(some!!!!) Mormon & exmormon men and the internet

[_harmony]

You have no idea what kind of pm's I get. I don't talk about them.

I see so men are pm'ing you as if you are a whore..ok. You too then are doing something wrong

Incorrect assumption again, marg. Once more: you have no idea what kind of pm's I get. I don't talk about them. They're pm's. If the people involved wanted to publish our conversations publically, they wouldn't be pm'ing me.

I only frequent LDS boards, so I have no reference about non-LDS men. I find that men can discuss sexual subjects without straying off into the inappropriate, if they are sufficiently motivated. Unfortunately, that happens only rarely and few men are stable enough to pull it off. I don't know if it has something to do with upbringing or simply a gender thing. I'm reminded of the new Brad Paisley song, I'm Still a Guy.

I don't know what your issues are Harmony. There is a problem with men on this board being inappropriate discussing sex? I must not have read some threads somewhere.

Indeed.

[_Moniker]

I didn't read your blog Moniker, but you seem to focus much more on sex than any of the posters here, including the men.

Enjoy the reading: There's lots more where those came from!

And then take it the hell back!
http://mormondiscussions.com/discuss/vi ... highlight=

[_marg]

I don't know what your issues are Harmony. There is a problem with men on this board being inappropriate discussing sex? I must not have read some threads somewhere.

Indeed.[/quote]

I've never read anything from men on this board as being inappopriate regarding sex or the way they treated women as being inappropriate.

[_beastie]

I've never read anything from men on this board as being inappopriate regarding sex or the way they treated women as being inappropriate.

I'd love to see you in a T-shirt.

[_Moniker]

Here you go, marg.

Go whip up on Will a bit for his behavior. Yet, I mean, that's not as satisfying as whipping me 'cause he didn't catch JAK plagiarizing, right? :)

http://mormondiscussions.com/discuss/vi ... fat#136267

[_beastie]

I pointed out to you that JAK asked me about porno when I was talking about art -- it wasn't appropriate. YOU were the one that told Ren he had sexual fantasies about me!

I suspect this sentence tells us all we need to know about why marg has reacted the way she has on this thread.

[_marg]

I didn't read your blog Moniker, but you seem to focus much more on sex than any of the posters here, including the men.

Enjoy the reading: There's lots more where those came from!

And then take it the hell back!
http://mormondiscussions.com/discuss/vi ... highlight=

What am I suppposed to take back. I once briefly looked at it, I believe Liz and GIMR were talking about vibrators (it's been a while since I looked at it).

So what is your point. That they talk about sex. That was my point at the beginning of this thread. That the women on this board are the one's being flirtatious and suggestive. They are the ones setting it up that way, not the men. As far as yourself goes, you seem to play dumb, you write stuff suggestive and then act surprised when someone responds to it as if it was suggestive. Moniker if you are getting a certain reaction from men don't assume it is the other person's fault. Don't assume Mormonism has anything to do with it. If you are going to flaunt how you use drugs, like sex, wear sexy clothes etc etc, don't be surprised if you get men acting interested. It is that simple.

[_marg]

I pointed out to you that JAK asked me about porno when I was talking about art -- it wasn't appropriate. YOU were the one that told Ren he had sexual fantasies about me!

I suspect this sentence tells us all we need to know about why marg has reacted the way she has on this thread.

The reason I reacted in opposition to you, is because you had set it up that all 3 of you women, you J.G. & Moniker have noticed this inappropriate behavior and were all non Mormon, therefore you concluded there must be something to your argument. Not only did I think your observations were unfounded, but as a non Mormon, non religious individual I thought a counter voice was warranted.

[_Moniker]

I didn't read your blog Moniker, but you seem to focus much more on sex than any of the posters here, including the men.

Enjoy the reading: There's lots more where those came from!

And then take it the hell back!
http://mormondiscussions.com/discuss/vi ... highlight=

What am I suppposed to take back. I once briefly looked at it, I believe Liz and GIMR were talking about vibrators (it's been a while since I looked at it).

So what is your point. That they talk about sex. That was my point at the beginning of this thread. That the women on this board are the one's being flirtatious and suggestive. They are the ones setting it up that way, not the men. As far as yourself goes, you seem to play dumb, you write stuff suggestive and then act surprised when someone responds to it as if it was suggestive. Moniker if you are getting a certain reaction from men don't assume it is the other person's fault. Don't assume Mormonism has anything to do with it. If you are going to flaunt how you use drugs, like sex, wear sexy clothes etc etc, don't be surprised if you get men acting interested. It is that simple.

I don't do drugs you dodo. I don't even drink! I don't have sex either! But, I have in the past and I can talk about it! I do buy clothes that I think are CUTE -- and sexy. Yep, sure do. Burn me at the stake.

You know marg, for a non-LDS you sure as “F” act a lot like Charity.

So, women that did drugs in their past, used to be an exotic dancer, wear cute clothes somehow or another want random men on the internet to make comments to them and see if they want to meet up and screw? Well, this one does NOT!

Men should control themselves and act like GENTLEMEN. Maybe I've lived in the South too long. Perhaps that's it. Women look cute, and we can be cute in personality and style and men don't say a goddamn word -- they should keep their mouths shut.

I wanted you to take back this:

you seem to focus much more on sex than any of the posters here, including the men.

You ever seen the Brother Bedme (oops) Bednar threads, marg? I don't get in there and talk about harnesses and crap. I certainly don't go in and INVITE sexual attention. Maybe my personality DOES attract certain attention -- I've been told it does. That's fine -- but, men shouldn't be pigs regardless.

[_Jersey Girl]

I've never read anything from men on this board as being inappopriate regarding sex or the way they treated women as being inappropriate.

I'd love to see you in a T-shirt.

Make it wet and you got yourself a deal, hon.