MAD's "Great LDS Intellectuals" Thread

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_Mister Scratch
_Emeritus
Posts: 5604
Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 8:13 pm

MAD's "Great LDS Intellectuals" Thread

Post by _Mister Scratch »

Has anyone else read this laff-fest? I can't decide whether the thread is uproariously funny, or if it is a tragic embarrassment. The thread was begun by "Lamanite", who lists these folks in his "1st Presidency" of LDS Intellectuals:

President: Richard Bushman
1st Counselor: Leonard Arrington
2nd Counselor: Eugene England


The thread continues, and what's striking is how many GAs are listed as "intellectuals." Aren't these men supposed to be admired primarily for their spiritual gifts, rather than their (to paraphrase BKP) "so-called" intellectualism? (Further, some of these selections seem like a stretch. I mean, John Taylor? Come on, now.) Joseph Smith and BY each get multiple mentions, as does GBH. The poster called "Thinking" had this provocative observation:

Thinking wrote:Is it possible that the greatest Mormon intellects are not LDS anymore?


Others included BH Roberts, Hugh Nibley, and (ulp...) Lou Midgley. What's noticeable is the remarkable absence of women from the list (Calmoriah included her mother, and Lamanite said, later in the thread, "Ann Madsen.") Check out this classic from Hammer:

I would add the Holy Ghost and Jesus Christ.


The Holy Ghost and Jesus are among the greatest Mormon intellectuals of all time. Yes; I'd be interested in reading Prof. Christ's doctoral dissertation.

Anyways, what a bizarre thread! One wonders just how, exactly, these folks are defining the term "intellectual". It seems that they equate it more with faith and obedience to the Church than anything else. Further, I just found the whole thread to be rather depressing. Aren't there more noteworthy Saints amongst the rank-and-file? Why do the GAs need to be placed on a pedestal for everything?
_GoodK

Re: MAD's "Great LDS Intellectuals" Thread

Post by _GoodK »

Mister Scratch wrote:Has anyone else read this laff-fest? I can't decide whether the thread is uproariously funny, or if it is a tragic embarrassment. The thread was begun by "Lamanite", who lists these folks in his "1st Presidency" of LDS Intellectuals:

President: Richard Bushman
1st Counselor: Leonard Arrington
2nd Counselor: Eugene England


The thread continues, and what's striking is how many GAs are listed as "intellectuals." Aren't these men supposed to be admired primarily for their spiritual gifts, rather than their (to paraphrase BKP) "so-called" intellectualism? (Further, some of these selections seem like a stretch. I mean, John Taylor? Come on, now.) Joseph Smith and BY each get multiple mentions, as does GBH. The poster called "Thinking" had this provocative observation:

Thinking wrote:Is it possible that the greatest Mormon intellects are not LDS anymore?


Others included BH Roberts, Hugh Nibley, and (ulp...) Lou Midgley. What's noticeable is the remarkable absence of women from the list (Calmoriah included her mother, and Lamanite said, later in the thread, "Ann Madsen.") Check out this classic from Hammer:

I would add the Holy Ghost and Jesus Christ.


The Holy Ghost and Jesus are among the greatest Mormon intellectuals of all time. Yes; I'd be interested in reading Prof. Christ's doctoral dissertation.

Anyways, what a bizarre thread! One wonders just how, exactly, these folks are defining the term "intellectual". It seems that they equate it more with faith and obedience to the Church than anything else. Further, I just found the whole thread to be rather depressing. Aren't there more noteworthy Saints amongst the rank-and-file? Why do the GAs need to be placed on a pedestal for everything?


Sorry to be so vulgar, but it's like a retard circle jerk over there sometimes..
_Jason Bourne
_Emeritus
Posts: 9207
Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 8:00 pm

Post by _Jason Bourne »

Oh what the heck is his name

The guy who invented the TV. He was LDS.
_The Nehor
_Emeritus
Posts: 11832
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2007 2:05 am

Post by _The Nehor »

Did I get left out?
"Surely he knows that DCP, The Nehor, Lamanite, and other key apologists..." -Scratch clarifying my status in apologetics
"I admit it; I'm a petty, petty man." -Some Schmo
_Mister Scratch
_Emeritus
Posts: 5604
Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 8:13 pm

Post by _Mister Scratch »

Jason Bourne wrote:Oh what the heck is his name

The guy who invented the TV. He was LDS.


Philo T. Farnsworth. And yes, he *did* get a mention.
_Sethbag
_Emeritus
Posts: 6855
Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2007 10:52 am

Post by _Sethbag »

Philo Farnsworth?

Was he really an intellectual? Or more of a very smart tinkerer? I haven't read much about him.

edit: oops, Scratch and I cross-posted
Mormonism ceased being a compelling topic for me when I finally came to terms with its transformation from a personality cult into a combination of a real estate company, a SuperPac, and Westboro Baptist Church. - Kishkumen
_moksha
_Emeritus
Posts: 22508
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 8:42 pm

Post by _moksha »

Jason Bourne wrote:Oh what the heck is his name

The guy who invented the TV. He was LDS.


Philo Farnsworth.



What about the triumvirate of Bruce McConkie, Ezra Taft Benson and Boyd K. Packer? Or the Other triumvirate of Daniel C. Peterson, David Bokovoy and Bill Hamblin?

or even Juliann, Pahoran and Selek?
Cry Heaven and let loose the Penguins of Peace
_Mister Scratch
_Emeritus
Posts: 5604
Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 8:13 pm

Post by _Mister Scratch »

Sethbag wrote:Philo Farnsworth?

Was he really an intellectual? Or more of a very smart tinkerer? I haven't read much about him.

edit: oops, Scratch and I cross-posted


A good question, and I believe it cuts to the twin-fisted heart of my OP. (1) How does one go about defining an "intellectual"? and (2) Is intellectualism---however you define it---really tolerated in the Church?

Based on that aptly named MADthread, I would have to say that the bulk of TBMs equate "intellectualism" with devotion to the Church. The more devoted one is, (e.g., a GA such as Henry Eyring), the more "intellectual" the person. That appears to be their position, in any case.
_Mister Scratch
_Emeritus
Posts: 5604
Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 8:13 pm

Post by _Mister Scratch »

moksha wrote:
Jason Bourne wrote:Oh what the heck is his name

The guy who invented the TV. He was LDS.


Philo Farnsworth.



What about the triumvirate of Bruce McConkie, Ezra Taft Benson and Boyd K. Packer? Or the Other triumvirate of Daniel C. Peterson, David Bokovoy and Bill Hamblin?

or even Juliann, Pahoran and Selek?


DCP was mentioned. None of the others, though (AFAICR...)
_The Dude
_Emeritus
Posts: 2976
Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 3:16 am

Post by _The Dude »

Who do you think were the strongest Mormons of all time?

Joseph Smith liked to wrestle and bully, so he's gotta be up there.
GBH was known for his wiry little muscles, but Monson is taller so he's probably stronger as well.
But Christ and the Holy Ghost were the strongest of all time, for sure. They have to be, 'cause they are the top dogs: the fastest, smartest, most intellectual, most super-hero-like Mormons of all time. That's the way it works when you assign "good" qualities to the people you idolize.
"And yet another little spot is smoothed out of the echo chamber wall..." Bond
Post Reply