DCP Laughs in the Face of Tragedy

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_KimberlyAnn
_Emeritus
Posts: 3171
Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 2:03 pm

Post by _KimberlyAnn »

harmony wrote:
LifeOnaPlate wrote:You haven't heard? I was one of the original Beach Boys. (ps- Having a number 1 single doesn't mean much to a music snob like me who despises pop garbage.)


Your nickname could be LiesOnaPlate.


Nah. LOaP already has a nickname. I bestowed it on him last fall. It's AssOnaPlate. You gotta hand it to him...

KA
_LifeOnaPlate
_Emeritus
Posts: 2799
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2007 4:50 pm

Post by _LifeOnaPlate »

KimberlyAnn wrote:
harmony wrote:
LifeOnaPlate wrote:You haven't heard? I was one of the original Beach Boys. (ps- Having a number 1 single doesn't mean much to a music snob like me who despises pop garbage.)


Your nickname could be LiesOnaPlate.


Nah. LOaP already has a nickname. I bestowed it on him last fall. It's AssOnaPlate. You gotta hand it to him...

KA


Look, KA, not everyone shares your "turn-on" preferences, aight? She's capable of creating a nickname for me that suits her best.
One moment in annihilation's waste,
one moment, of the well of life to taste-
The stars are setting and the caravan
starts for the dawn of nothing; Oh, make haste!

-Omar Khayaam

*Be on the lookout for the forthcoming album from Jiminy Finn and the Moneydiggers.*
_GoodK

Post by _GoodK »

Reading this, my mind immediately went to renters insurance.

While it may be nice to sing The Spirit of God in front of a burnt building, it would be really nice if these poor folks were properly prepared for such a tragedy.
_harmony
_Emeritus
Posts: 18195
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am

Post by _harmony »

KimberlyAnn wrote:
harmony wrote:
LifeOnaPlate wrote:You haven't heard? I was one of the original Beach Boys. (ps- Having a number 1 single doesn't mean much to a music snob like me who despises pop garbage.)


Your nickname could be LiesOnaPlate.


Nah. LOaP already has a nickname. I bestowed it on him last fall. It's AssOnaPlate. You gotta hand it to him...

KA


Nice shoes, KA!
_KimberlyAnn
_Emeritus
Posts: 3171
Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 2:03 pm

Post by _KimberlyAnn »

harmony wrote:Nice shoes, KA!


Thanks, Harmony! Those are my favoritest pair of shoes ever! I bought them last summer and I'm afraid they'll wear out soon. Then what will I do? So, I'm on the look-out for more black and white polka-dotted shoes. I'll buy several pair and stockpile them if I find some I love.

KA
_Mister Scratch
_Emeritus
Posts: 5604
Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 8:13 pm

Post by _Mister Scratch »

Another update:

The Good Professor wrote:I've discovered, by the way, that it's being said elsewhere that one of the (characteristically) evil things that I've done on this thread -- have I ever done a good thing in the minds of my hyperhostile critics, or ever, in any action whatever, failed to disgrace myself? -- is not only to boast about the superiority of Mormons to non-Mormons but, because I'm such an über-Mormon zealot, to attempt to blame the fire on infidels outside the Church.

This is ridiculous.

As a matter of fact, the person who inadvertently started the fire by tipping over the candle -- a contract-violating scented candle that may or may not (I don't know) have been lit by the same person who accidentally tipped it over -- is a member of the Church, though not a member of my ward. (The person is single but older, and, thus, as a few others do for language- and/or age-related reasons, does not attend my relatively young singles ward but, instead, goes to another. I had never met this person until last night.)

I don't blame this person, who is feeling horrible, embarrassed, and guilty, and all of whose possessions were destroyed. It was an accident, though a careless one on at least two fronts. I certainly don't blame the fire on non-Mormon infidels. (I don't think in those terms.)

Needless to say, my Malevolent Stalker is making as much out of this as he can over on his ex-Mormon and largely atheist home board. Every day, to the satisfaction of his weirdly obsessive and deeply hostile mind, brings stunning new evidence of my arrogance and my unbelievable depravity. I wish him joy of it.

I do, however, think that it was marvelous to see how effectively the organization of the Church kicked in on this one. The elders quorum presidency and the Relief Society presidency worked very well together, my counselor (whom I had sent as my representative until I could get there) was on top of everything, all was organized and efficient, we had new lodging arranged before most people had even arrived back at the complex from church services, food was provided, and longer-term food- and other needs were and are being assessed in a quite methodical manner. And members as well as infidels . . . er, I mean non-members . . . were cared for without distinction.

Are Mormons the only people with benevolent inclinations? Obviously not. Are Mormons exceptionally well-organized for quick, efficient action in cases like this? I think the answer is "Obviously, yes," and that this incident illustrated that fact.

And the gleefully appalled reaction of my Malevolent Stalker illustrates the awesome power of personal and ideological malice to warp and distort.

I know, I know. I shouldn't care, but I confess that I find it disgusting.


"The awesome power of personal and ideological malice to warp and distort"? What, is he finally (honestly) stating what goes on at FARMS?

In any case, I'm glad to see that he'd clarified his initial statement, thus removing insinuation that it was an "inactive" or "never-Mo" who started the fire.
_Mister Scratch
_Emeritus
Posts: 5604
Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 8:13 pm

Post by _Mister Scratch »

The Nehor wrote:
Jason Bourne wrote:Wow Scratch

Another fine spin job and smear of trying to make someone look bad when nothing untoward seems intended. It amazes me what you find when there is really nothing there at all.


As far as I know Scratch at least DCP doesn't spend his time examining other people's sex lives. Glass houses and all that.


Actually, he does. Did you not read his comments concerning Mike Quinn's excommunication? You really need to get with the program, Nehor.
_Mister Scratch
_Emeritus
Posts: 5604
Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 8:13 pm

Post by _Mister Scratch »

Jason Bourne wrote:Wow Scratch

Another fine spin job and smear of trying to make someone look bad when nothing untoward seems intended. It amazes me what you find when there is really nothing there at all.


What among my comments counts as a "smear", Jason? I think I've been quite clear about where my criticism was aimed: namely, at the insinuation that "inactives" or never-Mos were responsible for the blaze, and in the rather opportunistic use of this tragedy as PR for the Church. It's one thing to praise members for coming together in kindness and generosity. It's quite another to use this as "evidence" for how great/true the LDS Church is.
_Some Schmo
_Emeritus
Posts: 15602
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 2:59 pm

Post by _Some Schmo »

I don't think there's any doubt that DCP has a thing for recognition. It seems to be the underlying theme of everything he writes.

So he's insecure about his self-worth, and is trying to validate himself through the admiration of other Mormons. What else is new?
God belief is for people who don't want to live life on the universe's terms.
_wenglund
_Emeritus
Posts: 4947
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 7:25 pm

Post by _wenglund »

Tal Bachman wrote:Scratch - with all respect, I think your expectations are way too high here. People suck - once we accept that, then everything you're describing will actually seem fantastic. :P


Ironically, I tend to view people, for the most part, almost the opposite of what you state here, though with the same result. I consider people in general to be good and descent and loving and kind, and so the things being described (not to be confused with the way in which they are being described here) actually also strike me as fantastic--both meeting and exceeding my high expectations.

Perhaps this is a case of us respectively seeing the glass half empty/full. To each their own. ;-)

Thanks, -Wade Englund-
Post Reply