GoodK is Chap?

Post by **_cksalmon** » Sat Mar 29, 2008 6:18 pm

I think "GoodK"/"Chap" should log in/log out/log in in really, really quick succession, responding to the posts of his/her/its alter ego.

Then perhaps Mormons can use such negative evidence as a demonstration that DCP's thesis is true.

We all know that, while positive evidence for Mormonism is useful, negative evidence is even better.

Joseph Smith believed in HGT? That's actually evidence for LGT.

Or, as Vogel says, it's a no-fault system.

CKS

Post by **_the road to hana** » Sat Mar 29, 2008 6:30 pm

Chiasmus? Did someone mention chiasmus?

_GoodK · Post by **_GoodK** » Sat Mar 29, 2008 7:00 pm

Moniker wrote:GoodK, do you get fussed at by your family 'cause you post here?

No I don't. My mom couldn't care less about apologetics, and my dad and I have always been able to debate and discuss Mormonism and religion. I'm now emailing him and DCP regarding the issue Chap raised...

Funny story, remember how Bob Crockett supposedly sent that post to my parents regarding my sister... apparently that was all BS, bob never sent it. He was bluffing.

Post by **_Jersey Girl** » Sat Mar 29, 2008 7:05 pm

What gets me is the sheer chickens*****edness of the email and how typical it is of a large group of LDS apologists that I see posting online. This dynamic presents itself repeatedly on the boards and on websites (McCue anyone?)to the point where it almost looks pathological. Apparently DCP is monitoring this board and has chosen not to reply to Chap. Instead, he tries to get two birds with one stone.

1. Rat GoodK out to Daddy. (for posting critically)
2. Call into question GoodK's character (the allegation of switching screen names)

What am I left to conclude here? That DCP can't handle the kid in public so he resorts to "I'm telling! Daddy! Daddy! He's looking at me!" DCP feels violated so he violates the kid/parent relationship?

What? DCP can't tackle the kid so he tries to get Daddy to tackle the kid?

I ask you, how Big Brother chickens*** is that?

Post by **_Moniker** » Sat Mar 29, 2008 7:05 pm

Mister Scratch wrote:
DCP sometimes drifts over into the realm of delusion. One time, in the midst of a rather heated exchange with me, he all of the sudden began flailing about in a near panic, claiming that he "feared" for himself and his family. All we had been doing was discussing something (Quinn, perhaps), and DCP completely flew off the handle.

Now, as to this GoodK tattle-tale email, I find this utterly disgusting. Would DCP like me to pass on the various crap he's said over the years to his SP? Or, heaven forbid, to one of the Brethren? Or, on account of his Mopologetic standing, does he feel that he's virtually immune to any Church discipline?

I can completely understand the paranoia and wishing to remain anonymous when there are emails sent to family members. I would be going completely ballistic if someone did this to me!!!

I certainly don't fear for myself and my family from you, Scratch. You're not that scary. ;)

Post by **_Moniker** » Sat Mar 29, 2008 7:06 pm

Blixa wrote:
Moniker wrote:Chap was here for a while before GoodK came on board. Even more than that just their style is completely different ...

Jinx! GoodK may owe you a drink Mon, but you owe me a Coke (glass, not can, please).

Um hmmm... glass is superior. We all need to get together for drinks. I lose track of who I owe what to!

Post by **_Moniker** » Sat Mar 29, 2008 7:08 pm

GoodK wrote:
Moniker wrote:GoodK, do you get fussed at by your family 'cause you post here?

No I don't. My mom couldn't care less about apologetics, and my dad and I have always been able to debate and discuss Mormonism and religion. I'm now emailing him and DCP regarding the issue Chap raised...

Funny story, remember how Bob Crockett supposedly sent that post to my parents regarding my sister... apparently that was all BS, bob never sent it. He was bluffing.

WHAT? He never sent it??? That's nuts! What was the reasoning THERE?

WTF??!!

This board is like an alternate universe !!! !!! -- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NzlG28B- ... re=related

Glad your parents are cool with it. :)

Post by **_Jersey Girl** » Sat Mar 29, 2008 7:11 pm

Moniker wrote:
GoodK wrote:
Moniker wrote:GoodK, do you get fussed at by your family 'cause you post here?

No I don't. My mom couldn't care less about apologetics, and my dad and I have always been able to debate and discuss Mormonism and religion. I'm now emailing him and DCP regarding the issue Chap raised...

Funny story, remember how Bob Crockett supposedly sent that post to my parents regarding my sister... apparently that was all BS, bob never sent it. He was bluffing.

WHAT? He never sent it??? That's nuts! What was the reasoning THERE?

WTF??!!

This board is like an alternate universe !!! !!! -- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NzlG28B- ... re=related

Glad your parents are cool with it. :)

Do the math, Moniker.

Claim+bluff=implied threat to shut him up

Post by **_Moniker** » Sat Mar 29, 2008 7:14 pm

Riiiiggghhhhttt... I was typing spastically, while guffawing, after a brief look of semi-shocked amusement passed my face when I wrote that post. :)

I wanted to know if GoodK had anything else to say on his motivations.

Post by **_Jersey Girl** » Sat Mar 29, 2008 7:14 pm

Moniker,

Let me ask you this. So, you don't like something the other poster is saying to you. Has it EVER ONCE crossed your mind to screw with their real life in real life?

Yes, I agree with the alternative universe eval. Definitely.