mister Scratch]

Beastie/Trixie not my stalker? Well, I cited to the email where she did so. What more do I need?

Me falsifying my resume? Really precious! Where's the proof? I think if you'll check my resume you'll agree that I have no need to do so.

Carry on.

rcrocket

What email? Go ahead and post it, Bob.

Sorry; I meant the "post" not the "email."

rcrocket

You "cited the [post] where she [stalked you]"? What, is this supposed to constitute evidence of some kind, counselor? I'd be interested in seeing the "post" where Beastie "stalked" you. Feel free to re-post it.

by the way: Did you or did you not graduate summa cum laude from BYU?

[_rcrocket]

Beastie/Trixie not my stalker? Well, I cited to the email where she did so. What more do I need?

Me falsifying my resume? Really precious! Where's the proof? I think if you'll check my resume you'll agree that I have no need to do so.

Carry on.

rcrocket

What email? Go ahead and post it, Bob.

Sorry; I meant the "post" not the "email."

rcrocket

You "cited the [post] where she [stalked you]"? What, is this supposed to constitute evidence of some kind, counselor? I'd be interested in seeing the "post" where Beastie "stalked" you. Feel free to re-post it.

by the way: Did you or did you not graduate summa cum laude from BYU?

Feel free to look at my post above where I discuss this. I suppose that the definition of "stalk" is subjective. You'll think that malice and slander and vulgar unrelated attacks and references to my kids and my wife, and intimate relations with my wife (repeatedly asserted) are nothing; I think it is stalking.

My resume is on-line. It has been referenced many times. You can see for yourself what I am and what I have done. I would frankly like Road to Hell simply state with more specificity what he is talking about and provide proof.

rcrocket

[_the road to hana]

My resume is on-line. It has been referenced many times. You can see for yourself what I am and what I have done. I would frankly like Road to Hell simply state with more specificity what he is talking about and provide proof.

rcrocket

Your memory isn't that bad. In the previous incarnation of this board, I read your online bio and asked you if you really graduated summa cum laude from BYU, as you claimed.

You responded that was an error (typo, I think you claimed), and changed it.

We could always check with your secretary.

So, one of two things is possible--either you are extremely forgetful, which I find unlikely, or you're dissembling.

You admitted to changing it on this board, and completely minimized it at the time.

By the way, Bishop Crockett, it only takes two more clicks to find that you're bishop of the _________ Ward, your office phone number there, the fact that your Sacrament Meeting starts at 1:00 p.m., and that you have a Stake Temple Night on Feb. 2nd.

With all the information you have available to the public online, I can't imagine why you're advocating against Internet anonymity.

[_harmony]

I would frankly like Road to Hell simply state with more specificity what he is talking about and provide proof.

rcrocket

Oh, now there you go again, losing that Christ-like glow and embracing instead the condemnatory countenance of the damned.

It's not Road to Hell, and you owe the road to hana an apology. Tsk tsk.

[_beastie]

You "cited the [post] where she [stalked you]"? What, is this supposed to constitute evidence of some kind, counselor? I'd be interested in seeing the "post" where Beastie "stalked" you. Feel free to re-post it.

by the way: Did you or did you not graduate summa cum laude from BYU?

First, let me provide the necessary context.

Lawyer bob, as is his wont, posted the following:

The second annointing thread explained one thing to me: An idiot posted anonymously and lacked the courage to state his name. The fact I couldn't get the general authorities' assignments to line up the way he described it suggests to me that he is, indeed, an idiot and a coward who will, quite naturally, burn in hell. Just a kind thought.

And I responded:

First, let me say that we're all so pleased that you're actually offering input other than your normal "one note johnnie" song.

Oh wait....

Second, the poster gave enough personal details that the leaders would immediately be able to know who he was. So his anonymity was not designed to protect his identity from church leaders. It was designed to protect his family.

I understand that, to you, protecting one's family via internet anonymity is an act of cowardice, but we're not all quite as noble as you.

My bolded words clearly referenced the fact that personal information about bob's family was posted by someone who tracked down the information using bob's real name.

Other posters clearly followed this train of thought as well:

hana:

Good God, crockett, you've posted anonymously here often enough, and go ballistic when people post your in real life information.

pokatator:

Crocket,

was stupid enough to post his real name and that is the only horn he has to toot is trying to get everyone else to be as stupid as he is and was.

bob followed up:

That is simply untrue. When I post with a pseudonym I always give my true name out in one of my posts or in my profile.

There have been minor exceptions -- ten posts or less on some boards. I have been known to make an anonymous post to poke fun at one of my own posts -- but nobody's perfect.

The simple fact remains that you all are getting all jazzed and excited about an anonymous post. He's a coward. You are a coward. And, no, I don't post with my own name because I made some mistake in doing so some time ago. I have posted with my own name since the days of BBS echo boards.

I responded:

And how noble that makes you!!

I'm sure your family members were equally appreciative when their personal information was posted by an internet stalker.

Although this is repetitive, I felt it important to provide the background context to make it clear that the topic was that bob's family's personal information had been exposed by an internet stalker on this board. So bob responded:

Hmm. As you recall, YOU were that stalker. And quite malicious, too. But, I have come to love and respect your brand of humorless malice.

I don't recall getting upset at all about the public information. Instead, I politely requested that references to my children be removed. And they were!

Now it's obvious bob is also talking about the post that revealed personal information about his family. It could not be more clear THIS is what he's referencing and named ME as that stalker.

The irony is, after accusing me of being the internet stalker who revealed personal information about his family and children, bob said this to me:

Yes, it is prudent to wear a mask while robbing a bank or raping somebody. Yes, is prudent to use a proxy server while stealing somebody's identity. Yes, it is prudent to write graffiti on your neighbor's house while he is sleeping. Yes, it is prudent to drive away quickly after hitting someone in a hit-and-run.

You just don't get it do you? You justify your mean-spirited, defamatory and hypocritical posts on the basis of your anonymity? Do you know the definition of sociopathy?

Funny, this isn't the first time bob has accused me of being a "sociopath."

After repeated challenges, this is what "lawyer bob" offered as evidence:

Beastie, forgive me if I misinterpreted your attacks on my children and wife at http://www.mormondiscussions.com/discus ... postorder=
asc&highlight=misogynist&start=0 as stalking. I am sure you are a nice person.

And this is the post of mine he linked:

I just want to make sure every poster on this board realizes that crocket has insulted scratch by repeatedly calling him a woman.

I'm making a formal announcement: this guy is a misogynist arsehole and from now on I will treat him even worse than our roughest posters ever dreamed of.

http://mormondiscussions.com/discuss/vi ... 4&start=84

One of his statements:

Quote:
Yes, Ms. Scratch. You hit the nail on the head.



I responded:

Quote:
I hope your daughters read what you write here so they can understand that their father thinks a good way to belittle and demean a man is to call him a woman.



He answered:

Quote:
I have reason to believe Scratch is a female posing as a male. How is that demeaning?



I pulled this out of the thread in question just in case any readers weren't following the thread. I want everyone to know this guy is a misogynist arsehole.

Hey, bob, it's a miracle you have seven kids. I guess that means your wife laid back and thought of England seven times. God knows I'd never let a misogynist touch me.

And he reaffirmed his assertion that this made me a "stalker"

bob

There was no "insinuation." I stated it clearly. You, my friend, are a stalker -- a malicious purveyor of personal information meant to hurt.

"lawyer bob" clearly lied in that he accused ME of being the one who revealed personal information about his family. The only personal information I mentioned had already been revealed - that he has a wife and seven kids. The only "information" I "revealed" in this post was that his wife laid back and thought of England in order to endure sex with bob, a misogynist.

The problem is that I didn't realize I was revealing personal information about bob's wife with this statement. I really, really, did not know that she laid back and thought of england in order to endure sex with misogynist lawyer bob. I was just making a bad joke. a mean joke. Had I known that bob's wife really DID lay back and think of england in order to endure sex with bob, then I would realize that he would think I was revealing personal information in order to hurt him. I promise that I did not obtain this information somehow by "stalking" bob and his wife. I do not know bob's wife, I do not know anyone else who knows bob's wife who could have conveyed this information to me. It seems bob suspects his wife has shared this information with someone else, hence, allowing me to "stalk" and find it out, but really, it was just a lucky guess.

Now, if bob doesn't really think that his wife laying back and thinking of england was personal information I obtained through "stalking", and knows that this wasn't meant to convey real information about his family at all, then he is deliberately lying in order to slander me. And has no guilty conscience about doing so. Hmmm, now, what psychological disorder does THAT sound like?

[_the road to hana]

I would frankly like Road to Hell simply state with more specificity what he is talking about and provide proof.

rcrocket

Oh, now there you go again, losing that Christ-like glow and embracing instead the condemnatory countenance of the damned.

It's not Road to Hell, and you owe the road to hana an apology. Tsk tsk.

I'm sure Bob's had a difficult past few days, what with being a busy Bishop of a Southern California ward, and then losing President Hinckley last night. No doubt he posts on this board for a release, instead of playing video games or surfing porn.

He's also no doubt annoyed that that much in real life information is that readily available on him.

[_beastie]

by the way, after I calmed down, I did view my joke as being in bad taste, and on the same thread linked above stated:

by the way, I do regret making the comment about bob's wife thinking about England. That was said in a moment of anger. I apologize to bob for that, but not for the rest of my observations about the "Ms. Scratch" incident.