Moniker wrote:Bond, since the thread is about vacuity is it possible to derail it?
I clicked on weblog news to go to your latest entry and it doesn't show. If it's set to friends only does it show up on the weblog news?
Friends only entries don't show up on the "weblog news" thing. So you have to click on my blog at the bottom of the board index in order to get access to my protected entries.
Yah, I just entered your blog the standard way. But, I tried the weblog news thing first and noticed the entry wasn't there. I'd never noticed that before. Duh.
Of course, there's always Schmo, Merc, Harmony, Kimberly, and Boaz and Lydia et al. The barbarians in the intellectual crib but never actually at the gates.
I think about the loveless fascination, under the Milty Way tonight.
Yes, I'm under it. Even the exmos are under it.
Yes, even good time rock n' roll, maggot infested, plastic banana, NPR listening, Oprah worshiping, Girls Gone Wild watching, Bible burning, Whore mongering, erring wearing, tattoo flaunting, nipple clamp loving, pot smoking, glue sniffing, Acid dropping, Democrat voting, commie pinko liberals are under it.
Day of judgment God is calling... On they're knees the exmos crawling...
Heeeeeeeeeeeeers Johnny!
Coggy, im worried. Call your sponsor now so you can get sober again.
Please. Do it for your wife.
And crawling on the planet's face Some insects called the human race Lost in time And lost in space...and meaning
Of course, there's always Schmo, Merc, Harmony, Kimberly, and Boaz and Lydia et al. The barbarians in the intellectual crib but never actually at the gates.
I think about the loveless fascination, under the Milty Way tonight.
Yes, I'm under it. Even the exmos are under it.
Yes, even good time rock n' roll, maggot infested, plastic banana, NPR listening, Oprah worshiping, Girls Gone Wild watching, Bible burning, Whore mongering, erring wearing, tattoo flaunting, nipple clamp loving, pot smoking, glue sniffing, Acid dropping, Democrat voting, commie pinko liberals are under it.
Day of judgment God is calling... On they're knees the exmos crawling...
Heeeeeeeeeeeeers Johnny!
Loran,
I seriously want to know why you do this to yourself. It looks like you think you're getting over on people around here but don't you know that it will only result in a wave of mockery directed back to yourself? You have almost 3,000 posts on this vacuous board. Pot-kettle-black, sir.
Moniker wrote:Yanno, I had to read your comment, look at his, read yours again before it dawned on me that it could be construed sexually. Hmm......
I'd rather not touch anything on these boards with absurd sexual innuendos. I leave that for others.
That's cause my post made sense....linking "protected entries" to a blog makes sense. Now If I'd said...."let me have access to your protected materials" or "you'll have to ask nicely if you want access to my protected materials" then it would be sexual innuendo.
"Whatever appears to be against the Book of Mormon is going to be overturned at some time in the future. So we can be pretty open minded."-charity 3/7/07
Moniker wrote:Yanno, I had to read your comment, look at his, read yours again before it dawned on me that it could be construed sexually. Hmm......
I'd rather not touch anything on these boards with absurd sexual innuendos. I leave that for others.
That's cause my post made sense....linking "protected entries" to a blog makes sense. Now If I'd said...."let me have access to your protected materials" or "you'll have to ask nicely if you want access to my protected materials" then it would be sexual innuendo.
Ah! Okay... even then you might have to repeat it a few times for me...
See, now, I'm trying to think of an innuendo to retort with and nada -- total blank! :D I so don't do good with innuendos. I'm more of a blunt nipple clamper type a girl! Entries? No. S&M -- I get that!
Moniker wrote:Yanno, I had to read your comment, look at his, read yours again before it dawned on me that it could be construed sexually. Hmm......
I'd rather not touch anything on these boards with absurd sexual innuendos. I leave that for others.
That's cause my post made sense....linking "protected entries" to a blog makes sense. Now If I'd said...."let me have access to your protected materials" or "you'll have to ask nicely if you want access to my protected materials" then it would be sexual innuendo.
Profuse apologies! I was temporarily warped by the drive-by OP.