Mormon Replacement Rate

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_beastie
_Emeritus
Posts: 14216
Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 2:26 am

Mormon Replacement Rate

Post by _beastie »

This article was linked from postmo:

http://latterdaymainstreet.com/?p=263


According to the Pew U.S. Religious Landscape Survey the replacement rate of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints has dropped to 80%. That means that for every five members who leave Mormonism behind four new converts join the Church.

In 2001, the CUNY Religious Identification Survey had found that Mormons, as well as Jehavah’s Witnesses, recruited large numbers of converts but lost members at the same rates. If the Pew Forum’s findings are correct then the LDS Church is no longer replacing its losses in the United States.

The Pew Forum surveyed 35,000 respondents, which is a magnificent asset for religion researchers because even relatively small religions will be represented with sufficiently large sub-samples yielding reasonable margins of error. The U.S. Religious Landscape Survey found that 1.7% of adult Americans are Mormon, which means that the sample contains 595 Mormons.

A random stratified sample of 512 respondents would yield a margin of error of +/-4%.

In this sample, the Pew researchers found that about 162 respondents had left Mormonism but only 132 had joined, which yields a deficit of 33 people (~5.5%). I am not sure but in the absence of information to the contrary, I am assuming that joining and leaving Mormonism applies to the life time of the respondents. Even so, that figure amounts to a substantial deficit.

Just for fun, lets consider the best and worst case scenarios in light of the samples margin of error. In the best case, which assumes the lowest possible number of departers and the highest possible number of converts, the Mormon replacement rate might exceed 1.1. That would mean that eleven members join for every ten that leave.

On the other hand, the worst case scenario would depress the replacement rate to less than 58% where less than six people would convert for every ten departures.

However, the mean departure rate of 80% is most likely the correct estimate. If that number were correct, and that is what the evidence says, it would indicate a substantial demographic challenge for LDS leaders and the Mormon community.

PS: This is a self-identification survey. Respondents will reveal their views of themselves, which means that there will be any number of people who will say that they are no longer Mormons but have not mailed a resignation letter to Salt Lake.


Does anyone know about this? Is the article accurate?
We hate to seem like we don’t trust every nut with a story, but there’s evidence we can point to, and dance while shouting taunting phrases.

Penn & Teller

http://www.mormonmesoamerica.com
_Mike Reed
_Emeritus
Posts: 983
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2007 7:28 pm

Post by _Mike Reed »

I don't know if it is accurate, but the article seems to overlook membership that comes via child-birth.
_Bond...James Bond
_Emeritus
Posts: 4627
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 4:49 am

Post by _Bond...James Bond »

Mike Reed wrote:I don't know if it is accurate, but the article seems to overlook membership that comes via child-birth.


Which is why they want to pound the issue of having kids, that's the only church growth when one person leaves for every person who joins.

Of course what about the people who die?

Does this formula look correct?

(Deaths+Church resignations)-(births+conversions)=Church growth or church loss
"Whatever appears to be against the Book of Mormon is going to be overturned at some time in the future. So we can be pretty open minded."-charity 3/7/07
_Boaz & Lidia
_Emeritus
Posts: 1416
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 8:31 am

Post by _Boaz & Lidia »

Bond...James Bond wrote:
Mike Reed wrote:I don't know if it is accurate, but the article seems to overlook membership that comes via child-birth.


Which is why they want to pound the issue of having kids, that's the only church growth when one person leaves for every person who joins.

Of course what about the people who die?

Does this formula look correct?

(Deaths+Church resignations)-(births+conversions)=Church growth or church loss
Rephrased:

(Registered Deaths of active members + actual requested resignations )- (BIC baptisms + people who have been baptized) = LDS growth or loss

Also, all child baptisms from age of nine and above are counted as a convert baptism, cuz yanno, 9 year old have adult like cognitive and reasoning skills and truly were converted rather than being forced like the parent pleasing parroting eight year olds nailed in the stake center dunk tank.

Remember their records department do not remove names unless one of the following occurs(in order):
1. Someone tells them there is a dead LDS member.
2. Official name removal request(although I have serious doubts they actually remove them from the count)
3. The date of birth on record places them at 110+ years old and they cannot contact them

Also keep in mind, LDS Inc counts both conversions and baptisms as the same. Any honest clergy does not(very rare in LDS wards).
_ludwigm
_Emeritus
Posts: 10158
Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2007 8:07 am

Post by _ludwigm »

And why do every 4 of 5 leave?

In another thread, charity has explained it :
charity wrote:
ludwigm wrote:The modern audience will not listen the message without material proof. The majority of them.
The minority? Yes, there are millions who accept it after six half-hour lesson. What do You think, why do 80% of them leave in the first year? No, they are not sinners, they are not offended. Simply they look behind the show-window and see those unimportant things.
The Book of Mormon is about the message of the Gospel. It isn't a geography book. People should be joining the Church because the Holy Spirit testifies to them of the truth of the Gospel of Christ. Not for any other reason. If they have that witness and join why do they leave? Because some people join for the wrong reasons. Because it takes work and effort to maintain a a testimony, and some people lose theirs. Because some sin. Because some become offended. Because some can't leave the pride of the world. Lots of reasons. And none of them have anything to do with where a physical location of a Book of Mormon site is.


All of them have leaved because they was wrong. The persons. The members. The individuals.

No other reason.

The church is true.

QED
- Whenever a poet or preacher, chief or wizard spouts gibberish, the human race spends centuries deciphering the message. - Umberto Eco
- To assert that the earth revolves around the sun is as erroneous as to claim that Jesus was not born of a virgin. - Cardinal Bellarmine at the trial of Galilei
_It occurs to me . . .
_Emeritus
Posts: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 6:06 am

Post by _It occurs to me . . . »

I'm pretty sure that the guy who wrote the article, Hellmut, is the same who posts under that name on MAD, he is also the onw who runs The Cumorah Project: http://www.cumorah.com/ , a great site for Mormon growth stats.

At least I think it's the same guy.
_beastie
_Emeritus
Posts: 14216
Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 2:26 am

Post by _beastie »

Yes, it doesn't appear to include birth/baptism at 8, as replacement rate. Given the high birth rate among Mormons, that probably still results in the LDS church growing, rather than shrinking.

Thanks, for the link, occurs to me - I'll check it out and see if he addresses birth rate somewhere.



If they have that witness and join why do they leave? Because some people join for the wrong reasons. Because it takes work and effort to maintain a a testimony, and some people lose theirs. Because some sin. Because some become offended. Because some can't leave the pride of the world. Lots of reasons. And none of them have anything to do with where a physical location of a Book of Mormon site is.


Lots of reasons = discovering the overwhelming evidence against various church claims
We hate to seem like we don’t trust every nut with a story, but there’s evidence we can point to, and dance while shouting taunting phrases.

Penn & Teller

http://www.mormonmesoamerica.com
_SatanWasSetUp
_Emeritus
Posts: 1183
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 2:40 pm

Post by _SatanWasSetUp »

Charity said:
it takes work and effort to maintain a a testimony.


I agree with Charity on this. Why do you think that is? If something is so obviously true, even the one and only truth, why is it so hard? And do you think it is harder to maintain a testimony if you're a Mormon as opposed to say the Jehovah's Witnesses? They both have about the same resignation rates.
"We of this Church do not rely on any man-made statement concerning the nature of Deity. Our knowledge comes directly from the personal experience of Joseph Smith." - Gordon B. Hinckley

"It's wrong to criticize leaders of the Mormon Church even if the criticism is true." - Dallin H. Oaks
_John Larsen
_Emeritus
Posts: 1895
Joined: Fri Jan 12, 2007 7:16 pm

Post by _John Larsen »

SatanWasSetUp wrote:Charity said:
it takes work and effort to maintain a a testimony.


I agree with Charity on this. Why do you think that is? If something is so obviously true, even the one and only truth, why is it so hard? And do you think it is harder to maintain a testimony if you're a Mormon as opposed to say the Jehovah's Witnesses? They both have about the same resignation rates.


I also agree. However, I don't think it take ongoing effort to maintain a belief in things that are clearly true.
_Mercury
_Emeritus
Posts: 5545
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 2:14 pm

Post by _Mercury »

John Larsen wrote:
SatanWasSetUp wrote:Charity said:
it takes work and effort to maintain a a testimony.


I agree with Charity on this. Why do you think that is? If something is so obviously true, even the one and only truth, why is it so hard? And do you think it is harder to maintain a testimony if you're a Mormon as opposed to say the Jehovah's Witnesses? They both have about the same resignation rates.


I also agree. However, I don't think it take ongoing effort to maintain a belief in things that are clearly true.


Agreed.

If I were to use charity's logic I need to study up and reaffirm gravity, Moores law and base 2 mathematics. If I were to lose my testimony in these truths I don't know WHAT i would do.

/sarcasm
And crawling on the planet's face
Some insects called the human race
Lost in time
And lost in space...and meaning
Post Reply