FAIR releases online videos

[_dartagnan]

You really need to access the following and include it in your article beastie:

http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0031-2746(198108)92%3C3%3ANHAH%3E2.0.CO%3B2-I

[_CaliforniaKid]

Yeah, I was thinking about whether or not I have it placed well. That's why I'm waiting until I have all my changes in place before actually posting it online.

Speaking of design, someone earlier suggested that I fix the names of the pages so when they come up the name isn't always "page one". I can't figure out how to do it. I'm using frontpage, if anyone has advice.

There should be something in the page properties or something like that that says "page title". Alternatively, in the "head" section of your HTML you should see something like this:

<TITLE>Page One</TITLE>

Just change the text inside the tags.

Good luck,

-Chris

[_skippy the dead]

Speaking of design, someone earlier suggested that I fix the names of the pages so when they come up the name isn't always "page one". I can't figure out how to do it. I'm using frontpage, if anyone has advice.

That was me. I'm not familiar with Frontpage. When you view the page source, here's what that part looks like:

Code: Select all

<title>New Page 1</title>

By the power of google, here's what Mr. Microsoft says to do (link: http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/front ... 61033.aspx):

The title of a page is the name that appears in the title bar of most Web browsers, page banners, and link bars.

The title can be different from the file name. For example, the title of your home page could be "My home page" even though the file name is "Default.htm."

1. In any view except Tasks or Reports, open the Folder List.

ShowHow?
On the View menu, click Folder List.
2. On the Folder List, right-click the Web page file, click Properties, and then click the General tab.
3. In the Title box, type the title that you want.

Note The title you choose also appears in the page banners and link bars that Microsoft Office FrontPage 2003 creates.

Hope this helps.

[_beastie]

Kevin,

That does look like an excellent article, but I don't have access to jstor.

Chris,

Thanks, I found it! It's obvious I don't really understand what I'm doing in website design.

[_CaliforniaKid]

Chris,

Thanks, I found it! It's obvious I don't really understand what I'm doing in website design.

Practice makes perfect. :-)

[_beastie]

Thanks, skippy, that works, too. Hopefully I'll have time today to get all this updated. For now I'm going to leave the hun horse where it is and figure out later if I need to subdivide it.

[_beastie]

I got it fixed! The page title should now show up as the name of the page. I also updated the horse page with this new information. I realize that there's a lot of information on that page and may have to eventually subdivide it. I can only take so much of working on it before I need a break.

[_CaliforniaKid]

I will make the Spencer Lake horse skull reference available in a day or two.

[_beastie]

Thanks, Chris - I forgot all about that one!

[_ludwigm]

News (I didn't finished the search ... )

I have found the author: Bökönyi Sándor archeozoologist 1926-1994
I have found many writings from him but not the cited one.
I will try to obtain the book, Sándor Bökönyi, History of Domestic Mammals in Central and Eastern Europe, trans. Lili Halápy (Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó, 1974), 267.
Google gives hundreds hits, this book and many other of his books are much called for in second-hand bookshops.

But here is something which can help.

The huns conquered Hungary (it was Pannonia then) in 533. Attila dead in 553 and the hun power dissolved. This is twenty year of Hun occupation.
From this period, a very short one for ancient history, we have two two rich hun burying, one warrior with horse and a high-born girl, from Keszthely, at lake Balaton. This site, as a history of the town, doesn't say anything about the date of the finding. It may have been after 1974. I will check it.

The other many hundred grave with horses in Hungary are sarmata, scythian, yazig(I don't know the english name), avar, and last but not least hungarian. They (=we) were very similar in the relation to horses. Robes, weapons was the same kind, the jewellery many times are of same origin (smiley). For the archeology it was a hard task to identify correctly. But to say "not a single usable horse bone has been found in the territory of the whole empire of the Huns" is a simple lie. As above, only in Hungary (You know - or don't know - we are a small country), only in that twenty years, there was two well defined finding.