liz3564 wrote:Schmo wrote:It appears that essentially what you're saying here is that people need religion (some... any form of religion, as long as they choose it themselves). That's just not the case, anymore than a heroin addict needs heroin or a rich guy needs a luxury car.
No. What I was saying was that as a parent, for my children, I feel that religion is valuable. I specifically said that not everyone NEEDS religion, that it is an individual choice. What has worked best for my situation, and as a steward for my family, something I get to decide, is that religion works well for my family.
Come on, liz. You didn't specifically say that not everyone NEEDS religion. You said that "you respect the fact that you do not see value for religion in your own life, and for your children's lives" but before that you said, "I think it is
important for children to be aware, and to be exposed to different religions, and how much they effect society at large" and after, you also said "I, however, do see value for religion in my children's lives.
I think it's important, however, that religion is presented in a way that they are truly capable of choosing for themselves what is going to be the most fulfilling path for them." (bolding mine) This implies that religion is needed in order to teach kids "what is going to be the most fulfilling path for them." It doesn't sound like that path has room for no religion.
I question how you can respect someone's decision to leave religion out of the equation after the claims you just made.
Please answer my question: what value do you and your family get from religion that you couldn't get by not going? Is this an uncomfortable question for you?
God belief is for people who don't want to live life on the universe's terms.