What angers me most about polygamy is the only reason it was instituted was for a cover up of Joseph Smith infidelities.
As of yet I don't think there is solid evidence of these infidelities? There are a lot of claims, he said she said, and rumors. I don't believe that the DNA evidence that was being sought after has given any evidence to prove your claim? If so let me know. We know that Josephs wife Emma was even pregnant while Joseph was martyred so obvsiously if he was having fun on the side there would no doubt be many children to prove your claim. We know that Joseph denied having polygamist wives, we know that all of the evidence was taken to court and a non biased judged said it is obvious he had only one. We also know that the Utah Church has been in the business of changing history since the day they left for Salt Lake, still doing it today just go see their new movie about Emma Smith, anyone that knows the history will see it. Go to their visitors center and watch the film on Joseph Smith and you'll see that they have Joseph ordaining Brigham Young as the next prophet, anyone who knows the history knows this never happened. Yet people still believe what they Utah Church says. It's interesting isn't it.
RockHeaded
Considering your post was punctuated poorly I am guessing you are inbred. Care to share what branch of the fraud of Mormonism you hail from?
And yes, it is interesting, specifically to those who study control and mass delusions.
So my punctuation is the only evidence you have that you are correct. Good I can see this is going to be easy.
RockHeaded wrote:We know that Josephs wife Emma was even pregnant while Joseph was martyred so obvsiously if he was having fun on the side there would no doubt be many children to prove your claim.
Except for the fact that A) Joseph's children were raised as the children of whatever man his "wives" were married to, and B) John C. Bennett served as Joseph's abortionist.
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"
RockHeaded wrote:Considering your post was punctuated poorly I am guessing you are inbred. Care to share what branch of the fraud of Mormonism you hail from?
And yes, it is interesting, specifically to those who study control and mass delusions.
So my punctuation is the only evidence you have that you are correct. Good I can see this is going to be easy.[/quote]
Actually, if you remember back to your senior year of remedial reading, Dick and Jane taught you that sentence structure and punctuation were key.
Being that reading comprehension is not your strong point ill point out to you that i equated (bust out the dictionary for that one) your poor punctuation with being inbred.
Does your family tree branch?
And crawling on the planet's face Some insects called the human race Lost in time And lost in space...and meaning
RockHeaded wrote:We know that Josephs wife Emma was even pregnant while Joseph was martyred so obvsiously if he was having fun on the side there would no doubt be many children to prove your claim.
Except for the fact that A) Joseph's children were raised as the children of whatever man his "wives" were married to, and B) John C. Bennett served as Joseph's abortionist.
Really? And the research that the Utah Church has been doing on DNA for the past few years has brought this evidence to light? If theses children existed they would be been brought as evidence. You do know about the temple lot case I am sure. You also know how rediculous the Utah Church looked making these claims. The John C. Bennett claim is a joke right? I've never heard this one. You realize that John C. Bennett only joined the church because he was intrigued with polygamy. I believe that Joseph ex-commuted John C. Bennett because of this, correct?
RockHeaded wrote:You realize that John C. Bennett only joined the church because he was intrigued with polygamy.
Which pretty much proves that Joseph was practicing it.
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"
Boaz & Lidia wrote:Legally and by definition, any child born outside of a legal marriage, is known as a bastard.
How far back does your bastard line go?
I'm not sure about the US, but in Canada it's been a long time since children were legally characterised depending on the marital status of their parents.